you have provided no real evidence or even 1 qualified source to back anything up you say.
you seem to forget that your opinion means nothing and carries absolutely no weight - you have no credentials.
you are simply stating your opinion of pictures, even if they are fake, when in reality qualified sources have said the exact opposite of what you claim - judges and other competitors.
history and facts have proven you wrong time and time again, but for some reason you think that your opinion of what a champion bodybuilders looks like is worth more than a handful of shit (or how ronnie looked in 06).
hulkster, you've had 900 pages to provided any evidence or proof to anything you've said in 900 pages.
what are you waiting for?
this is probably the stupidest post I have ever read.
900 pages to prove what?
that peak Ronnie is better?
that has been done countless times - just open your damn eyes.
You want a "qualified opinion" as to who was better at their peaks? Ronnie or Dorian?
well guess what?
its unlikely that you will find a direct quote comparing 98/99 ronnie to dorian at his best.
you have lots of praise for yates
you have lots of praise for ronnie
but until a "qualified source - however the hell you will define that" comments DIRECTLY on this thread, you are not going to get one.
in the mean time, just use your brain and you will see that ronnie is better:
ps what exactly do you mean by "direct evidence"?
we have great screencaps taken from both the 99 and 93 olympias and lots of great comparisons were made. That is about as 'direct' as you are EVER going to get unless you can create a time machine and transport device.
maybe dorian can use some of his magic powers and make you one?

oh wait, I forgot - Ronnie was clearly better in those comparisons to the extent that all you could do was claim that the vidcaps were fake...

if that isn't an admission that Ronnie is better, I don't know what is..