Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3524337 times)

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #23450 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:26:06 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 02:23:27 PM

Because their hams are even but Yates has smaller glutes. The smaller glutes always win.

How can you look at those pics and say that their hams are even? lol, what's the point in replying, when you can't see yates getting crushed in those shots.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23451 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:26:33 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on February 10, 2007, 02:17:08 PM

How can they say yates had better hams and glutes? lol.

Why compare 3 different pics of Coleman's hams to one pic of Yates' hams??? Would you say that is a fair comparison?

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23452 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:30:20 PM »

Quote from the 2000 Olympia commentator "Just look at that ass popping out".

LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #23453 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:31:55 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 02:23:27 PM

Because their hams are even but Yates has smaller glutes. The smaller glutes always win.

wow.

that post is even more gay than this picture... $:-\$

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23454 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:33:43 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 02:31:55 PM

wow.

that post is even more gay than this picture... $:-\$

Just because you want Coleman to put his fat ass in your face and fart in your big mouth.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23455 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:34:25 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on February 10, 2007, 02:17:08 PM

How can they say yates had better hams and glutes? lol.

Never said he had BETTER your problem is you can't stick to the argument I said his hams are comparable and they most certainly are and his glutes are stirated and they're NOT overdeveloped , and they don't stick out , Ronnie and Yates both show separation of the biceps femoris , semitendinosus , semimembranosus , so recall what ' we ' said

Hulkster · « **Reply #23456 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:36:54 PM »

even though Ronnie 2000 was holding water, he was still better than almost any version of dorian, with the exception of 93 and maybe 95

thats simply how good Ronnie was 1998 and beyond

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23457 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:37:55 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on February 10, 2007, 02:22:48 PM

i dont understand are you an ifbb judge or have anything to do with the industry. whats with the fan-boy shit.

The internet-fan-boy comment was directed at Hulkster , because Royalty who seen Dorian in person many times told Hulkster he knows NOTHING about bodybuilding when he claimed Dorian's quads were shitty , he called him an internet-fan and I added the boy

And I'm no judge and I'm not in the industry , I do know the criteria and thats something most of the people commenting on what the judges look for can't say , especially Hulkster

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23458 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:38:41 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 02:30:20 PM

Quote from the 2000 Olympia commentator "Just look at that ass popping out".

LOL

No , Ronnie has better proportion than Dorian lol can't you tell ?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23459 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:39:33 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 02:36:54 PM

even though Ronnie 2000 was holding water, he was still better than almost any version of dorian, with the exception of 93 and maybe 95

thats simply how good Ronnie was 1998 and beyond

and you post a very bad pic of 95 to prove your point lol

Hulkster · « **Reply #23460 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:43:08 PM »

Quote

And I'm no judge and I'm not in the industry

thank fucking god

Hulkster · « **Reply #23461 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:44:33 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 10, 2007, 02:39:33 PM

and you post a very bad pic of 95 to prove your point lol

I thought that pic was from 96?

oh wait I forgot: he looked just as doughy in the upperbody and quads both years...

$:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23462 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:44:50 PM »

Ronnie 2000 and Dorian 1996

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23463 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:45:49 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 02:44:33 PM

I thought that pic was from 96?

oh wait I forgot: he looked just as doughy in the upperbody and quads both years...

$:-\$

Dorian was never ' doughy ' that was Ronnie for most of his career , Dorian didn't hold water

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23464 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:47:57 PM »

Now Ronnie is a soft as it gets , very surprising he won with straight firsts

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23465 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:52:27 PM »

I mean get serious lol

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23466 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:54:48 PM »

It's over Hulkster.

Hulkster · « **Reply #23467 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:58:09 PM »

Ronnie makes dorian look doughy:

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23468 on:** February 10, 2007, 02:59:29 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 02:58:09 PM

Ronnie makes dorian look doughy:

You're the only one who thinks that.

Hulkster · « **Reply #23469 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:03:02 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 02:59:29 PM

You're the only one who thinks that.

and you, ND,and sucky are the only three on the planet that think peak dorian is better than peak Ronnie

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23470 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:10:27 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 03:03:02 PM

and you, ND,and sucky are the only three on the planet that think peak dorian is better than peak Ronnie

What about all the people on DY's official forum who say he is the greatest bodybuilder of all time? You never saw DY in real life that's why I don't value your comments.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23471 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:17:32 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 02:58:09 PM

Ronnie makes dorian look doughy:

I'm not sure whats worse you typing that or you believing that lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23472 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:19:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 03:03:02 PM

and you, ND,and sucky are the only three on the planet that think peak dorian is better than peak Ronnie

88% of Americans believe in angles so I guess because so many people believe in them , they must be right lol your logic always gets you in trouble

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #23473 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:25:35 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 10, 2007, 03:19:13 PM

88% of Americans believe in angles so I guess because so many people believe in them , they must be right lol your logic always gets you in trouble

you meant to say angels. When I first read your post through, I was thinking "believe in angles, wtf?"

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23474 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:26:27 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2007, 03:25:35 PM

you meant to say angels. When I first read your post through, I was thinking "believe in angles, wtf?"

Right !