Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3515701 times)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25225 on: February 24, 2007, 10:52:14 PM »
No argument from me about that last statement.

But what were better, Ronnie's arms or Dorian's calves?

I would put money on Dorian's calves being 24"

dumbest statement of this thread yet. There's no way in hell Dorian's calves were larger than Ronnie's arms in the offseason.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25226 on: February 24, 2007, 11:13:50 PM »
dumbest statement of this thread yet. There's no way in hell Dorian's calves were larger than Ronnie's arms in the offseason.

hahahahahah moron.

Someone obviously hasn't seen Dorian's training video ;)

Diesel's calves were easily over 24"

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25227 on: February 24, 2007, 11:19:03 PM »
Dorian did 1400lb calf raises.

No way Ronnie could curl that much.

Dorian's calves > Ronnie's arms

hahahahahahahahahahahah

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25228 on: February 24, 2007, 11:36:41 PM »
Dorian did 1400lb calf raises.

No way Ronnie could curl that much.

Dorian's calves > Ronnie's arms

hahahahahahahahahahahah

wow, talk about monster self-ownage. The masseter (jaw muscle) is one of the strongest muscles in the body - capable of exceeding 900 lbs of pressure - yet it's smaller than the biceps. What's your point?

apk19

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 28
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25229 on: February 25, 2007, 05:53:18 AM »
ND: Do you know the incremental weight differences for all of Yates' competitions? I was watching Blood and Guts and it seems to me that he was progressively heavier for every comp he entered. Quite shocking that he could keep his conditioning so consistent considering he kept increasing his mass.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83339
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25230 on: February 25, 2007, 06:48:41 AM »
way to avoid the question. i accept your defeat.

yes this is exactly what im saying, that in CERTAIN poses he has loose skin. this holds true for alot of bodybuilders. titus titties didnt look like they had loose skin till he flexed them. many other examples are out there. also, the wrinkles of skin on the tri are on the very inside and under arm, so please dont post a side tri. also the majority of bodybuilders have loose skin there, as a result of the pose.

the skin is wrinkled in the lat spread, you agreed. the skin is wrinkled in the tri in this pose, its right there for you to see. how can you deny it, everyone can see it.

im not arguing that its a disadvantage or advantage or anything. im just correcting you that hulkster and co are right, it is loose skin on the lower back. jay has it also. are you suggesting that jay somehow has loose skin while dorian has wrinkles? lol give me a break its the same thing. dorian is not special(youd like to believe that he has super powers) he has the same thing cutler has, but to a lesser degree. cutler also doest have the loose skin to the same extent when showing the christmas tree, further proof that it is the same thing.

so basically ive shown, pic evidence, logical arguments and analogies to prove my point. but you just wont accept it because you beleive dorian had the best conditioning seen, and never had one conditioning flaw. while others like lee priest have ripped upper bodies, and soft legs. or ronnies has crazy conditioned arms and less detailed calves. somehow dorian has uniform conditioning on every inch and this fact disproves picture evidence that everyone can clearly see. i dont care who said what, if you can see something to the opposite, they are wrong. reality doesnt change because of status.

please admit your wrong, or your cred is shot. and your doing the same thing you accuse everyone else of doing, being completely biased and unwilling to listen to reason.

i can see ronnies flaws.

shitty abs.
side tri is lacking
bad calves.
gut at some points(dorian also had one, the mandatories are all that matter)
his lower back wasnt as dry as dorians.

but im willing to listen to reason, and if you put a photo in front of me showing ronnies distention, i wouldnt put up a quote saying he didnt because the quote is wrong. i can see it for myself. maybe the person never saw this photo, is a friend of ronnies, didnt comment on it, is biased, didnt want negativity. the fact is that the picture shows loose skin, you cant convince me that it doesnt because reality, THE PIC does. the pic is not adding something, its just showing whats there at that particular time.



Quote
way to avoid the question. i accept your defeat.

yes this is exactly what im saying, that in CERTAIN poses he has loose skin. this holds true for alot of bodybuilders. titus titties didnt look like they had loose skin till he flexed them. many other examples are out there. also, the wrinkles of skin on the tri are on the very inside and under arm, so please dont post a side tri. also the majority of bodybuilders have loose skin there, as a result of the pose.


