Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3520495 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23825 on: February 15, 2007, 08:16:24 PM »
hahahahaha...more excuses from the resident trash can.....

Ronnie's 01AC was overrated. Put Ronnie in anything but pitch black lighting (99O, 99GP) and he look smooth like ass.


Resident trash can? lol, that's funny, since you're the only one on here that talks garbage everyday and doesn't even know what side he is on. What side are you on this week? You cry like a bytch when bad photos of yates are posted. So what's your point?

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23826 on: February 15, 2007, 08:19:19 PM »
Show me a pic of yates from the front in the same pose that is better than this shot of Coleman. Simply, you CAN NOT. He is dry, ripped, and seperated from head to toe. Even his abs looks amazing.

Consider yourself owned ;) 15lbs more muscle AND better condition for the Diesel ;)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23827 on: February 15, 2007, 09:14:46 PM »
Incorrect, turd. Taper in the pic I posted is a function of delt-to-waist ratio, so go f**k yourself. An by the way, the size of the pic does nothing to hinder it's veracity in showing whether Flex has better or worse taper than Ronnie. The pic is fine, and that's final. If you don't like it, who cares?

bwahahahahaha, where do you get this shit from? Taper is not a function of delt-to-waist ratio. It's determined by the width of the lats in relation to the waist. If what you say is true, then Paul Dillet has the best taper from the back of all-time. ::)

Quote
No, Dorian's arms were truly 21" onstage at the 1995 Olympia. Ronnie at his biggest had only a 2" size advantage over Dorian, and at the 1999 Olympia the difference was only one inch - which proves that the difference in size was mostly biceps and that their triceps had roughly the same size.

Dorian's arms were never 21" onstage. Even if we entertain your nonsense that they measured 53 cm instead of 52, then they were 20.87 inches. 23" - 20.87" = 2.13" which is greater than 2. ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23828 on: February 16, 2007, 01:37:38 AM »
I keep telling ND that but he keeps claiming it is 96.. ::)

the quote is the giveaway: I'm back refers to rebounding from the injury of 1994..

but no one said ND was smart. :-\

It's 1996 and I'm willing to bet my GetBig account on it are you? I'm willing to bet that pic is from 1996 and if it's not I'll delete my account and if it is you delete yours , deal?  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23829 on: February 16, 2007, 01:56:29 AM »
01 ASC Ronnie matched or exceeded Dorian's best ever conditioning in 95, let alone in 93. The staff at Flex magazine feel the same way. ;)


I'm not disagreeing that Dorian had great conditioning both years. However, as dry and shredded as he was in 93, Ronnie was even better.


I never said a 247 lbs Ronnie would make Dorian look small. My point is that a 10 lbs difference is not much between 93 Dorian and 01 ASC Ronnie, especially when you consider that most of the weight Ronnie lost came from his quads. The rest of him appeared to be just as large as in 99.




Quote
01 ASC Ronnie matched or exceeded Dorian's best ever conditioning in 95, let alone in 93. The staff at Flex magazine feel the same way. ;)

Dorian 1993/1995 the same as far as conditioning was concerned and Ronnie is lucky if he matched it , to claim he surpassed it is junk , and The staff of Flex magazine is posing that was a question and NOT stating  as fact , so nice try but you missed on that one


Quote
I'm not disagreeing that Dorian had great conditioning both years. However, as dry and shredded as he was in 93, Ronnie was even better.

Dorian 1993/1995 were the same as far as conditioning goes , how you made the leap he's not is beyond me and to say Ronnie is comparable in terms of conditioning is one thing to say he's surpassed it is nonsense


Quote
I never said a 247 lbs Ronnie would make Dorian look small. My point is that a 10 lbs difference is not much between 93 Dorian and 01 ASC Ronnie, especially when you consider that most of the weight Ronnie lost came from his quads. The rest of him appeared to be just as large as in 99.

You need the 10 pound difference between the two to not be much because it supports your argument but in reality you're insane , 10 pounds of solid muscle is a huge difference , again just look at the difference between Ronnie 1998 at 250 pounds compared to 1999 with just 7 pounds , don't try to argue a 10 pound difference in Dorian's favor isn't much when you factor in he's one inch shorter its makes a big difference , and the rest of him doesn't appear as large as as 99 , simply not try maybe his arms do but his quads are down , his back is down and so is his pecs and his waist is super small , Ronnie totally dried out gets ' small ' but looks much better for it , Dorian on the other hand totally dried out 1993 was NOT small he was 257 pounds and in 1995 he was 260 pounds big difference , I'm more than willing to admit Ronnie was comparable in terms of conditioning in 01 but to say he was better is just foolish and if you look at the comparisons I made Ronnie actually looks to be down just a tad .

