Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Bear]

Actually it was Paul Dillett that Leroy Davis was mainly referring to. PWN3D LOL

Mmmm Leroy Davis.

[RocketSwitch625]

Mmmm Leroy Davis.

That's right. Leroy Davis is famous for being the only white man in the world to be called Leroy.

[The Enigma]

very true.

Haney was fantastic, but not in ronnie's league:

ZZZZZZZZZZ

[Hulkster]

ZZZZZZZZZZ

you sure have set the record for the most posts with the least amount of meaningful content..

[kyomu]

I saw best Haney in Osaka 1988 and he has just won one of his sandow.
And he trained at my gym. I was just a beginner less than one year!!

[Hulkster]

Ronnie and flex (1996?) vs. Haney and and Labrada (1990):

[Hulkster]

Ronnie back comparison, early career (probably 92) vs Peak form (studio shot from 2001 AC I think):

[The Enigma]

you sure have set the record for the most posts with the least amount of meaningful content..

Thank you Hulk, it's intended that way. 

[kyomu]

Ronnie back comparison, early career (probably 92) vs Peak form (studio shot from 2001 AC I think):

Great post!!

[Hulkster]

you can see from the back comparison shot how much more massive his arms (check the tris) and back/lats/width were.

yet he kept the detail almost the same, except for the inner deltoids.

awesome.

no one comes close to that combo in the back.

dorian and flex had the detail, neither had the thickness.

[Hulkster]

got pecs?

[RocketSwitch625]

Even in 1996 Coleman had a big sticky out ass. Just look at the size of those glutes compared to Wheeler's true bodybuilder's glutes. If there's one thing Hulkster loves about Coleman it's his big sticky out ass. I bet he has wet dreams about Coleman doing big eggy pumps in his face. It's a well known medical fact that steroids cause bad cases of flatulence.

[Hulkster]

Ronnie and Flex (1996) vs. Dorian and Kevin, 1994:

[forcedreps]

Haney looked awesome without the drugs from today but it's pointless to compare a guy on GH with someone like haney that had not the chance to max his potential like coleman did on GH.

Haney has won the Mr.O 8 times without the drugs from today 

I have seen both guys a few times on stage and coleman even backstage and I can  tell you haney is still the man with the best back in my book.

Sure coleman has awesome arms and legs and also a great back so therefore he is more complete but to claim haney would be a b tier olympian is stupid.

Both guys have/had flaws, coleman is far away from perfect.

Coleman has the best back in the world ? Sorry not in my book.

Best back double biceps pose yes cause of his biceps but best back NO.

Haney had a way better structure and much better back/chest, he was wider than coleman and that without GH so to call haney b tier is ridiculous.

Coleman has the advantage in biceps, lower back, legs but haney at his peak blows coleman away from the back and from the chest if it comes to thickness.


To compare a guy on GH with somone that hasn't used it is almost like you would compare a natural with someone on roids   Pointless.

Hell haneys back/chest was better than colemans and that almost 20 years ago so that should give you an idea how haney would have looked compared with him if he would have used todays drugs and would have played the mass game 

Haney is still unmatched if it comes to back and chest thickness, you would say the same if you would have seen haney onstage at his best.

So better biceps/legs for coleman yes but better back or chest no way....

Sure coleman would win over haney at his best no question but like I said haney is the man if it comes to chest and back.

Never forget haney peaked almost 20 years ago so please stop to compare them.

I want not even know how coleman would look and what he would be today without GH

BTW, Your haney pics show him at his worst showings (1989/90)

Here are a few better pics of haney if you still want compare him with coleman but like I said this comparison is pointless.

[forcedreps]

.....

[forcedreps]

And here a comparison just for fun 

See what I mean, it's pointless to compare a guy at his peak and the other guy at his worst showing

[forcedreps]

One more just for fun and I really hope you can see now how stupid it is to use bad pics to let bodybuilder a look better than bodybuilder b 

[pumpster]

Haney looked awesome without the drugs from today but it's pointless to compare a guy on GH with someone like haney that had not the chance to max his potential like coleman did on GH.

Haney has won the Mr.O 8 times without the drugs from today 

I have seen both guys a few times on stage and coleman even backstage and I can  tell you haney is still the man with the best back in my book.

Sure coleman has awesome arms and legs and also a great back so therefore he is more complete but to claim haney would be a b tier olympian is stupid.

Both guys have/had flaws, coleman is far away from perfect.

Coleman has the best back in the world ? Sorry not in my book.

Best back double biceps pose yes cause of his biceps but best back NO.

Haney had a way better structure and much better back/chest, he was wider than coleman and that without GH so to call haney b tier is ridiculous.

