Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3499101 times)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28150 on: May 14, 2007, 07:53:55 PM »
Both have great side tris - much better than Coleman - hell, even Badell beat Coleman on side tri LOL

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28151 on: May 14, 2007, 07:59:58 PM »
After this week's NY Pro, i see some very, very disturbing similarities:

-Same cut tris and overall "grainy" look. ::)

Thanks for walking into yet another door. :D


not quite.

branch isnt at that level yet.

by the way he did win the show.  (even though wolf should have won). 

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28152 on: May 14, 2007, 08:32:49 PM »
Branch looks huge  :o

It's good to see today's generation of bodybuilders chasing the standard Dorian set when he first took the Olympia title in 92.
TEAM REPTILIAN

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28153 on: May 14, 2007, 08:46:35 PM »
Ya his traps are "tiny".  ::) ::)

BTW did i mention you're an idiot?

 

Hope this helps

"Tiny" is a relative term? Did I call them tiny? I would call them small, but only next to Yates:




hahaha proof is in the pictures!
Ronnie could never remedy this glaring size disparity because of his genetics...
The same genetic hand that cursed him with puny calves and downright weird looking abdominal muscles.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Good pics Pabro.
TEAM REPTILIAN

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28154 on: May 14, 2007, 09:02:02 PM »
"Tiny" is a relative term? Did I call them tiny? I would call them small, but only next to Yates:






Dude i have bad news you've lost some of your sight-Coleman's traps are noticably larger than Yates in your shots, the only issue in the first shot's the angle..you're scary. :o

Yates can't come close to this.

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28155 on: May 14, 2007, 09:10:42 PM »
Yes, because a slight difference in camera angles accounts for Yates' traps being TWICE AS BIG!

You're off your rocker.
TEAM REPTILIAN

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28156 on: May 14, 2007, 09:13:11 PM »
you mean your self-proclaimed 'ownings?' ha ha ha ha.

  Actually, several people pointed that out. ;)

Quote
I didn't agree with you. I never said that Dorian wins the side triceps b/c his lateral head looks better. I said he wins this pose b/c he presents an overall better package. So don't misconstrue my words to mean I agree with you.

  You said that Ronnie has better pectoralis, biceps and triceps than Dorian, and I said that it doesen't matter, because Dorian makes his supposedly "inferior" bodyparts work for him when it counts. So by saying that Dorian wins the side triceps becuase he has a better overral package, you indirectly agreed with me.

Quote
Ronnie still wins the front double biceps, front lat spread, side chest, and most muscular due to his superior pecs, delts, biceps and triceps.

  How can Ronnie win the front lat pread with lat that don't flare a much? ::) And most muscular? It wasn't a mandatory during Dorian's reign, so it' not fair to judge Dorian for something that wasn't relevant when he was competing.

Quote
you should care if someone from your own side says you're wrong. ;)

  Who said that he's on my side? I am on my own side and no one else's.

Quote
don't be a hypocrite. You referenced the hearsay of others to support your opinion. I can do the same.

  This coming from you, who posted a gazillion quotes from others saying that Ronnie is better.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28157 on: May 14, 2007, 09:20:13 PM »
Yes, because a slight difference in camera angles accounts for Yates' traps being TWICE AS BIG!

You're off your rocker.

LOL

Conclusive proof that Yates annihilates Ronnie from the rear:

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28158 on: May 14, 2007, 09:21:41 PM »
LOL

Conclusive proof that Yates annihilates Ronnie from the rear:
Precisely. ::)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28159 on: May 14, 2007, 09:22:04 PM »
you are such a pathetic liar. The only reason you choose Dorian is b/c to not pick him is to admit that he carried body fat and water. I dare you to ask 10 people that don't follow bodybuilding who looks harder and more shredded in these pics. My bet is they will all pick Ronnie.

  If you admit that Ronnie carried more fat and water overral, then we can talk... ;)

Quote
 that's where you're wrong. If Dorian was 3% body fat sans water, then 01 ASC Ronnie was 2% body fat sans water. Now matter how low Dorian was, Ronnie still had better conditioning that day and it showed.

