Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3524892 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24450 on: February 19, 2007, 07:55:42 PM »
03 Ronnie's back would make 93 Dorian's look small.







countdown to excuses... 3... 2... 1...



NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24451 on: February 19, 2007, 07:57:47 PM »
I agree with you... ;)

Ooooooooooh, you sure owned me with this little pic. ::)




suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24452 on: February 19, 2007, 08:01:36 PM »
Ooooooooooh, you sure owned me with this little pic. ::)



  But you can tell the difference in size between an arm that's 20.87" and one that's 21" but can't see the little pic? I think not! ;D ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24453 on: February 19, 2007, 08:07:10 PM »
I'm sorry, but Ronnie is just fucking owned here again.

It's called the front lat spread.

Ronnie's lats are invisible compared to Diesel's.

Everything just flows better on Yates pose.



lol. Until you have a good answer to this pic, don't reply. First of all Coleman has better seperation, striations, arms, chest, delts, quads etc. Yates lats look bigger but he has less seperation, less striations, small chest, small and smooth quads, small chest and arms. Also, Colemans traps are way bigger and thicker than his in this pose. Plus he looks soft all over. So how the hell is yates winning this pose?

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24454 on: February 19, 2007, 08:12:17 PM »
lol. Until you have a good answer to this pic, don't reply. First of all Coleman has better seperation, striations, arms, chest, delts, quads etc. Yates lats look bigger but he has less seperation, less striations, small chest, small and smooth quads, small chest and arms. Also, Colemans traps are way bigger and thicker than his in this pose. Plus he looks soft all over. So how the hell is yates winning this pose?

The pose is meant to show off the lats, more so than any other mandatory emphasizes a single bodypart.

Ronnie's lats are tiny compared to Yates.

Yates crushes Ronnie in this pose just like he did every time they met on stage.

Hope that helps.




pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24455 on: February 19, 2007, 08:20:47 PM »
Dorian owns that pose right there, my two cents

And mind you, that is Yates in July of 1992, 1 full year before he forever changed the sport.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24456 on: February 19, 2007, 08:22:44 PM »

  Sperm, you idiot f.a.g.g.o.t, check out the beggining of the video, when they're both standing relaxed from the front and Wheeler has clearly a better taper. You just got owned again by yours truly. ;)

  www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSQR7ENflq8&mode=related&search=

SUCKMYMUSCLE

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24457 on: February 19, 2007, 08:23:10 PM »
I'm sorry, but Ronnie is just fucking owned here again.

It's called the front lat spread.

Ronnie's lats are invisible compared to Diesel's.

Everything just flows better on Yates pose.



First time posting aything worthwhile on this thread. My gola is to be on page 1000.  But Dorian blows Coleman away in this pose.  

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24458 on: February 19, 2007, 08:30:28 PM »
  Board, listen up. I did say that Dorian's arms at their biggest were 21", and whether that's 53 or 54 centimeters is all the same to me, since either 53 or 54 centimeters are closer to 21" than to any other rounded number. I'm making this very clear to everyone.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24459 on: February 19, 2007, 08:33:51 PM »
here is a better front lat spread comparison.


pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24460 on: February 19, 2007, 08:38:13 PM »
here is a better front lat spread comparison.



Why is it a better comparison? Becuase Ronnie is in black and white in a perfect studio shot?

Oh and Ronnie is still getting his ass handed to him. His lats are invisible.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24461 on: February 19, 2007, 08:51:43 PM »
Why is it a better comparison? Becuase Ronnie is in black and white in a perfect studio shot?

it's a better comparison b/c both pics are taken from almost the same angle (i.e. straight on) and each bodybuilder is in contest condition. It's also scaled more accurately.

Quote
Oh and Ronnie is still getting his ass handed to him. His lats are invisible.

actually, Ronnie is beating Dorian in that comparison if we use the IFBB criteria. Ronnie has arms in proportion to his torso, his traps are more visible, better taper, and more definition from top to bottom.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24462 on: February 19, 2007, 09:06:46 PM »
it's a better comparison b/c both pics are taken from almost the same angle (i.e. straight on) and each bodybuilder is in contest condition. It's also scaled more accurately.

Both shots are straight on here. Also, Dorian is 8 weeks out here and Ronnie is 2 weeks out. That's an advantage for Ronnie. Nevertheless, Ronnie still loses the pose. Dorian is the king of the front and rear lat spreads....and you have just been owned :)


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24463 on: February 19, 2007, 09:12:36 PM »
Both shots are straight on here. Also, Dorian is 8 weeks out here and Ronnie is 2 weeks out. That's an advantage for Ronnie. Nevertheless, Ronnie still loses the pose. Dorian is the king of the front and rear lat spreads....and you have just been owned

not really, I just posted a more accurate comparison. The only reason you prefer the comparison Iceman made is b/c Dorian's pic is taken from an angle that heavily favors his lats. ;)

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24464 on: February 19, 2007, 09:12:49 PM »
Jack of all trades, master of virtually none..dubious honor of both one of the worst MMs in BB history & one of the most mediocre, boring double-bis in BB history even pre-tear. Great for a powerlifter. :o


i finally agree with you.  

on some points.

as you know, any contest, let alone the olympia, is not decided on a few poses (or the ones that coleman looks great in and yates mediocre).

as far as dorian's double biceps, i think it was great pre tear.  his arms weren the best in that shot (even pre tear), but his torso was.