No I posed the question and you keep avoiding it  ;) and give me a break with this nonsense already Dorian doesn't hold water period , end of sentence if you want to believe that knock yourself out , you're the same genius who in the same breathe will say Coleman 2003 has better conditioning than Dorian its garbage you don't know what you're talking about , wrinkles don't mean he has loose skin , or he's holding water or fat it simply doesn't they're wrinkles in muscle , just like they're are in the triceps when he does the rear latspread

Quote
im not arguing that its a disadvantage or advantage or anything. im just correcting you that hulkster and co are right, it is loose skin on the lower back. jay has it also. are you suggesting that jay somehow has loose skin while dorian has wrinkles? lol give me a break its the same thing. dorian is not special(youd like to believe that he has super powers) he has the same thing cutler has, but to a lesser degree. cutler also doest have the loose skin to the same extent when showing the christmas tree, further proof that it is the same thing.

Bad analogy Cutler isn't Yates and isn't known for his conditioning , I can find quotes saying Jay as soft , etc you can't find quotes saying Dorian was a little soft , and Jay doesn't have a christmas tree so how can it disappear when he doesn't even have one? and I don't care if you think its an advantage or disadvantage its nonsense

Quote
so basically ive shown, pic evidence, logical arguments and analogies to prove my point. but you just wont accept it because you beleive dorian had the best conditioning seen, and never had one conditioning flaw. while others like lee priest have ripped upper bodies, and soft legs. or ronnies has crazy conditioned arms and less detailed calves. somehow dorian has uniform conditioning on every inch and this fact disproves picture evidence that everyone can clearly see. i dont care who said what, if you can see something to the opposite, they are wrong. reality doesnt change because of status.

No you've shown a couple of pictures of Dorian at his finest with wrinkles in his lower back and being so desperate to prove your case that Ronnie 2003 is better conditioning than Dorian you made a leap into the absurd and claimed he's had loose skin , again if you claim the wrinkles in Dorian's lower back , then you have to say the same think about his triceps and its just stupid , and again you're presuming to speak for me I never once claimed Dorian was the ' best conditioning seen ' he's the best conditioning seen on a 260 pound bodybuilder , Dorian is known for his size and crazy conditioning , not crazy conditioning in his lower back or his midsection , everywhere Dorian never had a problem with getting conditioned for a show , it's very easy to be ripped when you're 200 pounds , extremely difficult to replicate that at 260 pounds , ask Ronnie whenever he went over 250 pounds his conditioning suffered for it , while Dorian has been as high as 270 pounds and rokc hard , and you keep posting pictures of Dorian at his finest to boot 1993 and 1995 these are among his biggest and best conditioned years and then have the balls to type he has loose , skin , fat or water or worse all lol its laughable

Quote
please admit your wrong, or your cred is shot. and your doing the same thing you accuse everyone else of doing, being completely biased and unwilling to listen to reason.

i can see ronnies flaws.

shitty abs.
side tri is lacking
bad calves.
gut at some points(dorian also had one, the mandatories are all that matter)
his lower back wasnt as dry as dorians.

Oh these guys have been screaming my " Get-Big cred ' has been shot for years now lol who cares? and you have the balls to type that after you typed Ronnie 2003 is better conditioned than Dorian lol and you're worrying about my ' cred ' lol worry about yourself  ;) and you forget to add somethings to Ronnie's flaws , like bad balance and proportion , lack of Yates-type density , questionable conditioning over most of his career , poor poser , and his lower back wasn't as dry as Dorian's? his lower lats weren't as shredded as Dorian's either but its all a matter of semantics

Quote
but im willing to listen to reason, and if you put a photo in front of me showing ronnies distention, i wouldnt put up a quote saying he didnt because the quote is wrong. i can see it for myself. maybe the person never saw this photo, is a friend of ronnies, didnt comment on it, is biased, didnt want negativity. the fact is that the picture shows loose skin, you cant convince me that it doesnt because reality, THE PIC does. the pic is not adding something, its just showing whats there at that particular time.

