Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

Oh yeah, an IFBB judge has already gone on record as saying that Dorian had the best legs at the 1994 Olympia.

Hulkster owned yet again hahahahah

[Hulkster]

Dorian's thigh looks excellent here. I can clearly see all four muscles of the quad. Are you blind?

nice quad shot...

you are a complete idiot.

[Hulkster]

Oh yeah, an IFBB judge has already gone on record as saying that Dorian had the best legs at the 1994 Olympia.

Hulkster owned yet again hahahahah

yet more proof of what a sham the judging was at that contest.

have you SEEN dorian's BLOBS for legs in 94?

yeah, best legs:

I suppose you are going to tell me that dorian had better quads than the 11th place competitor despite this shot:

love to hear your explanation for this one...

[pobrecito]

Dorian's legs here are the most perfectly balanced, sized, and condition of all the competitors.

It's actually crystal clear why Dorian was named as having the best legs: Becuase he did

[Hulkster]

 

[pobrecito]

Perfect legs, top to bottom:

[pobrecito]

NeoSemen thinks these calves are better than Dorian's LOL.

[pobrecito]

Semenole seems to think that those two weird implant lines above the gastrocnemius mean that Ronnie's calves were detailed. LOL.

Seriously, there is absolutely no way that Ronnie's calves are not messed with, the muscle simply does not look like that naturally.

Find me a single other human with a calf muscle looking like that

[NeoSeminole]

Sir NeoSeminole thinks these calves are better than Dorian's LOL.

I dare you to show me where I said Ronnie's calves are better than Dorian's.

[Hulkster]

Find me a single other human with a calf muscle looking like that

what is your point?

find me a single other human being with arms like this and then we will talk:




ronnie's calves have looked smoothish since 1992. Are you claiming out of the blue that Ronnie was injecting them or had implants way back then?

how do you explain their gradual increase in size as ronnie got heavier?

 

[NeoSeminole]

Sir NeoSeminole seems to think that those two weird implant lines above the gastrocnemius mean that Ronnie's calves were detailed. LOL.

Seriously, there is absolutely no way that Ronnie's calves are not messed with, the muscle simply does not look like that naturally.

consider yourself owned, bitch.

[pobrecito]

LOL

[pobrecito]

According to NeoSemen...these have no detail as well

[Necrosis]

Do you think ND magically made this up?

No, he took the word of many people who witnessed Dorian live and made this claim.

You are not the one to refute this claim as you have never seen Dorian live.

dude, im not trying to refute it. both you guys are having trouble reading it. many might have said you have to see him in person. melvin said it too my face about ronnie. but the point im making is it wouldnt be only dorian who appears more impressive in person.

i will refute the point that he improves somehow. by that i mean, gets bigger, changes shape etc.....

that my friend does not happen.

[Necrosis]

Perfect legs, top to bottom:

dude those are not very good quads. what is good about them again compared to ronnie?

size-nope
sweep and shape-nope
seperation-nope
cuts-nope


please tell me how they are "perfect" quads.

[NeoSeminole]

dude those are not very good quads. what is good about them again compared to ronnie?

size-nope
sweep and shape-nope
seperation-nope
cuts-nope

please tell me how they are "perfect" quads.

b/c the Dorian nuthuggers believe that only criteria which favor Dorian should count more than criteria which favor Ronnie. Somehow balance outweighs muscular bulk, definition, and shape. And they claim they're not biased.

[IceCold]

b/c the Dorian nuthuggers believe that only criteria which favor Dorian should count more than criteria which favor Ronnie. Somehow balance outweighs muscular bulk, definition, and shape. And they claim they're not biased.

your missing the point.

for the 1000th time.

every advantage you say coleman has:  arms, taper, details, striations, etc. he had when he competed against dorian for 7 years.

it didnt matter.

where did he place?

it was only when his conditioning and fullness improved  (i'm refering to pre 03) that he was competitve.

so, it only makes sense to factor in that- ronnie's increase in conditioning and fullness.

the traits that coleman had also caused him to loose against dorian, so why would you or anyone think that all of a sudden they matter??

[NeoSeminole]

your missing the point.

every advantage you say coleman has:  arms, taper, details, striations, etc. he had when he competed against dorian for 7 years.

it didnt matter.

where did he place

it was only when his conditioning and fullness improved  (i'm refering to pre 03) that he was competitve.

no, you're missing the point. Comparing a neophyte Ronnie to what he would later become is ignorant on your part. It's like saying Dorian's conditioning, balance, density, and definition don't matter b/c he had all those when he lost against Momo. It was only after he added more size that he won.