i dont think there has been a mr. olympia where he has looked amazing/unbeatable in EVERY mandatory or non - mandatory pose.  

cutler looks great in all of the mandatories, but his overall quality aint anywhere close to doz or ronnie.  
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24465 on: February 19, 2007, 09:25:55 PM »
lol. Until you have a good answer to this pic, don't reply. First of all Coleman has better seperation, striations, arms, chest, delts, quads etc. Yates lats look bigger but he has less seperation, less striations, small chest, small and smooth quads, small chest and arms. Also, Colemans traps are way bigger and thicker than his in this pose. Plus he looks soft all over. So how the hell is yates winning this pose?
yates lifts his chest when doing the pose correctly. ronnie is more straight up and down, so ofcourse you will see the traps more.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24466 on: February 20, 2007, 01:41:53 AM »
Ronnie's back was better at the 01 ASC, and you know it. Peter McGough even commented about how dry and shredded he looked. So it's deceitful to use a 99 issue of Flex magazine to support your argument. It would be like using a quote from 91 to argue why Lee Haney's back is better than Dorian's.

Ronnie's back wasn't better in 01 not by a long shot comparable in terms of hardness and comes close in detail  but not thickness or width , Ronnie's back for him is small in 01 he was just 247 pounds if you're lucky , Yates at 260 pounds crushes Ronnie in every aspect of the back , again he has advantages Ronnie doesn't

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24467 on: February 20, 2007, 01:45:33 AM »
Ronnie owned yet again hahahahah



This was a great post !!  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24468 on: February 20, 2007, 01:47:26 AM »
LOL, here come the quotes. Get real man.

I don't know whats funny you posting this or you posting this thinking Ronnie is beating him in this shot lol either severe self-ownage lol your dumbest post thus far  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24469 on: February 20, 2007, 01:59:16 AM »
maybe if this were a contest to see who has the smallest arms, but I don't see how Dorian is owning Ronnie here.



Monster self ownage Dorian's perhaps matches Ronnie on width , and destroys him utterly on hardness , dryness , detail and density NO CONTEST and among your dumbest posts when confronted with a Yates' almost as big despite being down 17 pounds and being much harder you point to the blatantly obvious fact that Dorian has smaller arms lol you're of this fantasy that 2003 would make Yates looks small when in fact a 318 pound Ferrigno and a 285 pound Dillett couldn't so stick to making fantasy comparisons of Ronnie dwarfing Dorian because thats the only way its going to happen  ;)


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24470 on: February 20, 2007, 02:00:55 AM »
Ronnie's back wasn't better in 01 not by a long shot comparable in terms of hardness and comes close in detail  but not thickness or width , Ronnie's back for him is small in 01 he was just 247 pounds if you're lucky , Yates at 260 pounds crushes Ronnie in every aspect of the back , again he has advantages Ronnie doesn't

damn boy, do I have to keep correcting you every time you respond to me? I said Ronnie's back was better at the 01 ASC than in 99. This nullifies your 99 Team Flex reference since they had no way of teleporting to the future. In regards to your post, I feel that Ronnie's back at the 01 ASC was just as good as Dorian's. Ronnie had more thickness and better taper while Dorian had slightly more detail. It comes down to personal preference. I'm being generous here since many feel that Ronnie's back was better, including Peter McGough.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24471 on: February 20, 2007, 02:10:29 AM »
Monster self ownage Dorian's perhaps matches Ronnie on width , and destroys him utterly on hardness , dryness , detail and density NO CONTEST and among your dumbest posts when confronted with a Yates' almost as big despite being down 17 pounds and being much harder you point to the blatantly obvious fact that Dorian has smaller arms lol

self ownage? Dorian is lucky to match Ronnie in width in that pic, and his glutes literally look smooth as a baby's ass. Furthermore, Dorian has those ridiculous looking twig arms which completely ruin that pose.

Quote
you're of this fantasy that 2003 would make Yates looks small when in fact a 318 pound Ferrigno and a 285 pound Dillett couldn't so stick to making fantasy comparisons of Ronnie dwarfing Dorian because thats the only way its going to happen

ha ha ha ha, Lou Ferrigno and Paul Dillet did make Dorian look small. ;)




Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9911
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24472 on: February 20, 2007, 05:12:49 AM »
retard alert more conditioned? LMFAO kid go away and come back when you learn

dorian has fat rolls on his ass. dude, you need to stop making blanket statements and false claims. i dont care who said dorian was ripped, or what you beleive if you cant see that ronnie is more ripped, and twice as thick your extremely biased. simple as that. the evidence is right in front of you.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9911
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24473 on: February 20, 2007, 05:24:09 AM »
delts to waist does not taper. waist is one measurment, width of shoulders another how does that taper? to have taper you wouold have to have a gradual incline, hence the lats, they get wider as you approach the shoulders thus creating taper.

again according your you definition dillet had the best taper or toney freeman. this agian is wrong, melvin anthony has better taper then both yet isnt as wide. the reason being his lats flare much more coupled with a small waist.


there is no gradual incline from waist(one measurement) to delts(second measurement).


IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24474 on: February 20, 2007, 06:39:32 AM »


ha ha ha ha, Lou Ferrigno and Paul Dillet did make Dorian look small. ;)



so there goes hulkster's claim that yates only won bc he was the biggest. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)