He's even willing to share contest footage with "el cheapo" ND, just to avoid more of the same excuses.. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's how his lats have looked at the compulsories and in certain parts of the show.
He couldn't flex both sides of his lats right a few times and if you would own the 1991 Mr.O DVD you would know that.
I'm not a guy like you, I have just pointed out that yates was also not able to flex both sides of his lats 1991 *all* the time like you would expect from a professional bodybuilder so please shut up
If you don't believe me watch the Mr.O DVD again, then you will see that I'm right and you are dead wrong like most of the times LOL!!!!
If you were to cheap to buy the tape/DVD back in the days I'll upload the parts for you BTW, Imo yates should have only won 1992,1993 and 1995, he did not fully deserve the rest of his wins.- 1992 he was the next big guy so it was ok to give him the Mr.O.
- 1993 he was better conditioned and bigger than ever so also a deserved win.
- 1994 with his bizeps tear in combination with his terrible cow belly he did not fully deserve the Mr.O imo and it was dead wrong to award him with perfect scores.- 1995 he was back in shape, bigger and harder then ever, just his bizeps tear was a little problem but still he has fully deserved to win in 1995.
- 1996 and 1997, yates was just a messed up GH project, he had paid the ultimate prize for the exzessive GH abuse.....
Yates has messed up bodybuilding forever cause he was Mr.O and many of the other pros thought lets copy his **winning formula**
In no way he has deserved to win 1996 and 97.
94 is still debatable but even the biggest yates guy should be ashamed to claim that yates has deserved to win 1996/97...
To give him perfect scores in 1996 and 97 was a big joke 
