Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3484283 times)

pobrecito · « **Reply #29500 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:13:16 PM »

Ronnie was dough in 99. Flex claims he should have won.

pobrecito · « **Reply #29501 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:16:48 PM »

Perfection:

Hulkster · « **Reply #29502 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:17:11 PM »

LOL you think this was dough?

are you dumb or just stupid?

I can tell you are just pissed off because dorian is being made to look like the overrated olympian that he was in the other thread..

pobrecito · « **Reply #29503 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:18:59 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 04, 2007, 03:17:11 PM

LOL you think this was dough?

are you dumb or just stupid?

I can tell you are just pissed off because dorian is being made to look like the overrated olympian that he was in the other thread..

Overrated? Coleman has received more gifts than any BB in history: 2001, 2002, 2004, and 2005. 2001 was utter bullshit. It actually would have been more appropriate had Ronnie won last year and Cutler in 01

IceCold · « **Reply #29504 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:19:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 04, 2007, 01:57:13 PM

are you serious? here is ronnie backstage at the AC displaying conditioning that dorian NEVER displayed from the front:

i was going just from that 1 shot.

not necessarily, the whole contest.

just that one shot of the MM for a differente perspective.

IceCold · « **Reply #29505 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:20:28 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 04, 2007, 03:12:38 PM

no, cue the 99 shots that are the best of both worlds:

than something would have been said in 99.

not 6 years later referring to 2003.

Rampage · « **Reply #29506 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:24:53 PM »

where the flip do you bitches find these pictures ? 4 rreal ?

Btw ya`ll ....yourll keep posting the same fucken pics

IceCold · « **Reply #29507 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:32:21 PM »

Quote from: Rampage on June 04, 2007, 03:24:53 PM

where the flip do you bitches find these pictures ? 4 rreal ?

Btw ya`ll ....yourll keep posting the same fucken pics

looks like somebody has spike tv.

rampage has fought since 2000.

pumpster · « **Reply #29508 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:40:50 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:04:44 PM

Dorian's size was unbelievable in 95....I've even heard reports that one woman even shit her pants at the sight of Yates' brutal muscularity

The actual story is that he looked like shit.

pumpster · « **Reply #29509 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:42:38 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:06:17 PM

Coleman embarrassed again LOL

I mean just look at it, this one is for all you dumb nutt-huggers. Pictured is Ronnie in his 01AC form (245lbs) clearly less muscular than the 260lb 95 dorian (backstage shot).

Those are your classic Ironage crap comparisons! Here's actual scale - Yates OWNED.

Hulkster · « **Reply #29510 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:49:49 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 04, 2007, 03:20:28 PM

than something would have been said in 99.

not 6 years later referring to 2003.

it WAS said in 99, read the muscle and fitness review of the contest - first page inside. I don't have the mag any more though. maybe someone else does and can quote it.

it commented on the incredible combo of size and detail.

also the ironman review praised ronnie's 99 shape, noting in particular how cut his quads were (they lacked deep cuts in 98)

phyxsius · « **Reply #29511 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:51:05 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 04, 2007, 03:42:38 PM

Those are your classic Ironage crap comparisons! Here's actual scale - Yates OWNED.

but who won in the end?

DORIAN YATES was eating Coleman alive and took home the Sandow

IceCold · « **Reply #29512 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:57:22 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 04, 2007, 03:49:49 PM

it WAS said in 99, read the muscle and fitness review of the contest - first page inside. I don't have the mag any more though. maybe someone else does and can quote it.

it commented on the incredible combo of size and detail.

also the ironman review praised ronnie's 99 shape, noting in particular how cut his quads were (they lacked deep cuts in 98)

i have that issue and will check it out.

no doube every report commented on coleman's combo of size, shape, and conditioning.

but saying his package was the obvious winner and one of the best packages of all time are entirely 2 different things.

i seriously do not recall any olympia report from 99 saying that coleman, on that day, was the best ever or one of.

from 95 and 93, it was said about yates.

Hulkster · « **Reply #29513 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:58:28 PM »

Quote from: phyxsius on June 04, 2007, 03:51:05 PM

but who won in the end?

DORIAN YATES was eating Coleman alive and took home the Sandow

of course he did. Look at the difference from 95 Ronnie to 99 Ronnie

:

Hulkster · « **Reply #29514 on:** June 04, 2007, 03:59:22 PM »

notice how much more detailed and wider ronnie was in 99..

phyxsius · « **Reply #29515 on:** June 04, 2007, 04:01:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 04, 2007, 03:58:28 PM

of course he did. Look at the difference from 95 Ronnie to 99 Ronnie :

it's a bit unfortunate that Dorian wasn't there at 99 when Ronnie doubled up his stack of drugs

pobrecito · « **Reply #29516 on:** June 04, 2007, 04:02:52 PM »

The holy grail, the 01ASC bwahahahahahaha

UGLY and small

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #29517 on:** June 04, 2007, 04:16:08 PM »

In a way I admire Coleman for going from this:

To this (all drugs):

But not for this:

pumpster · « **Reply #29518 on:** June 04, 2007, 04:41:30 PM »

Quote from: phyxsius on June 04, 2007, 03:51:05 PM

but who won in the end?

DORIAN YATES was eating Coleman alive and took home the Sandow

You're saying that all contests are fair, apparently.

pumpster · « **Reply #29519 on:** June 04, 2007, 04:43:27 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 04, 2007, 04:16:08 PM

In a way I admire Coleman for going from this:

To this (all drugs):

But not for this:

I don't admire "the keg" for this..

Hulkster · « **Reply #29520 on:** June 04, 2007, 05:23:53 PM »

the man has an upper body unmatched by anyone to date on stage..

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29521 on:** June 04, 2007, 05:39:17 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:13:16 PM

Ronnie was dough in 99. Flex claims he should have won.

Are you losing it? Seriously, what are you smoking? Ronnie was dough in 99? Flex should of won? LOL. It can't get worse than you. Even yates biggest fan ND wouldn't have said Ronnie looks like dough in 99. If anyone looks like dough, it's that oil filled Flex. Look for yourself. After seeing these pics and you still think Ronnie looks like dough, then you must really hate Ronnie.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29522 on:** June 04, 2007, 05:42:22 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:13:16 PM

Ronnie was dough in 99. Flex claims he should have won.

LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #29523 on:** June 04, 2007, 05:46:37 PM »

god damn ronnie's back was the complete package in 99. just look at that prejudging shot

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #29524 on:** June 04, 2007, 05:54:28 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 04, 2007, 03:18:59 PM

Overrated? Coleman has received more gifts than any BB in history: 2001, 2002, 2004, and 2005. 2001 was utter bullshit. It actually would have been more appropriate had Ronnie won last year and Cutler in 01

Ok genius. Who should of beaten Ronie in 2004/2005? Ronnie had 2 bad years in 2001/2002 out of the 8 years as Mr. Olympia. Where as yates had 3 bad years out of 6 years as Mr. Olympia and could of lost also in 94/96/97. You are the only one talking this crap. Is it because you can't back up your argument when you post? What the hell are you smoking?