Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3484312 times)

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29475 on:** June 04, 2007, 10:57:39 AM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on June 04, 2007, 10:33:40 AM

Are you being serious? Opinions are like assholes, granted, but Ronnie is clearly holding more fat and water in this comparison you've posted. I could have found many much better pics of Coleman to post. Like I've said some hundreds of pages ago, you're a terrible advocate for Ronald Coleman. And that is not fat; it is skin. My guess is that Dorian is arching backwards more than Ronnie in this comparison, which explains why the skin in the lower end of his back folds. If Ronnie were at the same angle, his skin would fold more.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Sure it does:

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #29476 on:** June 04, 2007, 11:25:25 AM »

Look at Coleman in this comparison. Talk about a collection of body parts thrown together. LOL

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #29477 on:** June 04, 2007, 11:33:21 AM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 07:20:46 AM

You dipshit, the point is, nobody is seeing it. You had to use that lame ass shot becuase you couldn't find a true front lat without Dorian having a flat midsection

ha ha ha ha. I posted a side shot of Ronnie to prove he didn't have a distended midsection in the front lat spread. So you can shut the f*ck up now, little girl. It's funny you keep flapping your gums and getting owned post after post. Sometimes I think you are just doing it to be an annoying troll. I find it hard to believe that someone could actually be as dumb as you.

Quote

this tells me that deep down you know Ronnie has a gut protruding out when hitting the front lat, even in his small, latless, AC form hahahahahaha

not really, I posted a shot of Ronnie from the side without a gut in the front lat spread. Why would I think deep down that his stomach protrudes when it obviously didn't?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #29478 on:** June 04, 2007, 11:36:01 AM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on June 04, 2007, 10:33:40 AM

Are you being serious? Opinions are like assholes, granted, but Ronnie is clearly holding more fat and water in this comparison you've posted. I could have found many much better pics of Coleman to post. Like I've said some hundreds of pages ago, you're a terrible advocate for Ronald Coleman. And that is not fat; it is skin. My guess is that Dorian is arching backwards more than Ronnie in this comparison, which explains why the skin in the lower end of his back folds. If Ronnie were at the same angle, his skin would fold more.

wtf pics are you looking at?

Ronnie is more dry and shredded from head to toe in this comparison. Dorian looks like he's carrying at least 5 lbs of fat in his glutes alone. Forget about comparing them from the front.

pumpster · « **Reply #29479 on:** June 04, 2007, 11:36:35 AM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 04, 2007, 11:25:25 AM

Look at Coleman in this comparison. Talk about a collection of body parts thrown together. LOL

Good job making the case for Coleman, his tapers are so much more pronounced than pancake-flat Yates.

IceCold · « **Reply #29480 on:** June 04, 2007, 12:35:58 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 04, 2007, 11:36:35 AM

his tapers are so much more pronounced than pancake-flat Yates.

true, but that didnt do anything for ronnie during 92-97.

his taper for the most part was irrelevant.

ronnie didnt start winning bc of his taper, he won bc of his improvement in conditioning and fullness.

that and everyone else starting going downhill (cue plasma expanders from chad

).

IceCold · « **Reply #29481 on:** June 04, 2007, 12:38:45 PM »

whether ronnie is flexing or not, but the conditioning is much greater for dorian than ronnie.

just check the abs and chest.

ronnie's arms are bigger, but that's about it.

yates is fuller, dryer, and harder.

pobrecito · « **Reply #29482 on:** June 04, 2007, 01:03:58 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on June 04, 2007, 10:46:31 AM

Pubes, stop being biased for once. It seems like every post you make towards Ronnie is pure hate.

Ronnie has just as good lats as yates. I'm not saying yates lats are better or vice versa. They both had great lats. Take a look:

It's hardly hate.

Ronnie is my 2nd favorite bodybuilder to Yates, a very close 2nd.