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23830 on: February 16, 2007, 05:03:52 AM »
Major ND ownage on the Bob Chick reality check thread  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=127396.175

Quote
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 15, 2007, 05:00:07 PM
No that isn't a fact its a pathetic attempt , you purposely posted a pic of Dorian not fully flexing his lats in the rear latspread you're like the rest of these biased fools you think you accomplish something with these slanted comparisons and the only thing you accomplish is looking foolish and I've watched the 1991 Mr Olympia Doria has ZERO problems hitting his shots


Yeah I bet your Mr.O tape shows yates flexing his lats all the time because you have the ultimate fanboy yates tape but take a look at this you little fanboy.

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-857488788481175860

And here at 00:51 sec  -------->   http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=7487558590504453675

This will be good, ND the # 1 yates fanboy gets his long overdue reality check.

Zero flexed on the left side.....  stupid n00b mistake

If you say yates flexed both sides of his lats like it should be on this clips then you are a fucking joke.

Everyone can clearly see that he has not flexed the left side of his lats in this clips.
It looks like he needed luck to get it right 1991 

This is not rocket science, just take of your yates fanboy goggles for a moment.

Countdown to the excuses.......4......3.. ...2.... ...

It's not my style to talk crap about a Mr.O, that's your part 

I don't really like yates look, too flat for me, I prefer full round muscles but still I don't talk crap about him.

He was big and he was ripped, imo he has deserved to win the Mr.O 1992,1993 and 1995.

I don't care if yates has done this mistake or any other pro, fact is it's a n00b mistake and why should I not point to it if pobrecito has started the dillet thing ?

You take all way too personal, relax dude.

If someone says something against your hero you start to give him your fanboy crap.
That's the attitude of a true fanboy.

If you think yates was better fine that's your opinion but don't go on the tits of the other guys here if they don't share your opinion.

You should not make fun about guys that use a bowflex, a bowflex would be a big step forward for you 

BTW, the fact that you attack ppl like pumpster and talk crap about his bowflex only because he don't share your opinion shows me what a un-mature nerd you really are.

Pumpster don't like yates so you give him your shit, it's hilarious, fanboys 

Stick with the facts only one time to show that you are not totally retarded.

History =  yates has won 6 Mr.0 titles, haney 8 

Haney has beaten yates in 1991, how often has yates beaten haney ?  I thought so.....   

Too bad for you that your stupid presumptions doesn't mean jackshit.

No matter how hard you try to convince ppl here or in the Truce topic how great yates was with your IFBB judging criteria bullcrap, it really doesn't matter.

You are not a judge, deal with it, it's just your opinion and not more important than the opinions of the other guys here.

Hope that helps.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=127396.175


IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23831 on: February 16, 2007, 07:09:42 AM »
Major ND ownage on the Bob Chick reality check thread  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=127396.175




no matter what anyone else posts, you're still a loser. 

you use a bowflex and pretend to be a training expert.

ronnie, sergio, and robbie are all laughing at you.

imagine you meeting them and telling them about your workouts.

then they ask what gym you belong to (mainly bc they cant think of anything else to say, bc it looks like you've been a POW for years and have never worked out).

imagine their laughter when you say:  "i'm too much of a racist bitch to go to a gym, so i use a bowflex in the basement".

ronnie probably tore both his lat and triceps from laughing so hard at you.

no one is obsessed with you.  you seem to forget the fact what you are and need constant reminding. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23832 on: February 16, 2007, 07:35:53 AM »

no matter what anyone else posts, you're still a loser. 

you use a bowflex and pretend to be a training expert.

ronnie, sergio, and robbie are all laughing at you.

imagine you meeting them and telling them about your workouts.

then they ask what gym you belong to (mainly bc they cant think of anything else to say, bc it looks like you've been a POW for years and have never worked out).

imagine their laughter when you say:  "i'm too much of a racist bitch to go to a gym, so i use a bowflex in the basement".

ronnie probably tore both his lat and triceps from laughing so hard at you.

no one is obsessed with you.  you seem to forget the fact what you are and need constant reminding. 

Damn pumpster you just got owned in grand fashion

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23833 on: February 16, 2007, 09:32:50 AM »
Consider yourself owned ;) 15lbs more muscle AND better condition for the Diesel ;)

You can't own anyone if your life depended on it, lol. Owned? I think not.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23834 on: February 16, 2007, 09:55:11 AM »
You can't own anyone if your life depended on it, lol. Owned? I think not.


why does ronnie's chest look sunken in?
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23835 on: February 16, 2007, 10:19:26 AM »

why does ronnie's chest look sunken in?

It's not sunken in. If you use that brain of yours, you would see that yates is on an angle showing his chest from the side which shows the thickness of the chest. Coleman's pic is taken almost from the front, not showing the side of his thick chest. Wasn't that hard, was it?

