You sure?
Nope not true , I've already said a LONG time ago Ronnie 2003 might win just based on the size advantage alone , old news Again maybe Ronnie 2003 would win maybe he does have a ' better package ' I doubt I think Dorian at 269 is simply much better than Ronnie he has 95% of Ronnie's size , and better conditioning , balance & proportion and density I think that would be enough , maybe I'm wrong and then again maybe I'm not
dorian at 269? are you speaking of his 93 pics from a few weeks out?god I hope not.a pre contest yates could never ever beat an in contest shape 2003 Ronnie...look at Ronnie's arms just dwarfing GUNTER'S..can you IMAGINE what DORIAN'S arms would look like onstage next to this? you would not even be able to see them
ND's little friend has arrived...
"other back poses" are not the mandatory back lat spread that dorian would lose to ronnie as a result of loose skin being clearly and glaringly evident.
and you haven't beat me with quotes , please post the quotes that say Ronnie had better conditioning than Dorian , better density than Dorian , better balance & proportion than Dorian is more complete than Dorian , you've yet to counter my original argument , keep fishing for imaginary advantages like wrinkles and taper lol you need them
irrelevant, this discussion is "who would win if Ronnie and Dorian both competed against each other at their respective primes?" - NOT "who is the most conditioned?" or "who is the most balanced?"
Oh boy wow Ronnie had bigger arms that means he's the best lol Dorian would walk all over Ronnie 2003 in terms of conditioned size , density , balance and posing
Delta did own me most certainly and I apologized and please this nonsense with the loose skin is just pathetic these pics of Dorian in the rear latspread have been posted for eons now and all the sudden you guys need advantages and harped on this , its laughable I mean it really is and you haven't beat me with quotes , please post the quotes that say Ronnie had better conditioning than Dorian , better density than Dorian , better balance & proportion than Dorian is more complete than Dorian , you've yet to counter my original argument , keep fishing for imaginary advantages like wrinkles and taper lol you need them
03 Ronnie makes him look like the marshmallow man.
03 Ronnie makes him look like the marshmallow man
Sure , sure I don't know whats worse you typing this nonsense or you believing this nonsense lol
It's been mentioned before that yates has loose skin, but you try to play it off. We all know Coleman has small calves compared to yates, but you don't see most of us trying to play it off. You claim yates has no water or fat and we show you the opposite and you want us to leave it alone? Guess again if you're thinking that way.
so does Ronnie 99!:count down to the excuses..5..4...3..2..1. ..
Dorian has the clear advantage in hardness & in dryness , no questions about it , couple that with balance & proportion and density and better poser its safe to assume Ronnie would lose.
Insanely stupid post , not very well thought out ( among others ) F.Y.I. conditioning is part of the criteria the judged determine who is better , as is balance , as is density , as is size lol these all add up to determine who is better and the criteria leans Yates way
See you can't reply to my post with a simple answer. You're getting pissed. That's why you're replying to all of our posts with the same bull. In case you haven't noticed, I'm not the only one that thinks this? Just look around.
lol sure , sure
I've had what I've said confirmed 5 times over about Dorian's conditioning being outstanding , I'll entertain you futher when you can do the same about this nonsense
No I'm laughing at your nonsense I have nothing to be pissed about , I'm not the one ice-skating up-hill with Dorian has loose skin I could careless about this comment thats how absurd it is lol
