Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Necrosis]

1) Conditioning & Definition - which I've explained to you is the same thing , yet you continue to treat each other as separate entities

2) No balance & proportion are NOT the same , and I proved my point countless times and have a six-time Mr Olympia specifically stating was my balance and proportion. just in case you missed it , learn the definition in terms of bodybuilding context

3) I have corrected all of you on your ignorant assertions many times , ( see above  ) I've always maintained the same things and have backed them up after the fact via eye witnesses , the same can't be said for you guys , I've always maintained that Dorian would beat Ronnie because most of the times he had the advantage in bulk , density , balance & proportion and conditioning and my story hasn't changed , you people have been grasping at every imaginable straw and angle for months now and in the end I'm right and you're wrong

again how can you present and argument when you don't even know what you're talking about , balance & proportion are the same  just like Ronnie is just as big in 01 as he was in 99 despite being 10 pounds lighter 

learn before you type and if not learn from what I type , either way learn 

dude your fucking dead wrong. your quotes say dorian was shredded from head to toe, balanced, and was huge.

but wait......... they have no fucking relevance to the discussion of ronnie vs dorian. he was ripped but compared to ronnie? no-pics show this

big...............NO-ronnie was more muscular

proportion....maybe

symmetry no way in hell hahaah this is laughable, with a torn bicep?  you dont know what symmetry is obviously.

your fucking quotes dont mean shit, pics can compare both at there peaks and ronnie wins, easily actually. please post madatories side by side of ronnie and dorian at there peaks and the evidence should speak for itself. no amount of quotes can change reality.

hope this helps

[Hulkster]

best arms of all time baby. crazy pics.

agreed. I think post tear dorian would have had to quit at 3 reps with the little one...

 

[pobrecito]

I think the dorian side has set an all time record for stupidity in the last few days.

first, the argument that 97 Dorian, who could barely beat 2004 Greg Kovacs, let alone a 98 or 99 Ronnie Fucking Coleman..

then,

the comment that ronnie "looks petite" in the screencaps, when he actually weighed 257 pounds (the same as dorian in 93) with much fuller and rounder muscle bellies...

and at the AC too, he looked MASSIVE:

 

Dumb as the day is long hahahahahahahahahaha

[Necrosis]

best arms and all, he still lost every time he faced Yates, and he lost to Cutler in 2001 and 2006.

Biceps mean damn near nothing in the outcome of a contest.

hahah ya cus his arms looked like the above pic. add better conditioning and about two inches.

never lost in 01. and 06 had to due with poor conditioning, nerve damage and arthritis in his shoulder leading to atrophy in the tri, and lats.

agian your post has no relevance and is a waste of space.

dorian vs ronnie(at there best) this is the topic.

so you present the arguments

dorian beat ronnie
- ronnie was not close to his best, no relevance

jay beat 01 ronnie
-no he never

jay beat 06 ronnie
-not even close to his prime, in fact the worst he has ever looked.


when you post keep the topic in mind, that way you can contribute posts that are worth reading.

pm me if you want help or clarification.

[pobrecito]

We all know damn well Coleman lost the 01 Olympia....I mean he lost the Muscularity and Symmetry rounds...what else is left?

The only reason he got the trophy was becuase he was backstage sucking a mad dick(s) hahahahahahahahahahahah

[pobrecito]

dorian beat ronnie
- ronnie was not close to his best, no relevance

In 96 and 97, Ronnie had the best arms in the IFBB. Didn't do a damn thing for him against Yates, even when they compared together. This is extremely relevant to your argument becuase you are claiming Coleman's arms would lead him to defeat Yates.

God damn you are a dumb f*ggot

Hope this helps.

[NeoSeminole]

1) Conditioning & Definition - which I've explained to you is the same thing , yet you continue to treat each other as separate entities

they are correlated with each other but are not the same. Conditioning means how dry and shredded a person is. Definition refers to separations and striations. You are a fool for thinking they mean the same thing.

2) No balance & proportion are NOT the same , and I proved my point countless times and have a six-time Mr Olympia specifically stating was my balance and proportion. just in case you missed it , learn the definition in terms of bodybuilding context

you have not proven anything. I don't give a shit if Dorian uses "balance" and "proportion" to mean different things. They are essentially the same.

3) I have corrected all of you on your ignorant assertions many times , ( see above ) ) I've always maintained the same things and have backed them up after the fact via eye witnesses , the same can't be said for you guys , I've always maintained that Dorian would beat Ronnie because most of the times he had the advantage in bulk , density , balance & proportion and conditioning and my story hasn't changed , you people have been grasping at every imaginable straw and angle for months now and in the end I'm right and you're wrong

utter bullshit, you pick and choose which quotes to use. I find it laughable that you would even cite that as evidence you have corrected us. For example, you like to quote Peter McGough in your argument that Ronnie was carrying more water in 99. However, you ignore when he says that Ronnie has the best back of all-time and is unbeatable. Then you claim that you "corrected" us with eye witness testimony yet pretend that you're somehow immune when we use quotes in our favor. Get real, kid.

[Necrosis]

In 96 and 97, Ronnie had the best arms in the IFBB. Didn't do a damn thing for him against Yates, even when they compared together. This is extremely relevant to your argument becuase you are claiming Coleman's arms would lead him to defeat Yates.

