Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

is that because hardcore muscle is smooth and unrefined?

I guess your right.

Your nutt-hugging is simply unbelievable.

Coleman is more aesthetic and shapely in the most-muscular, but Dorian is murdering Ronnie there in condition and hardness. You can claim all day that Ronnie beats Dorian, but the Yates fans deal in reality, whereas you all deal in fantasy land. Dorian defeated Ronnie all 8 times they faced eachother. He also dominated much more shapely bodybuilders in their primes that were well larger in weight than him. The more I see of Ronnie the less impressed I am - especially the 01ASC.....I think he was much better at the 98O becuase he didnt have the nasty gut and gap between his abs

[pobrecito]

Coleman's all-time best the 98O:

top condition and most dry back of his whole career.

[IceCold]

LOL here we go again..

you are running into the same problem ND did:

you can't counter the countless shots of dorian lookiing bad compared to Ronnie, so instead you have to try and counter them by using opinions that mean nothing because they are clearly not validated by reality.

here is a lesson Icecold:

all the opinions in the world will not thicken up dorian's rear double bi. It is flat as a pancake compared to Ronnie's.

deal with it.

you still dont get it.

when you say dorian's back is flat or whatever, that's your opinion. 

i dont agree with it and that's just your opinion.

when i say dorian's back is better, that's my opinion.

that's also ronnie coleman's opinion.

do you see the difference?

you have no one other than iceman to support your view, where as ronnie supports mine.

that's the point of the quotes. 

[phyxsius]

you still dont get it.

when you say dorian's back is flat or whatever, that's your opinion. 

i dont agree with it and that's just your opinion.

when i say dorian's back is better, that's my opinion.

that's also ronnie coleman's opinion.

do you see the difference?

you have no one other than iceman to support your view, where as ronnie supports mine.

that's the point of the quotes. 

Hulkster can't see well because he's still sucking Ronnie's nuts

[RocketSwitch625]

Coleman's all-time best the 98O:

top condition and most dry back of his whole career.

Why does Ronnie Spazman always pose to porno music?

[whitewidow]

I'll be the bigger man and say enough is enough , the board is sick of our ' debates ' obviously neither of us are going to convince each other of our opinions , and we've basically said everything we could , so I say lets end this debate out of respect for others , I say you and I stop directly comparing Ronnie & Dorian and leave well enough alone and let the board have a rest lol the ball is now in your court . 

stop this war right now!

[Hulkster]

when you say dorian's back is flat or whatever, that's your opinion. 

i dont agree with it and that's just your opinion.

but my opinion is SUPPORTED AND VALIDATED BY REALITY RIGHT HERE:

yours is NOT:

[phyxsius]

but Dorian is the only bodybuilder who had the Christmas tree on his lower back while doing a back double bi

[pobrecito]

but Dorian is the only bodybuilder who had the Christmas tree on his lower back while doing a back double bi

Dorian was so shredded you could actually see the insertions of the lats into the lower back 

[Iceman1981]

but my opinion is SUPPORTED AND VALIDATED BY REALITY RIGHT HERE:

yours is NOT:

I think you mean when you say "flat looking", it's because Coleman's muscles in the back double bi "flares" out more than yates. It looks thicker/wider and has more of a "3D" look to it than a yates "2D" look. Coleman's back and lats just "Pop" out at you, where as yates back, well it just doesn't. Just look at it, yates entire back including his lats are not as thick/wide or "3D" looking as Coleman's. Here is a brighter version of the comparison. you can clearly see Coleman's back and lats is thicker, wider and has that "Pop" out at you "3D" look, compared to yates "flat looking" "2D" look. It's not that hard. Just look at the pic. You can't argue against it.

[pobrecito]

I think you mean when you say "flat looking", it's because Coleman's muscles in the back double bi "flares" out more than yates. It looks thicker/wider and has more of a "3D" look to it than a yates "2D" look. Coleman's back and lats just "Pop" out at you, where as yates back, well it just doesn't. Just look at it, yates entire back including his lats are not as thick/wide or "3D" looking as Coleman's. Here is a brighter version of the comparison. you can clearly see Coleman's back and lats is thicker, wider and has that "Pop" out at you "3D" look, compared to yates "flat looking" "2D" look. It's not that hard. Just look at the pic. You can't argue against it.

That's becuase Ronnie's back is puffy, soft, and full of water (in comparison to Yates). I mean just look at the deltoids, Dorian's appear hard as a rock whereas Ronnie's just look soft. Yates wins.

[NeoSeminole]

but Dorian is the only bodybuilder who had the Christmas tree on his lower back while doing a back double bi

big deal. Dorian's lower back is so flat it looks like it belongs to a 12 yr. anorexic when compared to Ronnie's. You can actually see Ronnie's erector spinae bulging out at you. By the way, Dorian isn't the only bodybuilder who had a Christmas tree during the back double biceps.

