ND likes to pic and choose quotes, and will take peoples word over pics that reveal otherwise.
its like taking a picture of a square, and people there say its a triangle but the picture shows a square. you then accept its a triangle even though the pictures show otherwise, thats what your asking everyone to beleive. the pics of ronnie are obliterating dorian in conditioning, the 02 pics especially, ive never seen legs so conditioned acutally, platz like with the detail deep and high on the thighs.
ND is like a little kid, the pics show otherwise, did peter view these pics, or did he view every one of ronnies victories? if not the statement is invalid.
another example, if peter hasnt witnessed every bodybuilder, before, after a show then the comment, "hasnt been surpassed is empty" because he isnt comparing it to anything.
how can you argue that the conditioning hasnt been surpassed(a triangle) when the pics show otherwise(a square).