[IceCold]

no, you're missing the point. Comparing a neophyte Ronnie to what he would later become is ignorant on your part. It's like saying Dorian's conditioning, balance, density, and definition don't matter b/c he had all those when he lost against Momo. It was only after he added more size that he won.

not necessarily.

i'm not refering to the coleman who finished dead last in the Olympia in 92, but the ronnie who in 95 won a pro show and was a top 5 finisher in every show he competed in.

big difference.

dorian didnt have that conditioning or density when he lost to momo. 

another difference.

ronnie DID have his arms, taper, details, etc. when he lost to dorian.

owned.

[pobrecito]

not necessarily.

i'm not refering to the coleman who finished dead last in the Olympia in 92, but the ronnie who in 95 won a pro show and was a top 5 finisher in every show he competed in.

big difference.

dorian didnt have that conditioning or density when he lost to momo. 

another difference.

ronnie DID have his arms, taper, details, etc. when he lost to dorian.

owned.

Great post !!

[Necrosis]

not necessarily.

i'm not refering to the coleman who finished dead last in the Olympia in 92, but the ronnie who in 95 won a pro show and was a top 5 finisher in every show he competed in.

big difference.

dorian didnt have that conditioning or density when he lost to momo. 

another difference.

ronnie DID have his arms, taper, details, etc. when he lost to dorian.

owned.

so using your logic everyone that ronnie has lost too, after 95 when he had those advantages, he should have kept losing too.

this is retarded. he beat shawn, flex, kevin, chris, etc etc, when he had lost to them before.


everything on ronnie got better. iwht increased size, and conditioning, he appearance improved drastically. this isnt hard to see. your comparing a pre peak ronnie with dorian and saying his improvment would not matter, an ignorant assumption.

[Hulkster]

so using your logic everyone that ronnie has lost too, after 95 when he had those advantages, he should have kept losing too.

this is retarded. he beat shawn, flex, kevin, chris, etc etc, when he had lost to them before.


everything on ronnie got better. iwht increased size, and conditioning, he appearance improved drastically. this isnt hard to see. your comparing a pre peak ronnie with dorian and saying his improvment would not matter, an ignorant assumption.

exactly.

according to that retarded logic, pretty much everyone would have beaten ronnie 99..since they all beat him a million times before when he apparently 'still had all the advantages over each competitor that 1999 Ronnie had.."

 

I am not sure which member of Camp Nuthugger is the most stupid...

between

Icecold's fake pics/footage fiasco

to

Icecold's retarded "peak ronnie was no different than pamper's Ronnie"

to

Pubic's insistance that Ronnie 2001 AC was only good because of the shitty competition (despite praising him in the past)

to

ND's "balance density size conditioning proportion" cliche that has absolutely NO validation anywhere except for the midsection and lower back...

Its really tough to tell who is the most stupid...


1 Dorian Yates England 
2 Nasser El Sonbaty Yugoslavia 
3 Shawn Ray USA 
4 Kevin Levrone USA 
5 Paul Dillett Canada 
6 Lee Priest Australia 
7 Jean-Pierre Fux Switzerland 
8 Chris Cormier USA 
9 Ronnie Coleman USA 
10 Milos Sarcev Yugoslavia 


According to IceCold, Priest and Fux would continue to Beat Ronnie in 98, 99 and all the years ahead...

[IceCold]

so using your logic everyone that ronnie has lost too, after 95 when he had those advantages, he should have kept losing too.

this is retarded. he beat shawn, flex, kevin, chris, etc etc, when he had lost to them before.


everything on ronnie got better. iwht increased size, and conditioning, he appearance improved drastically. this isnt hard to see. your comparing a pre peak ronnie with dorian and saying his improvment would not matter, an ignorant assumption.

not necessarily. 


for you to say that everyone who beat ronnie before would be him again is retarted.

those people arent dorian.  they never had dorian's combo of mass and conditioning.

my point was that all those advantages you claim ronnie had over dorian such as arms, taper, details, etc. DID NOT change in 98.

those traits were still better than dorian's just as they were in 92-97. 

yes, his fullness (not size because he pretty much weighed the same, pre 03) and conditioning did improve dramtically.

but would that be enough considering all those other things like ronnie's arms, taper, etc. didnt matter when he faced dorian. 

[pobrecito]

The 01ASC was a myth

Here is visual proof Hulkster:

[Hulkster]

and I suppose this is a myth too?