[NeoSeminole]

Dorian was so shredded you could actually see the insertions of the lats into the lower back

heh heh, dumbass. You are referring to his lat origins - NOT insertions.

[pobrecito]

God damn ronnie is owned here hahahahaha

[NeoSeminole]

God damn ronnie is owned here hahahahaha

bwahahahahaha, go home troll. Ronnie has the same definition with better thickness, fullness, and taper.

[pobrecito]

bwahahahahaha, go home troll. Ronnie has the same definition with better thickness, fullness, and taper.

Actually it's this all over again, Dorian dominating a small and narrow Coleman:

Furthur proof that the 01ASC is nothing but a myth

[NeoSeminole]

Actually it's this all over again, Dorian dominating a small and narrow Coleman:

Furthur proof that the 01ASC is nothing but a myth

ha ha ha, pussy. Why do you run away from the truth? Stop comparing a prime Dorian to a neophyte Ronnie. Here are both at their respective primes. Ronnie is owning Dorian on back. Even Peter McGough went on to remark that Ronnie has the greatest back of all-time.

[pobrecito]

ha ha ha, pussy. Why do you run away from the truth? Stop comparing a prime Dorian to a neophyte Ronnie. Here are both at their respective primes. Ronnie is owning Dorian on back. Even Peter McGough went on to remark that Ronnie has the greatest back of all-time.

Not even close, remeber after the 99 Olympia Dorian was crowned as having the best back, even Ronnie admits that LOL.

Ronnie's back is soft and puffy, an indicator of him holding a great deal more fat and water in his back that Yates. Also, let's not even get into width and thickness where the 260lbs Yates destroys Coleman. Coleman was outmassed by Dennis James and Craig Titus at that show LOL

[IceCold]

, Dorian isn't the only bodybuilder who had a Christmas tree during the back double biceps.

when making claims, it helps to post pictures to prove your point.

post a fucckking picture of someone with a xmas tree in the back double bi.

it sure as hell aint ronnie.

[IceCold]

if ronnie's back was so much better than dorina's, he would have won this poll.

it was taken in the january 2000 issue of FLEX.

two years past 98 and 1 year past 99.

[IceCold]

but my opinion is SUPPORTED AND VALIDATED BY REALITY RIGHT HERE:

yours is NOT:

you still dont get it.

your opinion is not a fact.

yates is killing ronnie in that shot.

better back, better traps, xmas tree, calves, delts, harder, and dryer.

ronnie's arms are better.

wow. 

[IceCold]

ha ha ha, pussy. Why do you run away from the truth? Stop comparing a prime Dorian to a neophyte Ronnie. Here are both at their respective primes. Ronnie is owning Dorian on back. Even Peter McGough went on to remark that Ronnie has the greatest back of all-time.

the excuses continue.

ronnie wasnt in his prime

or

politics and biased judging.

deal with reality:  ronnie was never close to beating dorian - or even getting 2nd fuccking place.

[NeoSeminole]

Not even close, remeber after the 99 Olympia Dorian was crowned as having the best back, even Ronnie admits that LOL.

most industry experts agree that Ronnie reached his peak at either the 01 ASC or 03 Mr. Olympia - both occurred after 99. So your source is obsolete in this debate.

Ronnie's back is soft and puffy, an indicator of him holding a great deal more fat and water in his back that Yates. Also, let's not even get into width and thickness where the 260lbs Yates destroys Coleman. Coleman was outmassed by Dennis James and Craig Titus at that show LOL

silly fagg*t, we've been through this many times already. A 250 lbs Ronnie is not the same a 250 lbs Dorian. Ronnie has smaller joints, a narrower waist, and fuller muscle bellies compared to a blocky Dorian with flat muscles. The result is Ronnie at 247 lbs looks just as big as Dorian at 257 lbs (or 260 lbs for that matter). It's so much fun owning you.

[pobrecito]

Why are you posting comparisons where Ronnie is getting his ass kicked? LOL.

Here are some accurate comparisons...including the most accurate comparison of all....Ronnie side by side with Dorian getting his ass handed to him hahahahahaha:

[NeoSeminole]

the excuses continue.

omg, you are so f*cking dumb. How is that an excuse? You're comparing Dorian during his Olympia reign to a neophyte Ronnie. It would be like comparing Dorian from 89 to a 99 Ronnie.

deal with reality:  ronnie was never close to beating dorian - or even getting 2nd fuccking place.

no shit, Dorian stopped competing b/c he was scared of losing to a prime Ronnie.