No this isn't a case of a gut and not having a gut its not that clear cut , you guys post a picture that has been posted for months and months now , NONE of you ever uttered a word about loose skin ever , someone who looking for an angle decided hey this might work and gave it a shot and all the other sheep followed , and its the most laughable thing you guys have come up with , Dorian's lower back has always been one the the driest ever seen on-stage period and if he was ever holding water or fat or loose skin there would have been a mention of it in a contest report , ever wonder why? because there is none he's as bone dry as a human can be

And you've still yet to explain the wrinkles in Dorian's triceps if you say they're just wrinkles and NOT loose skin you own yourself , why? because how can the wrinkles in his lower back be loose skin and the wrinkles on his triceps NOT ? they can't and if you say they are loose skin on his triceps you played yourself again , because now not only is Dorian holding water and fat in the form of loose skin in his lower back he's also holding it in both arms now lol insanely stupid to suggest but you've proven yourself fond of such stupidity

If the wrinkles on his triceps can be just that so can the wrinkles on his back , if you say he can have wrinkles in his lower back thats loose skin and the wrinkles in his triceps aren't your fucked , so nice try and come back when you find a new crack or crevice to knitpick and claim its some dent in Dorian's armor lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83339
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25231 on: February 25, 2007, 06:50:20 AM »
ND: Do you know the incremental weight differences for all of Yates' competitions? I was watching Blood and Guts and it seems to me that he was progressively heavier for every comp he entered. Quite shocking that he could keep his conditioning so consistent considering he kept increasing his mass.

1992 - 242 pounds
1993 - 257 pounds
1994 - 262 pounds
1995 - 260 pounds
1996 - 257 pounds
1997 - 266 pounds ( 270 at the night show )

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25232 on: February 25, 2007, 07:01:16 AM »
ND, you just completely mis-interpreted everything i said. so ill try agian.

look dummy. i never even mentioned ronnie 03 in my reply i dont know why you keep saying that. ronnie was more conditioned in particular areas then dorian in 03. the hams, glutes, quads, and arms. you could also argue delts and chest. post pic by pic comparison if you like of dorian from one contest and ronnie 03. his back was not as conditioned.

wrinkles are the same thing as loose skin you giant moron. whats the difference. yes dorian had fat on his lower back in the lat spread. the pic shows this. your quote doesnt change reality. hmmm see how jay has loose skin in the lat spread but not showing the christmas tree. gasp same as dorian. but you'd like us to beleive that what dorian had was totally different hahah. dorian was conditioned, he did have great condition. but your quotes arent adressing his lower back in the lat spread. agian meaningless. even if they were im wouldnt agree because i also have things called eyes like the other person and can see loose skin. unless he is a dermatologist who can explain why that is not loose skin, you can shove the quote up your ass.




Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25233 on: February 25, 2007, 07:03:17 AM »
haha your fucked, your down to arguing against reality, and that wrinkles which you've admitted were there are not loose skin ahahahahhahahhaha.


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25234 on: February 25, 2007, 07:05:17 AM »
jay also has some loose skin on his rear delt dorian doesnt have, is it all coming together for you know.



also post a shot were dorians, arms, delts or pecs are this conditioned.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25235 on: February 25, 2007, 07:06:28 AM »
or apic were his glutes and hams are this conditioned. from one contest not all over the place. funny thing is there are better pics of his glutes and hams, but they are still shredded.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83339
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25236 on: February 25, 2007, 07:08:53 AM »
ND, you just completely mis-interpreted everything i said. so ill try agian.

look dummy. i never even mentioned ronnie 03 in my reply i dont know why you keep saying that. ronnie was more conditioned in particular areas then dorian in 03. the hams, glutes, quads, and arms. you could also argue delts and chest. post pic by pic comparison if you like of dorian from one contest and ronnie 03. his back was not as conditioned.

wrinkles are the same thing as loose skin you giant moron. whats the difference. yes dorian had fat on his lower back in the lat spread. the pic shows this. your quote doesnt change reality. hmmm see how jay has loose skin in the lat spread but not showing the christmas tree. gasp same as dorian. but you'd like us to beleive that what dorian had was totally different hahah. dorian was conditioned, he did have great condition. but your quotes arent adressing his lower back in the lat spread. agian meaningless. even if they were im wouldnt agree because i also have things called eyes like the other person and can see loose skin. unless he is a dermatologist who can explain why that is not loose skin, you can shove the quote up your ass.





