everything you said was wrong. ahaha. your so biased you ignore reality.
retard statement of the week , Dorian Yates is the yardstick in which muscle thickness is measured by , his muscles have a thickness and a density rarely seen in his day or even today and its the result of his training style which not many people follow" how so when ronnies appear thicker? your a moron, your over zealous flex article mindset has got you brainwashed. they fucking talk about everyone like they are the next big thing, they use hyperbolic statements, and you my friend are a moron for repeating that utter bullshit.
taper is a huge part of back moron, the new mandate is based on taper, and X-FRAME haha. what did they just make it up last year. it was a statement to go back to HOW bodybuilding should be judeged and wasnt.
i'll adress your points when i have some time, but dude this is the ultimate blanket statement "
your right about the hams and glutes, ya who cares who is more conditioned. those parts dont matter, neither does biceps, or triceps. why even argue who has better conditioning in those parts it doesnt matter, all you need is a good calf and a dry back and the pose is yours. ahhaha. you truly dont have a clue about the criteria, you warp and bend the criteria to fit your ideal.
from your pic it is obvious that dorian is not thicker then ronnie, everything save calves is poorer. and ronnie has better taper with a smaller waist and close to equal detail. could you point out his non-exsistent biceps for me?
also why do you keep referring to ronnie like he is out of proportion. his arms, delts, back, hams, glutes are in perfect balance. his calves do not look out of balance in the arnold shots. ahah if anything dorians calves are too big, they are literally the size of this quads.
dorian loses that pose soundly. his only advantage is a little(youd be ignorant to say he is way more detailed) more detail and calves. you ignore ronnies taper, thickness, small waist, way better arms, shredded hams and glutes. if calves are an advantage then so are glutes, whith ronnie sporting the best ham-glute tie in in the buisness, read about it.
everything you said was wrong. ahaha. your so biased you ignore reality.
retard statement of the week , Dorian Yates is the yardstick in which muscle thickness is measured by , his muscles have a thickness and a density rarely seen in his day or even today and its the result of his training style which not many people follow" how so when ronnies appear thicker? your a moron, your over zealous flex article mindset has got you brainwashed. they fucking talk about everyone like they are the next big thing, they use hyperbolic statements, and you my friend are a moron for repeating that utter bullshit.
You're ignorant and have proven yourself so on many occasions , definition round ring a bell? and absolutely Yates in the Gold Standard for conditioned thickness & density and this statement above has zero content and all filler
taper is a huge part of back moron, the new mandate is based on taper, and X-FRAME haha. what did they just make it up last year. it was a statement to go back to HOW bodybuilding should be judeged and wasnt.
i'll adress your points when i have some time, but dude this is the ultimate blanket statement "
Oh Dorian has a nice V-taper and you people are grasping at straws thinking because Ronnie has a ' better taper ' that he's invincible
having a better taper means dick in reality , Dorian never had the best taper yet constantly defeated everyone who did , its an imaginary advantage that carries no weight like who has more ass-striations its straws , and again learn the criteria NO WHERE does it say X-frame thats another imaginary criteria , and the new mandate calls for a ' dramatic taper ' ( Yates has a dramatic taper at his best ) it also calls for balance between the upper & lower body , it also calls for balance & proportion throughout the physique another clear advantage for Dorian , it also calls for a flat ,
muscular abdomen , since you're fond of Ronnie 2003 while neither man has a totally flat abdomen , Dorian's is a hell of a lot more flat than Ronnie 2003 and Dorian's is more
muscular again the criteria YOU think favor's Ronnie actually favor's Dorian and the new mandate mentions aesthetics , something Dorian never had and Ronnie 2003 is the is as unaesthetic as he ever was so thats a moot advantage for either
your right about the hams and glutes, ya who cares who is more conditioned. those parts dont matter, neither does biceps, or triceps. why even argue who has better conditioning in those parts it doesnt matter, all you need is a good calf and a dry back and the pose is yours. ahhaha. you truly dont have a clue about the criteria, you warp and bend the criteria to fit your ideal.
Nonsense Dorian has striated glutes and so does Ronnie having more visible lines do NOT mean you're better conditioned thats a retard statement and Ronnie 2003 was huge & full also soft and holding water , especially compared to 2001 , and you're delusional and ignorant as to what conditioning is , more striations don't mean better conditioning , its the hardness and dryness of the muscles , how thin the skin in , how little fat and water one carries and Dorian is noted by his freaky conditioning and size , Ronnie 2003 broke no ground in the conditioning department , in fact his two best conditioned showings are among his lightest 1998/2001 NOT 2003 , again learn before you type
from your pic it is obvious that dorian is not thicker then ronnie, everything save calves is poorer. and ronnie has better taper with a smaller waist and close to equal detail. could you point out his non-exsistent biceps for me?
He's not thicker? lol you're equating soft fullness for thickness and its NOT Dorian thickness is outstanding from head to toe and the best part is , it's conditioned thickness he's NOT holding any water like Coleman , and again typical Coleman-groupie move , judging Dorian by using Ronnie as the template , Dorian doesn't need Ronnie's bigger biceps , or his smaller waist and better taper , thats what YOU think wins contests and it's not , Dorian's advantages in this pose , balance & proportion , thickness & detail , density and bulk ( depending on the year ) , and he's complete from head to toe , it's a text-book back double biceps shot thats not lacking in any aspect like Ronnie calves anyone? balance & proportion anyone? the thing with you people is you will never escape the criteria and it favor's Dorian
also why do you keep referring to ronnie like he is out of proportion. his arms, delts, back, hams, glutes are in perfect balance. his calves do not look out of balance in the arnold shots. ahah if anything dorians calves are too big, they are literally the size of this quads.
Perfect proportion MORONIC statement of the week ( again ) followed up by another Dorian's calves being ' too big " this isn't worthy of a response lol this statement among your other shows your ignorance
dorian loses that pose soundly. his only advantage is a little(youd be ignorant to say he is way more detailed) more detail and calves. you ignore ronnies taper, thickness, small waist, way better arms, shredded hams and glutes. if calves are an advantage then so are glutes, whith ronnie sporting the best ham-glute tie in in the buisness, read about it.
Dorian loses NO pose " soundly " to anyone in fact lol straight firsts in every single pre-judging from all of his Mr Olympia wins , you keep picking what YOU THINK the judges are looking for and I will correct you with what they are really looking for , balance & proportion ( Yates ) density ( Yates ) conditioning ( Yates ) size ( Yates depending on the year ) posing ( Yates ) this is what wins contests NOT x-frame and overdeveloped striated asses , Ronnie may have dominated ho-hum competition but NO ONE dominated Dorian at his best
pick a year
1998 - Dorian has the edge in balance & proportion , density , size and conditioning may be a push ( may be )
1999 - Dorian has the edge in balance & proportion , density , size and conditioning
2001 - Dorian has the edge in balance & proportion , density , size and conditioning may be a push
2003 - Dorian has the edge in balance & proportion , density , and conditioning
Dorian has to many advantages at his best compared to Ronnie every year , the criteria favor's Yates NOT Ronnie you guys cannot counter this , learn this , accept this and bow down to the superior bodybuilder Dorian Yates
