show me where I said that 01 ASC Ronnie was wider than 95 Dorian. You can't b/c you keep making that shit up. I don't know what's more pathetic - the fact that you have the reading comprehension of a 5 yr old or that you're so delusional that you're convinced Dorian was actually bigger than Paul Dillet and Lou Ferrigno.
this pic is from 96 and shows Ronnie and Dorian were the same width. Again, this is a direct comparison. 
it's safe to say that Ronnie added more back size from 96 to 01. Now, Dorian was slightly wider in 95 b/c he wasn't as dry and flat. This would put both of them at virtually the same exact width.
I just quoted someone who knows a hell of a lot more than you about bodybuilding criteria as saying that Ronnie looked 20 lbs heavier than 247 lbs at the 01 ASC. Peter McGough also said that Ronnie looked superbig at the Arnold. I find it laughable that you purport to know more than both these guys by suggesting that Ronnie was small.
Dorian's arms most certainly looked like twigs on a barrel. On top of that, he had a f*cking torn biceps. The best bodybuilder on the planet should not have a torn muscle.
show me where I said that 01 ASC Ronnie was wider than 95 Dorian. You can't b/c you keep making that shit up. I don't know what's more pathetic - the fact that you have the reading comprehension of a 5 yr old or that you're so delusional that you're convinced Dorian was actually bigger than Paul Dillet and Lou Ferrigno.
this pic is from 96 and shows Ronnie and Dorian were the same width. Again, this is a direct comparison.
Wide , just as wide same stupid statement !and the pot calling the kettle black
I never claimed Dorian was BIGGER I said the judge said despite NOT weighing as much he APPEARED the biggest man on-stage , and to use your own quote against you
Flex Magazine, August 2005 - Peter McGough
"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig)." ( damn you're owned )
and the ' direct comparison isn't so direct , especially considering Dorian is furthest from the camera and Ronnis is closest , couple that with Dorian doing the pose correctly and Ronnie not ( as usual ) and his small waist helping with the ILLUSION of greater width and your ' direct ' comparisons is anything BUT
it's safe to say that Ronnie added more back size from 96 to 01. Now, Dorian was slightly wider in 95 b/c he wasn't as dry and flat. This would put both of them at virtually the same exact width.
Oh Ronnie did add more back his back was much wider and fuller in 99 and in 00 but both occasions he wasn't super dry or superhard , your dry Ronnie out and he gets very lean and hard i.e. 1998/2001 remember 1996 Ronnie was 250 pounds and in 1998 he was 249 pounds and 2001 247 pounds the dimensions aren't going to change for the better by getting lighter , and Dorian was just as dry in 1995 as he was in 1996 to say width is equal despite Dorian being 13 pounds heavier is wishful thinking , as you're so fond of saying most of Dorian's size is in his torso
I just quoted someone who knows a hell of a lot more than you about bodybuilding criteria as saying that Ronnie looked 20 lbs heavier than 247 lbs at the 01 ASC. Peter McGough also said that Ronnie looked superbig at the Arnold. I find it laughable that you purport to know more than both these guys by suggesting that Ronnie was small.
You're missing the boat kid , they both said he LOOKED big and he wasn't big he only appeared so , and compared to 1999 and 2000 he was small and noticeably more narrow , I agreed with them and I added Peter said the same thing in 1998 Ronnie looked bigger than his 249 pounds , that doesn't change the fact he wasn't bigger and he was noticeably smaller than his 1999 and 2000 Mr Olympia appearences and I agree when you're supersharp you appeared superbig , like Dorian in 1995 who was supersharp and superbig so he would appear so even more so , 1995 Dorian was 260 pounds and Nasser was what 275? you'd never know Nasser outweighed Dorian
Dorian's arms most certainly looked like twigs on a barrel. On top of that, he had a f*cking torn biceps. The best bodybuilder on the planet should not have a torn muscle.
Depending on the angle Dorian's arms can look small but are they? NO especially in 1995 ( check the pics ) and its your opinion that the best bodybuilding on the planet should not have a torn muscle , but using your own nonsense against you ( again ) I posted a quote of a judge specifically stating Dorian's torn biceps was a ' minor injury ' and " made no overall difference ' so do you presume to know more than an IFBB judge?
Again the dumbest post you ever made was saying Ronnie at 247 pounds had a back , just as wide , and thicker than Dorian at 260 pounds
