Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3524446 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #23475 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:28:10 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 10, 2007, 03:19:13 PM

88% of Americans believe in angles so I guess because so many people believe in them , they must be right lol your logic always gets you in trouble

but there is no credible evidence for the existance of angels.

However, there is LOTS of REAL and credible evidence for Ronnie being better:

thus, your analogy, much like your posts, is seriously flawed.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23476 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:34:18 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 03:28:10 PM

but there is no credible evidence for the existance of angels.

However, there is LOTS of REAL and credible evidence for Ronnie being better:

thus, your analogy, much like your posts, is seriously flawed.

No its not seriously flawed its holds true , your think because the masses agree on something it must be true its not and your opinion is NOT evidence kid

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23477 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:43:58 PM »

Why doesn't Ronnie Coleman have a transplant? Is it because he would look worse with a kidney on his head? LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #23478 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:15:59 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 10, 2007, 03:34:18 PM

No its not seriously flawed its holds true , your think because the masses agree on something it must be true its not and your opinion is NOT evidence kid

again, you are an idiot.

the masses agree that ronnie is better because it is a valid, supported and credible stance.

not because they are all idiots like you are trying to make it sound.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23479 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:20:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 04:15:59 PM

again, you are an idiot.

the masses agree that ronnie is better because it is a valid, supported and credible stance.

not because they are all idiots like you are trying to make it sound.

lol the masses

you and a few zealots don't equal the masses and again your opinion is NOT evidence , your opinion is severely flawed , can we value the opinion of someone who claims Dorain was the most overrated bodybuilder of all time? I don't think so , can we value the opinion of someone who claims 2003 was better conditioned than Yates at his prime? lol and can we value the opinion of someone who claims Ronnie 01 was the same size as 1999 despite being anywhere from 10-13 pounds lighter? I mean you people don't know much to form an honest , objective , unbiased opinion .

Hulkster · « **Reply #23480 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:41:34 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 10, 2007, 04:20:53 PM

lol the masses you and a few zealots don't equal the masses and again your opinion is NOT evidence , your opinion is severely flawed , can we value the opinion of someone who claims Dorain was the most overrated bodybuilder of all time? I don't think so , can we value the opinion of someone who claims 2003 was better conditioned than Yates at his prime? lol and can we value the opinion of someone who claims Ronnie 01 was the same size as 1999 despite being anywhere from 10-13 pounds lighter? I mean you people don't know much to form an honest , objective , unbiased opinion .

all of this coming from Mr. Dorian Has Better Overall Arms Than Ronnie...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23481 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:45:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2007, 04:41:34 PM

all of this coming from Mr. Dorian Has Better Overall Arms Than Ronnie...

Better forearms and triceps

your opinion is very limited

davidpaul · « **Reply #23482 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:46:54 PM »

u guys just want to get this thread to 1000 pages so some mag features it haha.

pumpster · « **Reply #23483 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:55:27 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 10, 2007, 04:45:56 PM

Better forearms and triceps your opinion is very limited

It's been proven over and over again that it's a draw on triceps dumbass. ND's very good at playing dumb on this and in general. $:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23484 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:57:10 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on February 10, 2007, 04:55:27 PM

It's been proven over and over again that it's a draw on triceps dumbass. ND's very good at playing dumb on this and in general. $:-\$

LMFAO if this is YOUR idea of a ' draw ' you have much to learn

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #23485 on:** February 10, 2007, 05:00:54 PM »

quite possibly the widest back of all-time.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23486 on:** February 10, 2007, 05:01:48 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2007, 05:00:54 PM

quite possibly the widest back of all-time.

It may be up there but I'd say Orville Burke or Fux may be wider

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #23487 on:** February 10, 2007, 05:02:41 PM »

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #23488 on:** February 10, 2007, 05:40:58 PM »

hey Suckmyasshole, what was that about Flex having better taper from the front than Ronnie?

serpentine007 · « **Reply #23489 on:** February 10, 2007, 05:45:13 PM »

WILL YOU FCKING KILL YOURSELVES ALREADY WITH YOUR FCKING THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hulkster · « **Reply #23490 on:** February 10, 2007, 05:46:34 PM »

I think Ronnie 2003/4 has yet to be equalled for shear back width:

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23491 on:** February 10, 2007, 06:16:21 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2007, 05:00:54 PM

quite possibly the widest back of all-time.

Not wider than Yates. Maybe as wide in 2003 but not wider.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #23492 on:** February 10, 2007, 06:49:33 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 06:16:21 PM

Not wider than Yates. Maybe as wide in 2003 but not wider.

sorry, but Ronnie is still wider.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23493 on:** February 10, 2007, 06:51:40 PM »

Look at all the space between Coleman's arms and lats and he has his hands placed higher:

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23494 on:** February 10, 2007, 06:58:02 PM »

Both in the offseason which makes this a fair comparison IMO:

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #23495 on:** February 10, 2007, 07:08:57 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 06:51:40 PM

Look at all the space between Coleman's arms and lats and he has his hands placed higher:

then according to your logic, this is even wider than off season Dorian.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23496 on:** February 10, 2007, 07:15:02 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2007, 07:08:57 PM

then according to your logic, this is even wider than off season Dorian.

In that shot he has his hands placed about 6 inches higher to hide his weakness. The angle of their elbows says it all.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #23497 on:** February 10, 2007, 07:18:50 PM »

Your boy just got his ass whipped AGAIN. LOL

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #23498 on:** February 10, 2007, 07:27:31 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2007, 07:18:50 PM

Your boy just got his ass whipped AGAIN. LOL

bwahahahaha, you are so f*cking retarded. You cannot use arm space to measure width. Following your logic, pre-93 Dorian and pre-03 Ronnie were at their respective widest.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #23499 on:** February 10, 2007, 07:28:24 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on February 10, 2007, 08:27:39 AM

but nothing that constitutes conditioning is constant for each individual it is constant for the whole human population. hence the reason it can be used.

No, it can't be used, because all Humans show improved muscular separations as their bodyfat drops; however, some show more than others, making the measurement of bodyfat levels using this technique foolish. Sorry.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3524446 times)

suckmymuscle