Again the criteria favor's MY point of view not yours , so lets see you claim Dorian's back double biceps sucks because
NO biceps - and you have the balls to type blanket statement? Dorian at his best has good biceps certainly not the best but not poor , to claim otherwise isn't honest
Smaller arms - Smaller than Ronnie's yes , in proportion & balance with the rest of his physique yes , and the audacity of you to say anything about Dorian smaller arms yet ignore Ronnie's smaller calves which are NOT in proportion or balance with his physique , you have much to learn
Less Ripped Glutes & hams - give me a fucking break seriously you're reduced to arguing over who has more lines in their ass? lol pathetic comes to mind and Dorian has comparable separation in his hams
Less taper - another dumb tactic another straw to cling onto
Less thickness - retard statement of the week , Dorian Yates is the yardstick in which muscle thickness is measured by , his muscles have a thickness and a density rarely seen in his day or even today and its the result of his training style which not many people follow
Dorian does have faults but many more strengths to compensate , and he meets the criteria better than Ronnie , better balance & proportion , better density , depending on the year size and conditioning , this shot is textbook and outstanding and this isn't even his best year !!
everything you said was wrong. ahaha. your so biased you ignore reality.
retard statement of the week , Dorian Yates is the yardstick in which muscle thickness is measured by , his muscles have a thickness and a density rarely seen in his day or even today and its the result of his training style which not many people follow" how so when ronnies appear thicker? your a moron, your over zealous flex article mindset has got you brainwashed. they fucking talk about everyone like they are the next big thing, they use hyperbolic statements, and you my friend are a moron for repeating that utter bullshit.
taper is a huge part of back moron, the new mandate is based on taper, and X-FRAME haha. what did they just make it up last year. it was a statement to go back to HOW bodybuilding should be judeged and wasnt.
i'll adress your points when i have some time, but dude this is the ultimate blanket statement "
your right about the hams and glutes, ya who cares who is more conditioned. those parts dont matter, neither does biceps, or triceps. why even argue who has better conditioning in those parts it doesnt matter, all you need is a good calf and a dry back and the pose is yours. ahhaha. you truly dont have a clue about the criteria, you warp and bend the criteria to fit your ideal.
from your pic it is obvious that dorian is not thicker then ronnie, everything save calves is poorer. and ronnie has better taper with a smaller waist and close to equal detail. could you point out his non-exsistent biceps for me?
also why do you keep referring to ronnie like he is out of proportion. his arms, delts, back, hams, glutes are in perfect balance. his calves do not look out of balance in the arnold shots. ahah if anything dorians calves are too big, they are literally the size of this quads.
dorian loses that pose soundly. his only advantage is a little(youd be ignorant to say he is way more detailed) more detail and calves. you ignore ronnies taper, thickness, small waist, way better arms, shredded hams and glutes. if calves are an advantage then so are glutes, whith ronnie sporting the best ham-glute tie in in the buisness, read about it.
