Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3519130 times)

kyomu · « **Reply #27101 on:** April 10, 2007, 03:39:01 AM »

Quote from: Bear on April 10, 2007, 03:35:01 AM

'97

mmmm these pics are too rough to judge. But still Nasser looks better in them.

IceCold · « **Reply #27102 on:** April 10, 2007, 07:57:25 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on April 10, 2007, 02:54:29 AM

Speaking of delusional, he's just confirmed what i said. hahaahaahahaahah

explain.

your post, like your life and workouts, makes no sense.

i called you out about your last post and then you go ahead and post the same picture you've posted 100 times that has nothing to with any posts.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #27103 on:** April 10, 2007, 01:44:23 PM »

Look familiar? LOL

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #27104 on:** April 10, 2007, 01:56:07 PM »

Quote from: kyomu on April 10, 2007, 03:25:36 AM

Most of them are not taken in 1996.
Be careful, I am talking about 1996 version.

If you believe that synthol use has only been around for the last 4 or so years you are mistaken my friend. I can tell you that certain pro bodybuilders were using the "posing oil" as early as 1995.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27105 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:13:28 PM »

I didn't make comparisons in a while. Discuss

Hulkster · « **Reply #27106 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:19:34 PM »

99 Ronnie is destroying Dorian as usual.

hows that for discussion!

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27107 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:24:23 PM »

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27108 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:25:18 PM »

Both at their worst years

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27109 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:27:21 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on April 10, 2007, 02:20:28 PM

Hulkster, I'm calling for a Truce.

How about we both just agree that Ronnie is better than Dorian and end this thread?

You have my vote

IceCold · « **Reply #27110 on:** April 10, 2007, 03:36:52 PM »

i dont know if its the pic or not, but very similar arm size.

ronnie has better peak and bi's, but dorian is right there in terms of size.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27111 on:** April 10, 2007, 03:48:59 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on April 10, 2007, 03:36:52 PM

i dont know if its the pic or not, but very similar arm size.

ronnie has better peak and bi's, but dorian is right there in terms of size.

Ronnie looks sharper, drier and more seperated than yates. Plus Ronnie looks more aesthetic

pumpster · « **Reply #27112 on:** April 10, 2007, 04:03:23 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on April 10, 2007, 03:36:52 PM

i dont know if its the pic or not, but very similar arm size.

ronnie has better peak and bi's, but dorian is right there in terms of size.

If "icecold" had a clue and had followed the thread earlier he'd be bright enough to conclude that the pic's likely morphed - HUGE different in arm size in that one shot vs. any other, including those below.

No getting around Yates' arm deficiencies, my clueless little hostile one. LOL

Besides which those are some of the ugliest arms in history.

IceCold · « **Reply #27113 on:** April 10, 2007, 04:35:26 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on April 10, 2007, 04:03:23 PM

Besides which those are some of the ugliest arms in history.

[img][http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/yates/dy187.jpg/img]

any other valid points you wanted to make?

countdown to your excuses.........

Hulkster · « **Reply #27114 on:** April 10, 2007, 05:50:58 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on April 10, 2007, 03:36:52 PM

i dont know if its the pic or not, but very similar arm size.

ronnie has better peak and bi's, but dorian is right there in terms of size.

no he isn't.

even in 93, his arms would have been noticably smaller than a 1999 Ronnie's:

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27115 on:** April 10, 2007, 06:46:43 PM »

This is one of yates favourite pose and he is getting his ass handed to him here. Ronnie is more shredded, dry, seperated, harder, advantage on muscular bulk and looks more aesthetic. The only thing that looks good on yates are his inner thigh and calves.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #27116 on:** April 10, 2007, 07:53:24 PM »

Yates couldn't come close to this

pobrecito · « **Reply #27117 on:** April 10, 2007, 08:03:23 PM »

Look at you lame losers.....everybody gone and you are still posting in here....proof of no life. LOL

Countdown to Hulkster suicide now that he has no one to argue with anymore hahahahahahah

Sir Bigness · « **Reply #27118 on:** April 10, 2007, 08:27:04 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on April 10, 2007, 06:46:43 PM

This is one of yates favourite pose and he is getting his ass handed to him here. Ronnie is more shredded, dry, seperated, harder, advantage on muscular bulk and looks more aesthetic. The only thing that looks good on yates are his inner thigh and calves.

What is the lump on the side of Colemans ass? Scartissue buildup?

forcedreps · « **Reply #27119 on:** April 11, 2007, 02:06:36 AM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on April 10, 2007, 07:53:24 PM

Yates couldn't come close to this

You are the living proof that the coleman side has also a few very nasty nuthuggers LOL

Are you crazy ? do you really think coleman's back on the relentless pic you posted could beat yates back ?

Speaking of delusional

Coleman's back in 2006 could not beat any back of yates no matter which year

hell he could not even beat cutlers back 2006 and cutlers back blows

Coleman looks nasty 2006, please stop to act like he would still have looked halfway decent at the 2006 Mr.O or on his new DVD.

If you want worship coleman pick a year like 1998,1999,2000, even 2003 if you prefer mass over mass with class but please nothing from 2006 again

Since you love his 2006 version so much I'll post a nice comparison for you in a moment, I know you love comparisons

Yates 1995 vs Coleman 2006, hey after all you claimed yates couldn't come close to colemans missing back from 2006 so don't complain afterwards LOL

forcedreps · « **Reply #27120 on:** April 11, 2007, 02:11:34 AM »

Yates 1995 Pre-Judging.

forcedreps · « **Reply #27121 on:** April 11, 2007, 02:12:28 AM »

forcedreps · « **Reply #27122 on:** April 11, 2007, 02:13:22 AM »

forcedreps · « **Reply #27123 on:** April 11, 2007, 02:14:09 AM »

forcedreps · « **Reply #27124 on:** April 11, 2007, 02:16:11 AM »

Pre-Judging 2006 Coleman, you asked for them