I assure you that's the farthest thing from the truth. I actually caved in and read your post. As expected, it was filled with many errors and lies. I'll give a few quick examples. You claimed that 03 Ronnie's arms were no more than 2" bigger than Dorian's when Ronnie's arms were 23" in 97. It's safe to assume they were larger in 03. You also claim that Flex Wheeler had better taper than Ronnie. Several people including someone from your side proved you wrong. Mind you, these are just 2 examples off the top of my head. I could respond to your post, point by point, but it's not worth the effort it would take just so you could repeat the same bullshit again. 
Ronnie's arms were never 23" onstage, sport. If Ronnie's arms were 23" in 1997, then what were they in 2003? 25"?
You lied big time. You even lied when you claimed that you only read my posts that are directed at you, when in reality you quote posts of mine even from other threads. You lied even more whe I claimed that I said that Dorians graininess was better seen i perso due to a "photoelectric effect", whe i relaity I said nothing of the sort. As for the taper thing, Wheeler did have better taper than Ronnie in his best 1993 ASC and Ironmen shapes, so how exactly am I wrong? And please...I am not worth the effort
...funny that I took my time to explain to you in profound detail why you're wrong, and you still have the nerve to claim this. You are
wrong about your points. Get over it.
You completely avoid the major points of my posts and focus on irrelevant stuff like the rhomboids, or whether 21" is 52 cm or not. The reason why you avoid the issues is because you know you can't hang with me. I have defated you in this discussion, NeoSeminole. This became evident to me when I explaied to you in deep detail why you're wrong about genetics not playing a part in separations besides determining fat distribution, and you claimed that I didnt give any explanations, when the reverse is true - you didnt give any explanations, because you know you got
owned. I laughed whenI read you saying that I didnt give any explanations for my poits, when the reverse is true: you were unable to reply to my points, because you are unable to. I showed you exactly why youre wrong, and you keep in denial. Here are some o the retarded things youve said, that I've proved wrong:
- That Coleman carried more lean mass at the 2001 ASC than at the 1999 Olympia
- That the ASC Coleman carried more lean mass than Dorian at the 1995 Olympia.
- That the only role genetics play in separations is determiig it's distribution.
- That I lied about Dorian having 21" onstage when in reality I rounded the number up; if I lied about that, then I also lied about Coleman having 23" onstage.
Now, you using the excuse that you wont reply to my posts because they are full of errors is pathetic, because I could use the same reason for stopping to reply to your posts. The difference between me and you is that I go over in detail and explain your errors, while you don't do that for my supposed errors. I had a great time in this thread owning Hulkster. No, not you, because you're too easy.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
