oh god your a moron. you said wrinkles, which are loose skin. but yet your avoiding it like the plauge. stop being so biased and admit you are wrong for once.my very first post says loose skin, then you ask if im saying its fat or water. to which i replied the above. either way this is just a deliberate ploy to get off topic. he had loose skin, end of story. hence he loses that pose for having loose skin. it is not a good thing to have loose skin in the lat spread.you also said he had wrinkles, and your now denying it. owned ahha. stop being such a whiny bitch and at least try to argue, or you could keep posting quotes hoping they change reality.
i never said he had water or fat, just loose skin. however, loose skin implies either water, fat or just loose skin like an old man. it doesnt neccesarily mean fat or water dummy.
Oh really.....if it was that clearcut why do you spend the majority of your life here defending Coleman Oh, and this latspread kills any version of Ronnie's. Ronnie's back looks like a giant blob of shit in those 2003 pictures. Here's hint, stay with 98 and 99 pictures
And you're not defending yates? What's your point? Sure, while you're at it, tell that to the millions of people who thinks 03 Coleman is unbeatable. Question for ya. What's with all of the loose skin hanging on yates lower back? It doesn't mater. 98, 99 or 03 Coleman crushes yates.
Any year huh? lol Dorian has advantages in this pose that Ronnie doesn't like calves , density , balance & proportion , conditioning Read what Arnold says about the rear latspread when you flex the calf
Nope.
All of us are posting "CONTEST" pics and you post a "GYM PIC"? LOL, grow up. yates never looked like that on stage. In case you don't know, bodybuilding is judged on stage with a crowd. It is not judged in the gym with socks on.
No loose skin here. Plus Coleman is at a higher body weight than yates. This rear latspread kills any year of yates rear latspread.
LOL, please. You still haven't answered my question. What's with all of the loose skin?
03 Coleman was unbeatable compared to Cutler and Dexter Jackson lol Coleman 2003 dominated ho-hum competition wow I'm impressed , Coleman his huge and had good conditioning he also looked 14 months pregnant , his balance was also at its all-time worse , his conditioning wasn't on par with Dorians
Yeah, like I'm going to take your word. This is a guy who doesn't see loose skin hanging in this pic
Yates set the all-time standard for conditioning in 1995
Why are you posting pictures where Yates hasn't even hit the pose yet?
in all areas but the entire front side of his body....and the glutes and hams..
Kid get serious , keep fishing maybe you'll catch the big one , some day
i dont understand whats wrong with you. your losing this argument badly, and the yates side is obviously less intelligent. your only argument is no argument at all, silence. everyone can see he has a poor lower back in the lat spread compared to ronnie. a layer of loose skin which looks awful.
i love how nd posts a pose that isnt even remotely a mandatory. the back crunch pose as some people like to call it. yates had a great lower back. we know, his quads, arms, glutes, hams, delts and chest were less conditioned then ronnie.
Hell, even Nasser and Ray had better rear delts than Ronnie
I don't think so:ronnie wrote the book on delts