No no now you're back peddling when you first started posting you specifically stated Ronnie 2003 had better conditioned than Dorian and then after taking a beating you amended to he's more conditioned in parts  ::)

Quote
wrinkles are the same thing as loose skin you giant moron. whats the difference. yes dorian had fat on his lower back in the lat spread. the pic shows this. your quote doesnt change reality. hmmm see how jay has loose skin in the lat spread but not showing the christmas tree. gasp same as dorian. but you'd like us to beleive that what dorian had was totally different hahah. dorian was conditioned, he did have great condition. but your quotes arent adressing his lower back in the lat spread. agian meaningless. even if they were im wouldnt agree because i also have things called eyes like the other person and can see loose skin. unless he is a dermatologist who can explain why that is not loose skin, you can shove the quote up your ass.

meltdown  ;)

Jay isn't Dorian , his conditioning was never on par with Yates , stupid analogy and worse ' evidence ' lol

Quote
wrinkles are the same thing as loose skin you giant moron

So according to YOU the wrinkles on Dorian's triceps are loose skin lol so he's holding water and sq fat in his triceps and lower back now lol thank you  ;)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25237 on: February 25, 2007, 07:13:12 AM »
or a shot where his arms or quads are this conditioned.

you see, even 2003 Ronnie was harder than dorian in a lot of major areas:

 this being the case, a much harder 1999 or 1998 or 2001 Ronnie would simply make him look smooth and doughy, except for the lower back and abs...
 

Flower Boy Ran Away

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25238 on: February 25, 2007, 07:13:38 AM »
WRINKLES AND LOOSE SKIN ARE THE SAME THING, THIS JUST IN. dorians tris had wrinkles, aka loose skin according to the pictures. i dont know how to same it any clearer. your the one making the incredible claim that what everyone is seeing is not actually there, some provide the extraordinary evidence carl sagan.

are you suggesting that the folds of skin on his back, or on his tris arent actually there. and if so, that the camera is creating this illusion.

haha im saying that his pecs, delts, arms, glutes and hams, quads are more conditioned. you can have back, calves and abs. ronnie wins ahdhhahahaudshhauhduahha auhfuhdfuhha.


ya dorian has a different type of skin then jay, dorians folds are perfectly conditioned while cutlers are a flaw ahahaha.. were do you get this shit. your the most biased person ive ever argued with, you think dorian was perfection which is far from the truth. ronnie isnt either, but im not arguing that his ab and thigh is better because his THIGHS are better. this is the arguments you make. that dorians forarms are better so his arms are. or that calves are as important as arms lol.

your arguing against reality, and you've lost every argument we've had because your blinded by passionate love for dorian.

because you say dorian is conditioned doesnt make it so, the pics show loose skin.


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25239 on: February 25, 2007, 07:14:32 AM »
1999 vs 2003 Screencap quad comparison.

as you can see, ronnie was noticably harder in 1999:

Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83339
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25240 on: February 25, 2007, 07:15:43 AM »
WRINKLES AND LOOSE SKIN ARE THE SAME THING, THIS JUST IN. dorians tris had wrinkles, aka loose skin according to the pictures. i dont know how to same it any clearer. your the one making the incredible claim that what everyone is seeing is not actually there, some provide the extraordinary evidence carl sagan.

are you suggesting that the folds of skin on his back, or on his tris arent actually there. and if so, that the camera is creating this illusion.

haha im saying that his pecs, delts, arms, glutes and hams, quads are more conditioned. you can have back, calves and abs. ronnie wins ahdhhahahaudshhauhduahha auhfuhdfuhha.


ya dorian has a different type of skin then jay, dorians folds are perfectly conditioned while cutlers are a flaw ahahaha.. were do you get this shit. your the most biased person ive ever argued with, you think dorian was perfection which is far from the truth. ronnie isnt either, but im not arguing that his ab and thigh is better because his THIGHS are better. this is the arguments you make. that dorians forarms are better so his arms are. or that calves are as important as arms lol.

your arguing against reality, and you've lost every argument we've had because your blinded by passionate love for dorian.

because you say dorian is conditioned doesnt make it so, the pics show loose skin.