Coleman has the advantage in biceps, lower back, legs but haney at his peak blows coleman away from the back and from the chest if it comes to thickness.


To compare a guy on GH with somone that hasn't used it is almost like you would compare a natural with someone on roids   Pointless.

Hell haneys back/chest was better than colemans and that almost 20 years ago so that should give you an idea how haney would have looked compared with him if he would have used todays drugs and would have played the mass game 

Haney is still unmatched if it comes to back and chest thickness, you would say the same if you would have seen haney onstage at his best.

So better biceps/legs for coleman yes but better back or chest no way....

Sure coleman would win over haney at his best no question but like I said haney is the man if it comes to chest and back.

Never forget haney peaked almost 20 years ago so please stop to compare them.

I want not even know how coleman would look and what he would be today without GH

BTW, Your haney pics show him at his worst showings (1989/90)

Here are a few better pics of haney if you still want compare him with coleman but like I said this comparison is pointless.

It takes a tier-b mentality to pretend that both Haney & Yates weren't hugely flawed. Not the best Olympians in comparison with the best ever, no. Haney's torso, one-third of his physique, was the only greatness in him. That's a full two-thirds of the physique that didn't stack up. Had he had the size in those other areas he'd have been undeniably great.

As far as backs, Haney's back is one of the best, but to pretend that it's anything other than opinion at this level is sheer stupidity. In fact it's quite delusional to render anything more than a preference given the excellence of all three re: back.

Chest Haney had great muscle quality but to say it was better than Coleman's is again living in a dream world. The more objective assessor realizes that at this level it's merely a matter of personal preference as to whose was better.

On overall physique there's no comparison; Haney mightily unbalanced, overwhelmed by torso. Certain pics posted here don't show that, while others show it very overtly. Haney for example, is tied with Yates for worst all-time Olympian winner most muscular.

And to bring up the GH issues is LAME. In that case Haney can't be compared with anyone before him either. LOL absurd.

[pumpster]

Even in 1996 Coleman had a big sticky out ass.

Rocket's continued fascination with Coleman's  ass. Most BBs at heavier bodyweight ends up with more meat back there, including Yates. Enjoy.

[RocketSwitch625]

Although I feel that Haney was overall a better Mr Olympia than Coleman I can't believe how tiny his calves were.

[bmacsys]

This thread has been on the charts longer than Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon.

[forcedreps]

As far as backs, Haney's back is one of the best, but to pretend that it's anything other than opinion at this level is sheer stupidity

Says the man that hasn't seen haney onstage I guess 

I have seen both, coleman has a great back but for me haney is still #1 if it comes to back thickness and lat width.

On overall physique there's no comparison;

Haney mightily unbalanced, overwhelmed by torso. Certain pics posted here don't show that, while others show it very overtly

I wrote **Sure coleman would win over haney at his best no question but like I said haney is the man if it comes to chest and back**

Which part do you not understand ?

SURE COLEMAN WOULD WIN OVER HANEY     is it more clear now ? 

Haney for example, is tied with Yates for worst all-time Olympian winner most muscular.

That's just your opinion and I think you only say that cause for you the most muscular must show monster biceps so a bodybuilder without monster biceps is b tier for you.

Haney had a great MM, only his arms looked a bit small for his huge chest but to call haneys MM the worst in BB history cause he had no monster biceps is ridiculous.

Do you really think big arms are the most important thing in the MM pose ?

You also need a big chest and haney had a very good chest so to say he had one of the worst MM poses in BB history is retarded.

Newsflash, bertil fox had still the best most muscular back in 1983, coleman is in no way comparable with fox if it comes to the MM.

And to bring up the GH issues is LAME. In that case Haney can't be compared with anyone before him either. LOL absurd.

Why lame ?

Like I said you cannot compare a BB on GH with someone that has never used it.

Apples and oranges dude

Yeah why would you compare larry scott or arnold with haney    Pointless.

To compare haney and coleman is just stupid, I bet you have not even an idea how haney could have looked with GH so to bring GH up is only normal if people compare haney and coleman.

Would you compare a natural with a roid user ?  Pointless.

I can imagine what coleman would be today without GH, I don't try to degrade coleman, I just brought up the GH thing to show how stupid it is to compare a almost ironage BB with a bodybuilder from today


Your pic of haneys MM is shit old, you should only use pics of him at his peak or do you think this comparison is fair ?  I don't think so....

[Hulkster]

thanks to ForcedReps's awesome screencaps, we can now do stuff like this, Haney peak form vs Ronnie peak form:

 

[Hulkster]

more: this time, Chris is thrown into the mix:

[Hulkster]

Coleman 95 vs Coleman 2001 AC