Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

And having 2 twigs for arms, barrel torso and crap quads does?

Yates quads are hardly crap here 

Yates looks amazing in these 92O backstage shots.

But he also beats Coleman in his amazing 93 form as well 

[pobrecito]

Oh boy.......Sucky is going to lay a smackdown come October !

I don't care if I get 2nd to last place, so long as I beat that fag Suckmyasshole.

[NeoSeminole]

Oh boy.......Sucky is going to lay a smackdown come October!

prepare to lose one of your fellow nuthuggers.

[pobrecito]

prepare to lose one of your fellow nuthuggers.

You do realize Sucky has rowed a 200lb DB for 3 reps?

Plus, I may consider competing and blowing you away as well.

[IceCold]

He has everything Platz has and in his thighs and it's bigger. I think they are better, but every one is different.

I didn't say legs.

LMAO

[IceCold]

And having 2 twigs for arms, barrel torso and crap quads does?

ronnie's legs look horrid in those shots.

no cuts and virtually no sweep.

so much for the 01 AC of ronnie.

[NeoSeminole]

ronnie's legs look horrid in those shots. no cuts and virtually no sweep. so much for the 01 AC of ronnie.

ha ha ha ha, the retard strikes again!

[IceCold]

ha ha ha ha, the retard strikes again!

notice, i said that shot. 

[NeoSeminole]

notice, i said that shot.

stop lying you c*cksucker.

no cuts and virtually no sweep. so much for the 01 AC of ronnie.

[Hulkster]

just for the record, if you read many internet forums on bodybuilding, there are MANY people out there that think Ronnie has better quads than Platz.

just look at these shots:

you can't tell me little Tom has anything on these:

they make even his quads look small and they are just as cut (if not deeper cuts) and the same shape:

[pobrecito]

just for the record, if you read many internet forums on bodybuilding, there are MANY people out there that think Ronnie has better quads than Platz.

just look at these shots:

you can't tell me little Tom has anything on these:

they make even his quads look small and they are just as cut (if not deeper cuts) and the same shape:

Ronnie's quads were bigger, but Platz had way better sweep and let's not even get into the legs as a whole, Ronnie's not even top 10 there.

[Hulkster]

if you are taking calves into account sure, but not quads.

Ronnie's quads are just as good if not better.

look at the battle for the O. 2002 shots with Ronnie at 275 with sliced quads.

those blow little tom platz's away..

[pobrecito]

Ronnie's legs got nothing on these 

[pobrecito]

if you are taking calves into account sure, but not quads.

Ronnie's quads are just as good if not better.

look at the battle for the O. 2002 shots with Ronnie at 275 with sliced quads.

those blow little tom platz's away..

So what do you suggest we do, cut Ronnie's legs off at the knees and have him waddle on stage 

[Iceman1981]

why is ronnie facing at an angle?

all the ronnie clowns said that exact same thing from forced reps comparision, even when the two pictures were taken at the exact same angle

the excuses and hypocrisy just keep on piling.

almost as high as dumpster's collection of phone books to adjust his home gym/bowflex/waste of time.

From what you just said makes Ronnie at a "disadvantage" because he is standing at an angle causing us not to see the full width or how big Ronnie's back is. I have your dumb ass covered. Here is a shot of Ronnie from straight on destroying yates. Ronnie is wider, bigger and has more detail.

[Iceman1981]

ronnie's legs look horrid in those shots.

no cuts and virtually no sweep.

so much for the 01 AC of ronnie.

Now you're just talking out of your ass.

[IceCold]

From what you just said makes Ronnie at a "disadvantage" because he is standing at an angle causing us not to see the full width or how big Ronnie's back is. I have your dumb ass covered. Here is a shot of Ronnie from straight on destroying yates. Ronnie is wider, bigger and has more detail.

well, at least the shot is straight on now.

[IceCold]

just for the record, if you read many internet forums on bodybuilding, there are MANY people out there that think

no, they dont.

post anything where anyone but the dooshes on this thread think so.

[IceCold]

it is not even close.

ronnie has never had cross striations on his legs.

you guys are pathetic.

you think he has the greatest bodyparts ever, when in reality - again, a strange concept, he has never won a 'best bodypart' award voted on by thousands of readers in any publication.



this shot says it all.

[IceCold]

here's to iceman and his claim with ronnie for best ever quads:

 

[pobrecito]

From what you just said makes Ronnie at a "disadvantage" because he is standing at an angle causing us not to see the full width or how big Ronnie's back is. I have your dumb ass covered. Here is a shot of Ronnie from straight on destroying yates. Ronnie is wider, bigger and has more detail.

Bullshit.

Same contest and looking like a piece of rat feces 

[IceCold]

iceman, remember when ronnie did not even win the 'best legs' award in 2005, yet still won the contest.



he couldnt even win that title, and you think he has the best legs of all time.

LMAO.

[IceCold]

Bullshit.

Same contest and looking like a piece of rat feces 

looks like he's at a guest posing.

[RocketSwitch625]

If this is the "sum of the parts" i want a refund.

Congratulations Pumpster, you've posted this pic of Yates for the 1,000th time in this one thread. You've just won yourself a time-share apartment in the Lebanon. Or you can have a week in Baghdad with a tank and a tin hat. The choice is yours. We're not bothered.

[Hulkster]

iceman, remember when ronnie did not even win the 'best legs' award in 2005, yet still won the contest.



he couldnt even win that title, and you think he has the best legs of all time.

LMAO.

gee could it have been  because Ronnie was not in his best shape in 2005?

in 2003 his quads blew everyone's away, even Jay admitted in his column that ronnie's quads  killed his...