Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

Once again, Hulkster infatuated with the most-muscular.

He truly is delusional to say that Cormier - 248lbs - would beat a 274lb Dorian.

have you seen how BAD dorian looked in 97? watch the youtube clip.

huge back yes.

but overall a very poor quality physique compared to Chris 99.. Smoothness everywhere with the widest waist in Mr. Olympia history. sorry, but size isn't everything...

he had okay abs, though, as dorian always did.

[Hulkster]

Once again, Hulkster infatuated with the most-muscular.

its not my fault that dorian 97 lacks the quality of 99 Chris and Ronnie.

[Iceman1981]

How fucking dumb are you ? I only pick & choose the quotes I want to use? I posted the Peter McGough quote saying Ronnie 2001 was the best ever , I mean again pay attention to the argument because you will get owned

You only "credit" the quotes that work for your arguement, but you don't "credit" the quotes that work against you like what Peter McGough said about the 2001 Arnold Classic, Ronnie would be unbeatable. You choose not to give credit to that quote. That's why everyone is on your a$$. But like you said, judges judge contests, not fans. Try not to reply with stupid answer. What I just said is plain and simple. Everyone sees what you are doing, why can't you?

[NarcissisticDeity]

have you seen how BAD dorian looked in 97? watch the youtube clip.

huge back yes.

but overall a very poor quality physique compared to Chris 99.. Smoothness everywhere with the widest waist in Mr. Olympia history. sorry, but size isn't everything...

he had okay abs, though, as dorian always did.

He wasn't smooth in 1997 he was bone dry , again he was never smooth in his career his problem was torn muscles NOT conditioning

these are from 1997 , straight firsts mind you

[NarcissisticDeity]

You only "credit" the quotes that work for your arguement, but you don't "credit" the quotes that work against you like what Peter McGough said about the 2001 Arnold Classic, Ronnie would be unbeatable. You choose not to give credit to that quote. That's why everyone is on your a$$. But like you said, judges judge contests, not fans. Try not to reply with stupid answer. What I just said is plain and simple. Everyone sees what you are doing, why can't you?

You people aren't very bright , I posted the quote , I don't fear the quote its actually old news and of course I use credits that support my claims why on God's earth wouldn't I? what kind of logic is that? I respect Peter's opinion but I''m not bound to agree with everything he says , you guys dismiss Lee Priset saying Dorian would easily beat Ronnie , so don't cling onto Peter's quote and in the same breath dismiss Priests and then turn around and bitch about me only using quotes that support my argument lol fucking-hypocrite lol

[Hulkster]

LOL how can you post those shots and then say he wasn't smooth?

 

you truly have no idea what conditioning is or what it looks like on stage do you?

he looked like the stay puffed marshmallow man compared to 1993.

bone dry my white ass..

[Hulkster]

, again he was never smooth in his career his problem was torn muscles NOT conditioning

you mean he tore every muscle in his body except for those in his midsection in 1997?

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

you mean he tore every muscle in his body except for those in his midsection in 1997?

 

Yawn his back was still better than ANYONES including the 255 pound Coleman  among other parts

[Necrosis]

haha nd posts pictures of dorian looking smoother then a babies ass and acts like hes shredded. theres not a cut in site. hahahahah. notice the massive cuts in his legs. hahaha heres ronnie pre contest destroying yates in size, shape, cuts, seperation.

[Iceman1981]

you truly are delusional and insane.

 

why would cormier beat dorian?


its not like dorian showed up out of shape - like ronnie did in 00,01,02, and 06. 

Coleman won all of those years you mentioned except 06, but came a little out of shape in 01, 02. In your opinion he shouldn't have won, but like ND says "Judges judge contests, not fans".  And exactly what are you talking about out of shape in 2000? He looked good to me. No one was close to him in 2000. Just look at the tape again, that's all you have to do. And to quote ND, "He had straight firsts in every round". Yates came out of shape in 94, 96, 97 and the judges gave him the wins. What's all the bytching about.

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL how can you post those shots and then say he wasn't smooth?

 

you truly have no idea what conditioning is or what it looks like on stage do you?

he looked like the stay puffed marshmallow man compared to 1993.

bone dry my white ass..

Hulkster you're the last one on this board who knows what conditioning is , you think Dorian 99 was holding water LMFAO you know not one single competitor bitches about Dorian winning in 1997 , Shawn complained he shouldn't have got straight firsts but he never said he didn't deserve to win

[NarcissisticDeity]

haha nd posts pictures of dorian looking smoother then a babies ass and acts like hes shredded. theres not a cut in site. hahahahah. notice the massive cuts in his legs. hahaha heres ronnie pre contest destroying yates in size, shape, cuts, seperation.

Dorian in 97 was dry shall I post quotes to confirm this or have you learned your lesson? lol do you ever get tired of getting owned? 

[Hulkster]

ND, you should not have posted that last lat spread. Makes you look like an idiot.

sure dorian had a ripped lower back.

doesn't mean he wasn't carrying water in a lot of other places:

Here is a lesson in conditioning for you:

[Iceman1981]

You people aren't very bright , I posted the quote , I don't fear the quote its actually old news and of course I use credits that support my claims why on God's earth wouldn't I? what kind of logic is that? I respect Peter's opinion but I''m not bound to agree with everything he says , you guys dismiss Lee Priset saying Dorian would easily beat Ronnie , so don't cling onto Peter's quote and in the same breath dismiss Priests and then turn around and bitch about me only using quotes that support my argument lol fucking-hypocrite lol

I suggest you read our posts "slower" next time. Then maybe you'll be able to answer correctly. Hypocrite? Look who's talking. You're the biggest 2 face on this board. Example: You've been saying all along that in your opinion yates shouldn't have won in 97, then recently now say that he deserved to win. lol, you're the biggest incompetent a$s around here.

[Hulkster]

haha nd posts pictures of dorian looking smoother then a babies ass and acts like hes shredded. theres not a cut in site. hahahahah. notice the massive cuts in his legs. hahaha heres ronnie pre contest destroying yates in size, shape, cuts, seperation.

very true.

[Iceman1981]

He wasn't smooth in 1997 he was bone dry , again he was never smooth in his career his problem was torn muscles NOT conditioning

these are from 1997 , straight firsts mind you

LOL. He is smoother than Kovacs.

[Hulkster]

Dorian in 97 was dry shall I post quotes to confirm this or have you learned your lesson? lol do you ever get tired of getting owned? 

 

sorry ND, but all your pics have just invalidated your quotes.

[Hulkster]

LOL. He is smoother than Kovacs.

very true again.

only kovacs has better arms

[IceCold]

Coleman won all of those years you mentioned except 06, but came a little out of shape in 01, 02. In your opinion he shouldn't have won, but like ND says "Judges judge contests, not fans".  And exactly what are you talking about out of shape in 2000? He looked good to me. No one was close to him in 2000. Just look at the tape again, that's all you have to do. And to quote ND, "He had straight firsts in every round". Yates came out of shape in 94, 96, 97 and the judges gave him the wins. What's all the bytching about.

i never exactly said that coleman didnt deserve to win.

but hulkster acts like yates was given gifts, but ignores 00,01, 02, and 06 for coleman.

[Iceman1981]

Pretty smooth in 97. Ho was only dry in the lower back and abs.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Coleman won all of those years you mentioned except 06, but came a little out of shape in 01, 02. In your opinion he shouldn't have won, but like ND says "Judges judge contests, not fans".  And exactly what are you talking about out of shape in 2000? He looked good to me. No one was close to him in 2000. Just look at the tape again, that's all you have to do. And to quote ND, "He had straight firsts in every round". Yates came out of shape in 94, 96, 97 and the judges gave him the wins. What's all the bytching about.

Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001

RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .

Ronnie was off especially compared to the twp previous years

Dorian was NOT out of shape ANY year , he was OFF for Dorian in 94 but he was still better than everyone else , and you quote Ronnie got straight firsts in 2000 and an indication that he was indeed in shape and then have the balls to type Dorian was out of shape in 94/96/97 and all of them were straight firsts victories lol hypocrite its easy to expose you for what you are a biased hypocrite 

[Iceman1981]

i never exactly said that coleman didnt deserve to win.

but hulkster acts like yates was given gifts, but ignores 00,01, 02, and 06 for coleman.

Exactly since when 2000 was a gift. Who was even close to Coleman that year?

[IceCold]

its not my fault that dorian 97 lacks the quality of 99 Chris and Ronnie.

i will post the quote from pete saying how yates was the clear winner.

but you will ignore this bc it contains something positve about dorian.

but when pete talks positively about coleman, he is the ultimate source.  

i know the report is from dec. of 97.  i will post the exact quote later.

[Iceman1981]

more 97

[NarcissisticDeity]

I suggest you read our posts "slower" next time. Then maybe you'll be able to answer correctly. Hypocrite? Look who's talking. You're the biggest 2 face on this board. Example: You've been saying all along that in your opinion yates shouldn't have won in 97, then recently now say that he deserved to win. lol, you're the biggest incompetent a$s around here.

I never said he deserved to win I said he DID WIN with straight firsts , so nice try kid  so you just owned yourself I still maintain he should have lost in 1994 but NOT because I think Nasser was better