Pure bullshyt. Nice way of beating around the bush. I've brought up a point that you can't answer. So are you saying the rest of us is blind? Different poses causes the muscle to look different you moron, tight or loose/small or big. Coleman's tri looks a little small in the side tri, but his tris look big in the front and rear double bi. Different poses are different. I've noticed the past few weeks since we all see the loose skin hanging, you've been afraid to post a rear latspread. You're posting that crunch pose, LOL. It's not even a mandatory.
You still haven't answered my previous post. Circle what part of the back you're looking at:
No beating around the bush you're insane , he can't have ANY loose skin , water , fat etc that wouldn't be visible in other poses thats nonsense you don't know what you're talking about , and what the hell does Coleman's triceps have to do with anything ? we're not talking about size we're talking about , fat loose skin , water etc you know a condition that would obscure the sharpness of muscles
Again if Dorian had loose skin like you think it is it would still be loose in other poses it would obscure the sharpness of his lower lats and lower back especially in the crunch pose which it doesn't matter if its not a mandatory loose is the opposite of tight how the fuck can his entire lower lats and lower back be extremely tight if its loose ? it can't thats an oxymoron
the loose skin argument is the most pathetic devised this far it show cases how little people you know , you're claiming he has loose skin in his lower back and lower lats which is among his tightest IMPOSSIBLE ! entertaining your insane assessment that he did have loose skin it would still be loose in other back shots that showcase the muscularity of his lower lats and lower back and its not so therefore your wrong he can't be both razor sharp and shredded while carrying loose skin , fat and water .
look at all the pictures there is not one single ounce of water , loose skin , sub-q fat in the area of the lower latisimus and erector spinae to say otherwise is retarded the loose skin wouldn't become tight its an oxymoron the water wouldn't dry out , the fat wouldn't disappear it would be clearly evident in this pose more than any because it showcases the detail and sharpness and none of that would be visible if you were right , you're dead wrong period.
