Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3488871 times)

pobrecito · « **Reply #30550 on:** June 25, 2007, 06:59:25 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 25, 2007, 06:56:29 PM

LOL and the added size brought him this: $:-\$

a 257 pound coleman just crushes a 275 pound Kova...er...I mean Yates:

Dorian would DWARF Coleman hahaha...Coleman is barely outsizing Wheeler $:-\$

Hulkster · « **Reply #30551 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:03:37 PM »

LOL since when is bodybuilding only about size?

its quality that counts too, which is probably why 99 ronnie can get 45 votes and 93 dorian only gets 4..hahahhahaahahaha

pobrecito · « **Reply #30552 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:07:21 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 25, 2007, 07:03:37 PM

LOL since when is bodybuilding only about size?

its quality that counts too, which is probably why 99 ronnie can get 45 votes and 93 dorian only gets 4..hahahhahaahahaha

Considering that Dorian's back is superior, that gives him a huge advantage over Ronnie in a contest

Hulkster · « **Reply #30553 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:19:59 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 25, 2007, 07:07:21 PM

Considering that Dorian's LOWER back ONLY is superior, that doesn't give him a huge advantage over Ronnie in a contest

fixed

pobrecito · « **Reply #30554 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:28:11 PM »

hahaha Ronnie is soft...more comparable to Flex....to quote an ironager....I've seen both and Dorian is in another league

Hulkster · « **Reply #30555 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:30:21 PM »

LOL ronnie is not soft. thats what you get when you actually have muscle on your back..

dorian is as thin as a pancake in that pose..has the same thickness as Flex..Ronnie has the best of both worlds - detail with thickness, not one or the other like dorian and flex have..

probably why dorian only got 4 votes and counting..hahahaha

pobrecito · « **Reply #30556 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:34:18 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 25, 2007, 07:30:21 PM

LOL ronnie is not soft. thats what you get when you actually have muscle on your back..

Your stupidity is unbelievable. Dorian's back was FAR more heavily muscled than Ronnie's, especially in his puny ASC form.

Dorian's traps are just muscle upon layer of muscle.....so thick he appears to have muscles than Coleman doesn't even have

Hulkster · « **Reply #30557 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:58:20 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 25, 2007, 07:34:18 PM

Your stupidity is unbelievable. Dorian's back was FAR more heavily muscled than Ronnie's, especially in his puny ASC form.

Dorian's traps are just muscle upon layer of muscle.....so thick he appears to have muscles than Coleman doesn't even have

LOL puny AC form?

Hulkster · « **Reply #30558 on:** June 25, 2007, 07:59:13 PM »

as usual, dorian's pancake back looks thin as hell to Ronnie's greatest back ever..

Hulkster · « **Reply #30559 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:02:10 PM »

dorian is on par with flex for overall back thinness $:-\$

Hulkster · « **Reply #30560 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:03:22 PM »

hey pubes, here is your "puny" Ronnie with a relaxed back better than dorian at the 2001 AC:

Hulkster · « **Reply #30561 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:07:24 PM »

Ronnie clearly has flex's lines but with more thickness than dorian had.

dorian's back is just so THIN in the back double bi... $:-\$

pobrecito · « **Reply #30562 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:21:07 PM »

Dorian had a great haircut at the 1995 mr olympia

Hulkster · « **Reply #30563 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:38:44 PM »

yes, it was a great haircut...thin in the back..just like dorian!

pobrecito · « **Reply #30564 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:39:46 PM »

I prefer the mullet...more pizzaz

phyxsius · « **Reply #30565 on:** June 25, 2007, 10:05:50 PM »

Upper back, Ronnie got the slight edge with more packed muscle

Dorian had bigger and shredded shoulder compared to Ronnie although his 3 deltoid heads are clearly visible.

Lower back, Dorian won because you can see the Christmas tree even doing a back double bi. Dorian had better lower back insertion.

IceCold · « **Reply #30566 on:** June 26, 2007, 07:58:39 AM »

horrid gyno.

worst gyno of any olympia winner EVER.

there should be a rule,gyno - no olympia win.

physiques are debatable, but having gyno isnt.

pumpster · « **Reply #30567 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:07:20 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 26, 2007, 07:58:39 AM

there should be a rule,gyno - no olympia win.

physiques are debatable, but having gyno isnt.

GH guts, ab boils & bacne are unforgivable and unacceptable. Should not be allowable in contest "winners" especially.

pumpster · « **Reply #30568 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:09:47 PM »

Rampant Polumboism's also completely unacceptable as well as revolting.

pumpster · « **Reply #30569 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:10:31 PM »

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #30570 on:** June 26, 2007, 03:35:08 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 26, 2007, 12:10:31 PM

$:-\$

This thread is going nowhere with this crap. The Yates fans won the argument as soon as the first message was posted on page 1. I've followed this thread almost since day one although I got involved quite late into the argument. All it's doing now is going round and round in circles and going nowhere thanks to Hulkster, Pumpster and the rest of the stupid nuthuggers.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #30571 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:32:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 25, 2007, 06:53:36 PM

$:-\$

if only bodybuilding could be in 1999 again..

Even with a noticeably thicker waist Yates manages to look bigger/wider in the lats and delts than Coleman.

pumpster · « **Reply #30572 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:34:48 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 26, 2007, 03:35:08 PM

This thread is going nowhere with this crap. The Yates fans won the argument as soon as the first message was posted on page 1. I've followed this thread almost since day one although I got involved quite late into the argument. All it's doing now is going round and round in circles and going nowhere thanks to Hulkster, Pumpster and the rest of the stupid nuthuggers.

Consider the source a big bloated pasty donut specializing in silly pics LOL

pobrecito · « **Reply #30573 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:59:32 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 26, 2007, 04:32:46 PM

Even with a noticeably thicker waist Yates manages to look bigger/wider in the lats and delts than Coleman.

It's not looking wider, Yates WAS wider

phyxsius · « **Reply #30574 on:** June 26, 2007, 05:03:31 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 26, 2007, 04:34:48 PM

Consider the source a big bloated pasty donut specializing in silly pics LOL

Hey Rocket, has pumpster posted his pics yet?

Is he up to the challenge?