  Delusional. Your attempts to prove that bodyfat and water are the only factors in separations are becoming boring. Dorian wa a low in bodyfat and water as is Humanly possile and yet he was far less separated than Ronnie overral. Give up. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28160 on: May 14, 2007, 09:23:14 PM »


Look at all that water retention in Ronnie.

hahahaha. Ronnie Coleman is just "Waterlogged Mass" haha
TEAM REPTILIAN

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28161 on: May 14, 2007, 09:24:38 PM »
Precisely. ::)


why do you keep posting a shot of ronnie when he got 6th place against dorian?

ronnie couldnt even beat a 200 lbs. shawn ray in 96. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28162 on: May 14, 2007, 09:26:41 PM »
Precisely. ::)

Wait a minute, you post a blurry ass screenshot where Yates is angled off to the side and then you bitch about this? Oh, and by the way, Yates is killing Ronnie in that comparison. Here is the proof, same contest:


pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28163 on: May 14, 2007, 09:29:03 PM »
Scary parallels.. :o

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28164 on: May 14, 2007, 09:30:17 PM »
Scary parallels.. :o

Notice that biceps don't make up for a narrow, soggy back LOL


pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28165 on: May 14, 2007, 09:30:28 PM »
More similarities! More "graininess"   :-\

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28166 on: May 14, 2007, 09:31:19 PM »


Branch looks amazing in that shot. Not since Yates or Jurrasic Park have we seen calves like that.

Look at the feathering in those teardrops!  :o
TEAM REPTILIAN

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28167 on: May 14, 2007, 09:45:11 PM »
Height plays an important role in determining muscular separations and striations between 2 individuals if body fat is equal. One guy could be 5'8" while the other is 7' tall, and both have 200 lbs of lean mass. The shorter person will display more definition than the taller individual. Don't forget that body fat is expressed as a percentage of total body weight. Just b/c they both have the same % doesn't mean they have the same non-lean mass. The 7' guy carries extra weight in his bones, connective tissue, organs, etc. So even though they may both be 3% body fat, the taller person is carrying more lbs of fat.

    This happens because the taller guy will have less subcutaneous fat, not because he is taller. If the % of bodyfat to mucle mass is the same between the two, then stature is irrelevant. The weight of bones and organs does not affect separations, so it was not necessary to bring it up. Fat to mucle ratio is a factor in separations, stature to muscle is not. So, no, they don't need to have neither the same lean muscle mass or stature to be roughly as separated, as long as their % of bodyfat to muscle is the same.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28168 on: May 14, 2007, 09:47:23 PM »
  ::) This happens because the taller guy will have less subcutaneous fat, not because he is taller. If the % of bodyfat to mucle mass is the same between the two, then stature is irrelevant. The weight of bones and organs does not affect separations, so it was not necessary to bring it up. Fat to mucle ratio is a factor in separations, stature to muscle is not. ;)


Thank god for SUCKMYDICK explaining this for everyone else. He actually believes he knows more, regurgitates these home-made theories over and over again. Priceless. 8)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28169 on: May 14, 2007, 10:03:19 PM »
Thank god for SUCKMYDICK explaining this for everyone else. He actually believes he knows more, regurgitates these home-made theories over and over again. Priceless. 8)

  Like your theories about training that you come up with while you do cable curls on your Bowflex? ;) Or your conspiracy theories about how Blacks are kept down by the I.F.B.B? ;) Owned. 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28170 on: May 14, 2007, 10:06:27 PM »
hahaha brutal failed attempt at photoshopping the stained walls, hardcore phone book to level out the uneven floor.  ;D
TEAM REPTILIAN

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28171 on: May 14, 2007, 10:08:18 PM »
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
TEAM REPTILIAN

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28172 on: May 15, 2007, 05:26:17 AM »
hahaha brutal failed attempt at photoshopping the stained walls, hardcore phone book to level out the uneven floor.  ;D
Neither he nor you figured out that the shot's fine with me. The attempted deflections go nowhere bwahahahaahahahahahahaha hah

Now back to your miserable reality and Coleman's "tiny" traps - realkarate, his tiny brain and pink belt deal with THIS..

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28173 on: May 15, 2007, 05:29:44 AM »
  Like your theories about training that you come up with while you do cable curls on your Bowflex? ;) Or your conspiracy theories about how Blacks are kept down by the I.F.B.B? ;) Owned. 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
hahahaah cumster swings his dick around his bowflex..cumster is a massive sissy guy
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #28174 on: May 15, 2007, 05:51:44 AM »
The Yates-Branch similarities grow more obvious, as is the incessant ball-worship  from pasty white guys. ;D