see if you had any sort of brain what so ever you would realize that the time span required to reach peak form means nothing.
its the peak form that counts.
dorian was not as good as Ronnie at his best.
whether it took ronnie 4 years or 40 years to get there makes no difference.
all that matters is THIS:
for the most part you are right, but every advantage you say ronnie had, he had back then.
in fact it was better - his taper, midsection, details, striations, etc.
by the way, your attempt at posting the worst possible shot of yates vs. the best one you could find of ronnie is getting old.
no one pays attention to your posts anymore.
you've been doing it for 1200 pages now.