God damn you are a dumb f*ggot

Hope this helps.

HAHAH meltdown

your reading comprehension is as good as ND'S i see. haahahah

my quote was

"best arms of all time"

you took that as ronnie has the best arms so he would defeat a prime yates based solely on arms. ahhaha

"God damn you are a dumb f*ggot"

this quote should be posted in the dictionary with your picture under IRONY ahahahahah.

[Hulkster]

yes...how dumb...ronnie really did look petite...


 

[Necrosis]

ND likes to pic and choose quotes, and he beleives the quotes that favor him hold more water ahah.

he thinks pics are the worst way to judge a visual sport and that pics that dont directly compare prime yates vs coleman have authority and relevance some how.

this is a strange man we are arguing with. he seems to have thrown logic out the window and is biased beyond belief.

[pobrecito]

HAHAH meltdown

your reading comprehension is as good as ND'S i see. haahahah

my quote was

"best arms of all time"

you took that as ronnie has the best arms so he would defeat a prime yates based solely on arms. ahhaha

"God damn you are a dumb f*ggot"

this quote should be posted in the dictionary with your picture under IRONY ahahahahah.

You seem to think Ronnie's arms would help him....fact of the matter is, they didn't Not against Yates, not against Cutler, and not against Gunther

Hope this helps

[Iceman1981]

1997: an abomination

LOL. Don't forget this one:

[Hulkster]

LOL apparently dorian 1997 is more comparable to 2004 Kovacs than he is to 98/99 Ronnie Coleman..

yet still, the delusional nuthuggers insist he would still win...

what is it like to be so stupid?
 

[Hulkster]

ND likes to pic and choose quotes, and he beleives the quotes that favor him hold more water ahah.

he thinks pics are the worst way to judge a visual sport and that pics that dont directly compare prime yates vs coleman have authority and relevance some how.

this is a strange man we are arguing with. he seems to have thrown logic out the window and is biased beyond belief.

agreed.

ND believes that reading about contests is the best way to judge them...

real appropriate for a visual sport, isn't it?

[pobrecito]

Hulkster still in love with the most muscular hahahahahahaha

However, he chooses to forget the fact that Yates beats Coleman in the rear lat spread, front lat spread, rear double biceps, ab/thigh, and side tri LOL.

Lights out Ronnie

Hope this helps

[Hulkster]

Hulkster still in love with the most muscular hahahahahahaha

However, he chooses to forget the fact that Yates beats Coleman in the rear lat spread, front lat spread, rear double biceps, ab/thigh, and side tri LOL.

Lights out Ronnie

Hope this helps

tell us, o'resident troll, is that why you argued that Ronnie 99 was "the greatest ever" and would win 'everything except the ab shot and side tri'?

inquiring minds want to know:

[pobrecito]

Ronnie's back double bi sucks...Dorian kills him.

Here is proof:

[Hulkster]

Ronnie's back double bi sucks...Dorian kills him.

Here is proof:

lol whats really funny is there is ONE really good shot where dorian's back double bi actually looks really good.

the rest all look like this:




 
(check out the rolls of Cutler-fat above the tights..)
 

and yet there are dozens of shots showing Ronnie's double bi when in shape looking great.

what does that tell us?

that onstage, an in shape ronnie would easily beat Dorian in the back double bi...

[pobrecito]

The worst back double bi of any Mr. Olympia

[pobrecito]

lol whats really funny is there is ONE really good shot where dorian's back double bi actually looks really good.

Here is a little help for you.

The picture of Dorian illustrating the best back double bi of all-time that I used is from 1996 - near Dorian's most depleted and worst stage of his career.

What you have just posted is an offseason shot, a shitty upsized 94 shot (which ND has already refuted with higher quality scans), and a 97 shot.

Do you honestly think that the 96 Dorian back double bi picture is actually better than when he was at his best?

Until you grow up and quit posting the worst shots (including full offseason) of Dorian that you can find in comparison to Ronnie's best, I will sit here and match you post for post with 2001, 2002, 2004 and 2006 pictures illustrating Ronnie looking like utter garbage.

[Hulkster]

The worst back double bi of any Mr. Olympia

and the worst front double bi of any mr. olympia...

[Hulkster]

Do you honestly think that the 96 Dorian back double bi picture is actually better than when he was at his best?

unless you can prove otherwise, yes.

sometimes being depleted can make you even more detailed, as is the case with that dorian back shot.

for example, look at ronnie's quads and chest in his shitty depleated 2002 shape:

ripped to shreads:

[pobrecito]

unless you can prove otherwise, yes.

sometimes being depleted can make you even more detailed, as is the case with that dorian back shot.

for example, look at ronnie's quads and chest in his shitty depleated 2002 shape:

ripped to shreads:

Utter garbage and simply another excuse from Hulkster.

In fact, this is proof that deep down Hulkster knows just how mind-boggling that 96 back double bi is, and has to come up with this bullshit excuses in fear of admitting the scary fact that Yates at his best (93,95) was even better than that 96 shot

Oh, and here is a 95 shot besting any of Ronnie's

[Hulkster]

LOL how can that 96 shot be mind boggling with those stubby, shitty arms?

[NeoSeminole]

LOL how can that 96 shot be mind boggling with those stubby, shitty arms?

not only that, but Dorian's entire lower body looks smooth as hell.