You guys keep posting "side" shots of yates mm thinking it's amazing, lol. Why don't you guys post "front" mm pics from contests. Then you will see the major flaws on yates. You guys won't anyway, so I'm just waisting my time asking for them.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23836 on: February 16, 2007, 11:47:03 AM »
It's not sunken in. If you use that brain of yours, you would see that yates is on an angle showing his chest from the side which shows the thickness of the chest. Coleman's pic is taken almost from the front, not showing the side of his thick chest. Wasn't that hard, was it?


pathetic excuses.

coleman is straight on and that's why his chest is sunken in?

that's almost as retarted as training on a bowflex and thinking you are an expert.

notice these 2 examples to prove you wrong.

again:






notice how the chests are sunken in.

your reply is def. in the top 6 of most retarted comments on this thread.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23837 on: February 16, 2007, 12:20:38 PM »
Sunken in man

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23838 on: February 16, 2007, 12:32:08 PM »
SUCKY

the long posts in our argument make it pointless.


i said that seperations,cuts and striations can be used to decipher bf and water levels. you said they did not.

however, you claim that dorian was at 3%(ill be it with no proof, seems like your just making up the number) and dryer then ronnie.

how do you know dorian is dryer or has lower bf then ronnie?

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23839 on: February 16, 2007, 01:15:46 PM »
Sunken in man

wow.

Iceman, extreme ownage.

any other good points you want to make?
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23840 on: February 16, 2007, 02:31:52 PM »
Ronnie was never this fucking dry or conditioned...I mean just look at the fucking veins popping out of Diesel's back! 1995 Dorian was hands down, the greatest overall condition ever seen.

god damn you are so easy to prove wrong:

do you not realize that there is a very good reason why you claimed Ronnie was the greatest ever?

well, this is one of them, and its owns your dorian back shot in every conceivable characteristic:

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23841 on: February 16, 2007, 02:34:14 PM »
hahahahaha...more excuses from the resident trash can.....

Ronnie's 01AC was overrated. Put Ronnie in anything but pitch black lighting (99O, 99GP) and he look smooth like ass.



its amazing how much of a troll you are.

here is a shot in BRIGHT lighting from the AC and he looks amazing: far better than dorian ever did from the front.

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23842 on: February 16, 2007, 02:35:55 PM »
god damn you are so easy to prove wrong:

do you not realize that there is a very good reason why you claimed Ronnie was the greatest ever?

well, this is one of them, and its owns your dorian back shot in every conceivable characteristic:



No it doesn't where is his shredded lats? where is his shredded x-mas tree? where are his two calves? where is his balance ? please answer these questions before you claim he owns Dorian's back shot in every conceivable characteristic , oh wait you can't and haven't bee able to for almost 1k pages

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23843 on: February 16, 2007, 02:43:48 PM »
LOL

where is dorian's lower back thickness?

where are dorian's hamstring detail?

where is dorian's right ARM?

Where is dorian's great taper?

Where are dorian's glutes?

Where is dorian's back detail compared to Ronnie?

Dorian is getting owned everywhere.

Flower Boy Ran Away

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23844 on: February 16, 2007, 02:46:38 PM »
LOL

where is dorian's lower back thickness?

where are dorian's hamstring detail?

where is dorian's right ARM?

Where is dorian's great taper?

Where are dorian's glutes?

Where is dorian's back detail compared to Ronnie?

Dorian is getting owned everywhere.




story of your life:  wrong again.

this is why ronnie SAID yates has the best back of all time.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23845 on: February 16, 2007, 02:48:04 PM »
LOL

where is dorian's lower back thickness?

where are dorian's hamstring detail?

where is dorian's right ARM?

Where is dorian's great taper?

Where are dorian's glutes?

Where is dorian's back detail compared to Ronnie?

Dorian is getting owned everywhere.



meltdown  ;)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23846 on: February 16, 2007, 02:48:42 PM »
meltdown  ;)

reality.

dorian only owns ronnie in that shot from the knees on down. its not much.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23847 on: February 16, 2007, 02:49:44 PM »
Hulkster put your money where your mouth is , this pic is 1996 if its not I'll delete my account if it is you delete yours  ;) deal?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83346
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23848 on: February 16, 2007, 02:50:25 PM »
reality.

dorian only owns ronnie in that shot from the knees on down. its not much.

meltdown part II

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #23849 on: February 16, 2007, 02:56:05 PM »
reality.

dorian only owns ronnie in that shot from the knees on down. its not much.

the only area where coleman wins is biceps peaks and hamstring cuts. 

yates has a thicker, harder, and more seperated back.

xmas tree with lateral striations in the bdb pose.

calves

and a better taper bc his taper isnt 12 inches long like ronnies.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)