The reason I prefer Yates is becuase I feel he was a much more cerebral bodybuilder, and he did much more in a shorter time period with his genetics than anyone else ever has.

Hulkster · « **Reply #29483 on:** June 04, 2007, 01:57:13 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 04, 2007, 12:38:45 PM

whether ronnie is flexing or not, but the conditioning is much greater for dorian than ronnie.

just check the abs and chest.

ronnie's arms are bigger, but that's about it.

yates is fuller, dryer, and harder.

are you serious? here is ronnie backstage at the AC displaying conditioning that dorian NEVER displayed from the front:

pumpster · « **Reply #29484 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:06:23 PM »

Yates seriously OWNED (again/yawn)..do i see a trend after 37 pics involving 5-6 BBs who've owned his pasty ass?

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=152768.0

Dillet seen here once again demolishing Yates LOL

Skinheads rocket & ice, prepare the excuses..

.

Hulkster · « **Reply #29485 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:14:22 PM »

so much for ronnie looking 'tiny' at the AC:

his back had so much muscle (even when relaxed) it was practically hanging off of him:

pobrecito · « **Reply #29486 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:20:41 PM »

Brutal synthol'd calves LOL

pumpster · « **Reply #29487 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:25:39 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 02:20:41 PM

Brutal synthol'd calves LOL

Brutal pubes ownage for the same desperate claim here LOL Apparently everyone but Yates.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=152768.0

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29488 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:35:31 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 04, 2007, 02:25:39 PM

Brutal pubes ownage for the same desperate claim here LOL Apparently everyone but Yates.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=152768.0

LOL, I saw that

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29489 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:47:02 PM »

Here is some muscle hanging off of a back:

pobrecito · « **Reply #29490 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:59:24 PM »

21" gunz: load those magazines!

Hulkster · « **Reply #29491 on:** June 04, 2007, 02:59:38 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 04, 2007, 02:25:39 PM

Brutal pubes ownage for the same desperate claim here LOL Apparently everyone but Yates.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=152768.0

hahahahahaha

read it carefully Pubes, Icehole and co.

you will note that most believe what we have been saying and proving all along..

pobrecito · « **Reply #29492 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:02:35 PM »

If Yates was in Coleman's 99 condition, he would be 290 at the 95 Olympia...just look at the size

Hulkster · « **Reply #29493 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:03:01 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 02:59:24 PM

21" gunz: load those magazines!

21 inches my ass.

if those are 21 inches, these are 25:

dorian's arms look about the same size as vicky's

Hulkster · « **Reply #29494 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:03:41 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:02:35 PM

If Yates was in Coleman's 99 condition, he would be 290 at the 95 Olympia...just look at the size

brutal twigs on a barrel there..

pobrecito · « **Reply #29495 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:04:44 PM »

Dorian's size was unbelievable in 95....I've even heard reports that one woman even shit her pants at the sight of Yates' brutal muscularity

pobrecito · « **Reply #29496 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:06:17 PM »

Coleman embarrassed again LOL

I mean just look at it, this one is for all you dumb nutt-huggers. Pictured is Ronnie in his 01AC form (245lbs) clearly less muscular than the 260lb 95 dorian (backstage shot).

pobrecito · « **Reply #29497 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:07:50 PM »

the nutt-huggers can't have their cake and eat it too.

Any time conditioning comes up, que the 01AC pics....any time size comes up, que 2003 LOL. Yates at his best had size AND condition Coleman could only dream of

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29498 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:09:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 04, 2007, 03:03:01 PM

21 inches my ass.

if those are 21 inches, these are 25:

dorian's arms look about the same size as vicky's

LOL, that was brutal

Hulkster · « **Reply #29499 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:12:38 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:07:50 PM

the nutt-huggers can't have their cake and eat it too.

Any time conditioning comes up, que the 01AC pics....any time size comes up, que 2003 LOL. Yates at his best had size AND condition Coleman could only dream of

no, cue the 99 shots that are the best of both worlds: