ps
having fanastic quads with shitty calves is a lot better than having shitty quads with great (overpowering actually) calves.
the quads are enormous muscle groups.
the calves are minor.
a flaw is a flaw, but some are worse than others.
First of all his quads aren't shitty , you got owned by someone who seen them in person , remember he called you a fucking idiot and a internet-fan-boy
a couple of facts for you sport , Dorian's legs are in proportion , Ronnie's are NOT , Ronnie has gigantic quads that overpower very weak calves , Dorian's calves are world class and his quads are great , and you form a very weak argument when you say his calves overpower his quads its very pathetic , I always laugh at a Coleman fan when they type Dorian's legs are out of balance lol and then have the balls to type Ronnie has better balance lol it shows their level of knowledge which is not much , and having weak calves is a severe liability , especially compared to people who have them , once again weak calves CANNOT be hidden , they are visible in every single mandatory pose from every angle and lower leg balance is contingent on a great set which Ronnie doesn't have , obviously , and what does Arnold Schwarzenegger have to say on the topic of calves?
and what does Bev Francis have to say about Dorian's proportion and symmetry?
Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?
The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .
take a look at a pair of world class legs
you're trapped in your own lame logic Hulkster , pics , quotes and eyewitness accounts all contradict you
