Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

in some shots, dorian's calves looked far too big for the rest of his physique.

when you hit a mm and your calves overpower your upper body, you know you have a balance and proportional problem:

your calves are too big for the rest of your physique:

[pobrecito]

his upperbody is for sure, his lower body is losing badly to ray though, on every level. his quads are even smaller even though he is way heavier. ray has better proportion,conditioning,symmetry,size and shape in the lower body.

I don't know what kind of shit you are smoking, but Dorian's quads absolutely drarf Shawn's....Dorian's calf alone is the size of Shawn quad.

Plus, as I have already explained to you, separations and striations are not an indicator of condition. Dorian was harder than anyone at the 94 Olympia, eventhough he was not at his personal best. He was still the best conditioned man at the contest. If he was not, he would not have won the show, just like Ronnie did not this year. They are the same judges. The criteria is the same.

[pobrecito]

in some shots, dorian's calves looked far too big for the rest of his physique.

when you hit a mm and your calves overpower your upper body, you know you have a balance and proportional problem:

your calves are too big for the rest of your physique:

Really...then why did you say that this picture is morphed?

Dorian's is in perfect balance in this shot.

[Necrosis]

what in the fuck is hardness, how do you measure it with the criteria, its like me talking about muscle maturity, and x-frames fuck off with the non-sense

dorians proportion for upper to lower body is the worst ive ever seen, his upper body looks like it belongs to a 280 dude and the lower body to a 220 dude. his arm looks to be as thick as his quads.

[pobrecito]

That is the most famous bodybuilding shot of all-time.

[Hulkster]

notice how much better conditioned ronnie is:

you can clearly see his rectus femoris muscles in both quads.

dorian's are invisible.

[Hulkster]

Really...then why did you say that this picture is morphed?

Dorian's is in perfect balance in this shot.

thats not the pic I thought was morphed.

it was that shot superimposed on an orange background that I was talking about.

[Hulkster]

That is the most famous bodybuilding shot of all-time.

hahahaha

sorry bro, dorian flexing his worst bodyparts is FAR from the most famous bb shot of all time...

 

[pobrecito]

hahahaha

sorry bro, dorian flexing his worst bodyparts is FAR from the most famous bb shot of all time...

 

You are nothing but a little hater.

That shot is mind-boggling.

And it is the most famous bodybuilding-shot of all-time

[Necrosis]

haha sure it is pumpkin. look at his arms, they look like they belong to two different guys ahahahahha, moster assymetry and horrible propotion. his left forarms is the size of his right bicep. that left arm is impressive, to bad he didnt have two of them ahahahahahahahahah. legs look like utter shit, no sweep, look to be half the size of colman,cutler,branch etc and have as much seperation as a guy with 20% bodyfat. not to mention the fucking zero taper and blocky waist.


look at those arms thats worse then cutler, and the upper body looks twice the size of the lower. ND didnt you say he had great proportion HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. his arms belong to two different people.

[Necrosis]

i cant get over how bad that infamous shot is, the bicep dont even connect the same and is outer thigh is missing HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH AH. he actually is more symmetrical with the tear.

[pobrecito]

Is that the best you got?

I have history on my side.

You have bias. Nothing more. Ignorant bias at that.

[Hulkster]

You are nothing but a little hater.

That shot is mind-boggling.

And it is the most famous bodybuilding-shot of all-time

where do you come up with this stuff?

[pobrecito]

just admit defeat Hulkster.

You are reduced to nothing but a biased hater.

You have zero proof on your side. All of the judging criteria, all of the history, all of the quotes, they all point to Yates and you continue to fight this.

[Hulkster]

just admit defeat Hulkster.

You are reduced to nothing but a biased hater.

You have zero proof on your side. All of the judging criteria, all of the history, all of the quotes, they all point to Yates and you continue to fight this.

of course they point to yates, over his 205 pound competition with no back.

unfortunately for you, in the case of yates versus a peak (not 1992 or 1994 or whatever) Ronnie Coleman, reality points to Big Ron.

[pobrecito]

So why not have this thread deleted?

I, for one, will never give in to Coleman. Personally, I love Coleman as a bodybuilder, I admire him, I believe in the way he trains, I love his attitude, and I think he completely dominated his competition at times like Yates did. However, I think Yates was slightly better at their respective bests.

You, nor I, or ND, will never change our opinions. I could care less if this goes 5000 pages.

[Necrosis]

So why not have this thread deleted?

I, for one, will never give in to Coleman. Personally, I love Coleman as a bodybuilder, I admire him, I believe in the way he trains, I love his attitude, and I think he completely dominated his competition at times like Yates did. However, I think Yates was slightly better at their respective bests.

You, nor I, or ND, will never change our opinions. I could care less if this goes 5000 pages.

ill hire aubrey de gray and become immortal through his research and keep this thread going forever. maybe ray kurzweil too.

[Hulkster]

So why not have this thread deleted?

I, for one, will never give in to Coleman. Personally, I love Coleman as a bodybuilder, I admire him, I believe in the way he trains, I love his attitude, and I think he completely dominated his competition at times like Yates did. However, I think Yates was slightly better at their respective bests.

You, nor I, or ND, will never change our opinions. I could care less if this goes 5000 pages.

thats because you guys are stubborn.

we the ronnie side have shown you guys in broad daylight that peak ronnie was better.

and what did you do?

rather than say "yes, you are right, dorian would not win against that"

you instead come up with bullshit that the 99 content is fake and doctored, or that dorian's muscle fibres pressing into his skin in such a way that it reflects light waves into our eyes to fool us into thinking his he smooth...

give me a break..

why not just stop being stubborn and admit the truth:

that dorian would not win against a 1999 or even 2001 Arnold Classic Ronnie.

[pobrecito]

Dorian would beat a 99 Ronnie, in a close battle, and he would easily defeat  the smaller AC version

[Iceman1981]

hahahah....Yates is owning Coleman there.....too bad the picture cuts off at half-calf or else the owning would be even worse!!! hahahahahahaha

How is yates owning Coleman there? The only thing yates has on Coleman there are the calves. Coleman has bigger quads, more seperated, alot drier, better sweep. Please explain how yates is owning that shot?

[Iceman1981]

Here is one more shot. I even used ND's "favourite" clasped pose from an "angle", lol.

[Hulkster]

see what I mean?

claiming "doctored" footage or "light waves relecting off of muscle fibres to fool us into thinking smoothness" is just stupid.

just admit the truth and apply normal bodybuilding standards and anyone can see that Ronnie (at his best) is better.

[pobrecito]

98 back double bi looking like shit

[pobrecito]

98 front double bi looking like shit

[pobrecito]

Underwhelming most-muscular compared to the mysterious screencaps.