Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[forcedreps]

Since I've already posted HQ pics for the coleman side I think it's only fair to post also a few HQ pics of yates to reanimate this lame topic again 

[forcedreps]

....

[forcedreps]

....

[forcedreps]

....

[bigkubby]

....

yates had some of the most diguisting amrs look at second pic i wanna throw up and ronnie smashes on him

[Hulkster]

goddamn does Ronnie's back kill dorian's.

 makes it looks smooth, thin and flat.

[pumpster]

yates had some of the most diguisting amrs look at second pic i wanna throw up and ronnie smashes on him

Pithy

[pumpster]

Since I've already posted HQ pics for the coleman side I think it's only fair to post also a few HQ pics of yates to reanimate this lame topic again 

According to this pompous ass it takes his input to "reanimate" hahahahahaha

[pumpster]

You are the living proof that the coleman side has also a few very nasty nuthuggers LOL

Are you crazy ?  do you really think coleman's back on the relentless pic you posted could beat yates back ?

Speaking of delusional   

Coleman's back in 2006 could not beat any back of yates no matter which year hell he could not even beat cutlers back 2006 and cutlers back blows

Forget 2006, or i'll have to bring up THIS, which was allowed to WIN 

[forcedreps]

goddamn does Ronnie's back kill dorian's.

 makes it looks smooth, thin and flat.

Flat of course, yates never had the full muscle look cause of his diet style but to claim he is smooth here compared to coleman in your comparison is a joke.

Yates is the clear winner if it comes to condition in your comparison, the rest (muscle bulk,muscle shape) and everything else goes to coleman but to claim yates looks smooth on this pic is retarded   it's almost the same like ND would claim yates biceps is something special, retarded if you ask me...

[forcedreps]

Forget 2006, or i'll have to bring up THIS, which was allowed to WIN 

Like I said yates should have only won 3 Mr.O titles (1992,93 and 95) imo so to link a pic of yates from 1994 is total pointless.

We all can see that yates looks like a loser in 1994 like coleman in 2006, hope this helps

[pumpster]

We all can see that yates looks like a loser in 1994 like coleman in 2006, hope this helps

Looks like a loser but allowed to win.

[IceCold]

Yates 1995 Pre-Judging.

thanks for the pics - great quality.

[IceCold]

Like I said yates should have only won 3 Mr.O titles (1992,93 and 95) imo so to link a pic of yates from 1994 is total pointless.

We all can see that yates looks like a loser in 1994 like coleman in 2006, hope this helps

coleman was worse in 06 than yates was in 04.

dorian was not out of shape, ronnie was. 

[Iceman1981]

You are the living proof that the coleman side has also a few very nasty nuthuggers LOL

Are you crazy ?  do you really think coleman's back on the relentless pic you posted could beat yates back ?

Speaking of delusional   

Coleman's back in 2006 could not beat any back of yates no matter which year hell he could not even beat cutlers back 2006 and cutlers back blows

Coleman looks nasty 2006, please stop to act like he would still have looked halfway decent at the 2006 Mr.O or on his new DVD.

If you want worship coleman pick a year like 1998,1999,2000, even 2003 if you prefer mass over mass with class but please nothing from 2006 again 

Since you love his 2006 version so much I'll post a nice comparison for you in a moment, I know you love comparisons 

Yates 1995 vs Coleman 2006, hey after all you claimed yates couldn't come close to colemans missing back from 2006 so don't complain afterwards LOL

I posted the real latspread gym pic because it looked great, what's wrong with that? That is one of his best shots of 2006. I was in no way comparing his 06' Olympia to any Olympia version of yates. I see nothing wrong with what I did. By the way, where did I ever say that I love his 2006 version? lol. That's his worst ever. So, you're the one comparing yates best to Ronnies worst, not me. By the way, thanks for the pics.

[IceCold]

at first, wasnt forced reps very anti - dorian?

[pobrecito]

at first, wasnt forced reps very anti - dorian?

No, he can see greatness when it is presented, unlike some others in this thread who hate for "other" reasons such as race, training style, personality, etc.

[pumpster]

No, he can see greatness when it is presented, unlike some others in this thread who hate for "other" reasons such as race, training style, personality, etc.

Sloppy attempted coverup.

[pobrecito]

You were at some of the Yates wins. What was it you said about him, something about him being underwhelming I think.

At 1994, I thought he was untochable and really great.

LOL.

[Hulkster]

Flat of course, yates never had the full muscle look cause of his diet style but to claim he is smooth here compared to coleman in your comparison is a joke.

Yates is the clear winner if it comes to condition in your comparison, the rest (muscle bulk,muscle shape) and everything else goes to coleman but to claim yates looks smooth on this pic is retarded   it's almost the same like ND would claim yates biceps is something special, retarded if you ask me...

clear winner when it comes to condition? If you look, dorian has actually far LESS deliniation between the muscles than dorian does.

just because his back is thinner and more flat than Ronnie's, which is more thick, does  NOT mean he automatically has better conditioning:

[Hulkster]

at first, wasnt forced reps very anti - dorian?

I don't think he was so much anti dorian as he was "its bloody obvious to anyone that 99 Ronnie is better overall"

thats why he made fun of (like we all did) the now famous "countdown to excuses line"

because it is exactly that:

ronnie (in 99 at least) was clearly better overall than the best that dorian ever presented.

to argue otherwise is to ignore normal judging conventions and come up with excuses...with or without the countdown...

[pumpster]

yates had some of the most diguisting amrs look at second pic i wanna throw up and ronnie smashes on him

[pumpster]

At 1994, I thought he was untochable and really great.But, at 1996,Nasser was huge like hell and Dorian was completely owned from the front.Dorian beat Nasser from back ONLY.

[IceCold]

to argue otherwise is to ignore normal judging conventions and come up with excuses...with or without the countdown...

are you refering to the normal judging conventions as the ifbb juding criteria that you refuse to accept that sucky has point out to you numerous times.

www.ifbb.com

[IceCold]

just because his back is thinner and more flat than Ronnie's, which is more thick, does  NOT mean he automatically has better conditioning:

just bc ronnie's torso is shorter and therfore gives the appearance of being thicker doesnt mean his conditioning is better.

short torso, hence the 4 pack.

perfect example of a short bber who looks extremely thick by themselves (priest, branch) then get dwarfed next to a taller bber.  (ie, when dorian domainted ronnie for 7 years).