No , no you're stating that not only does he have loose skin , fat , water in his lower back he also has it on his triceps as well lol thats all I wanted to know lol

I'll let your statement stand as it is lol

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25241 on: February 25, 2007, 07:17:20 AM »
Quote
your arguing against reality, and you've lost every argument we've had because your blinded by passionate love for dorian.

very true.

ND pays no attention to reality.

only what he read in a book :-\

wrong sport to be doing that... :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83339
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25242 on: February 25, 2007, 07:18:18 AM »
very true.

ND pays no attention to reality.

only what he read in a book :-\

wrong sport to be doing that... :-\

meldtdown a trend on this Sunday morning among Coleman fans lol

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25243 on: February 25, 2007, 07:22:08 AM »
reality is tough, isn't it?
Flower Boy Ran Away

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25244 on: February 25, 2007, 07:28:30 AM »
reality is tough, isn't it?
hahahahahaahahah ND is blind
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25245 on: February 25, 2007, 07:29:44 AM »
hahahahahaahahah ND is blind

very true.

everyone is saying that but he just has no fucking clue :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25246 on: February 25, 2007, 07:32:37 AM »
very true.

everyone is saying that but he just has no fucking clue :-\
hulkster this pic is for you my friend

ND:you don't need to comment on this cuz you're blind :-\
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25247 on: February 25, 2007, 07:35:07 AM »
First of all Ronnie isn't two inches taller than Dorian and second Ronnie 2003 may have dwarfed Cutler and Dexter Jackson he would not make a 269 pound Dorian look small not by a long shot and Dorian never looked this full on-stage? what you meant to say if Dorian never looked that soft on-stage , Dorian at that weight is much harder than Ronnie at similar weight , he also crushes Ronnie in terms of density , balance & proportion

Dorian made Ray looks small because Ray weighed 55 pounds less and he was 4 inches shorter in that comparison Dorian is one inch shorter and is only outweighed by 18 pounds and thats not 18 bone dry , rock hard pounds either , well so much for your fantasy of Ronnie making Dorian look small  ;)

Why would you quote me but delete the Ronnie pic? lol, it seems if you were at all confident of your point you would not do this?!

Anyway, observe how he appears a good deal bigger, even if it's technically 'only' 18 pounds, perhaps partly due to a smaller waist. You are correct to assert that Dorian was harder onstage than 3 weeks prior, but it is plain for all to see that he was also never as full as those pics either, so to state one is not to negate the other.

I don't know why I didn't write ass and hams like I was thinking, I must be dislexic, but these are clearly superior to Dorian's anyway, although Dorians are very good. I have included the awe-inspiring Ronnie pic in question just in case you were succeeding in banishing the image from your mind in order to continue believing your argument is right.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25248 on: February 25, 2007, 07:37:46 AM »
No , no you're stating that not only does he have loose skin , fat , water in his lower back he also has it on his triceps as well lol thats all I wanted to know lol

I'll let your statement stand as it is lol

translation:ive admitted that he has wrinkles but was to stupid to realize that wrinkles are loose skin, now my best tactic is to avoid the questions and pictures like the plauge and inflate others comments so they look ridiculous.

im saying he had loose skin on his lower back, you've also said this. if there are wrinkles on his tris, youve also admitted they are then it is loose skin. plain and simple. theres nothing to argue the pics show the reality of the situation.

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #25249 on: February 25, 2007, 07:40:13 AM »
ronnie got legs..yates does'nt
RATM RULZ THE WORLD