Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

It's taken me more than a year to notice that Labrada is sporting a Coleman shitty split 4 pack in this pic. LOL

thats only because you are unobservant .

I pointed this out a long time ago that labrada's abs were similar to ronnie's and all the Flea supporters tried their best to show he had great abs..lol

[pumpster]

It's taken me more than a year to notice that Labrada is sporting a Coleman shitty split 4 pack in this pic. LOL

You're slow as always because Flea looks like Oliva next to Yates.

[pumpster]

by the way, smart guy, "fetishize" is not a word.

epic community college education trying to sound smart.

somebody has seen "the program" with omar epps character too many times.

 

hahaha it is a word here in america you nutsucking skinhead limey who never finished high school.


Hope this helps

[Hulkster]

You're slow as always because Flea looks like Oliva next to Yates.

LOL!

[Iceman1981]

Any of these 3 years beats yates

[Iceman1981]

...

[Iceman1981]

....

[Iceman1981]

.....

[IceCold]

hahaha it is a word here in america you nutsucking skinhead limey who never finished high school.


Hope this helps

it so is not.

i even looked it up.

nice try

back to the bowflex in the dumpy apartment.

[IceCold]

LOL!

sure, he does.

by the way, lee kicked ronnie's ass that year at the olympia.

[kyomu]

If E.T. comes to the earth and asks me if show him the best BBing physic in the human history,i will show the pic of 03 Ronnie.

[IceCold]

If E.T. comes to the earth and asks me if show him the best BBing physic in the human history,i will show the pic of 03 Ronnie.

i would show 95 or 93 yates.

hulkster, notice how no one mentioned 99 ronnie.

again.

[Iceman1981]

i would show 95 or 93 yates.

hulkster, notice how no one mentioned 99 ronnie.

again.

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates?
It also mentioned 99' Ronnie here 108 votes to yates 93' 23 votes and yates 95' 32 votes
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3109401

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates?
It also mentioned 99' Ronnie here 39 votes to yates 93' 6 votes and yates 95' 10 votes
http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

Did I forget this one?
Who has the best back so far?
It also mentioned Ronnie here 207 votes to yates 103 votes.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=2974091

Oh look, here is another one.
The best PHYSIQUE ever in YOUR opinion?
Although Flex is winning this poll, It mentioned Ronnie with 59 votes to yates 20 votes
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3505431

These polls are from different sources and 2 of them specifically mention and show pics of a 99 & 03 Ronnie crushing a 93 & 95 yates. Face it, you and yates can't win. LOL 

[IceCold]

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates?
It also mentioned 99' Ronnie here 108 votes to yates 93' 23 votes and yates 95' 32 votes
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3109401

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates?
It also mentioned 99' Ronnie here 39 votes to yates 93' 6 votes and yates 95' 10 votes
http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

Did I forget this one?
Who has the best back so far?
It also mentioned Ronnie here 207 votes to yates 103 votes.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=2974091

Oh look, here is another one.
The best PHYSIQUE ever in YOUR opinion?
Although Flex is winning this poll, It mentioned Ronnie with 59 votes to yates 20 votes
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3505431

These polls are from different sources and 2 of them specifically mention and show pics of a 99 & 03 Ronnie crushing a 93 & 95 yates. Face it, you and yates can't win. LOL 

yates did win - for 7 years.

why do you continously ignore the polls i posted from musclemayhem and elite fitness?

[Iceman1981]

yates did win - for 7 years.

why do you continously ignore the polls i posted from musclemayhem and elite fitness?

Because for 1, your poll doesn't have any pics comparing the 2 at their best with the mandatory poses. The polls I posted does.

Second, 03 Ronnie by many is considered to be his best and I posted pics to compare with yates, incase you don't know yates got crushed.

Third, pics of 99 Ronnie that were in my poll were posted against both 93 & 95 yates and yates got killed AGAIN

My polls show both at their best and yates lost plain and simple. Why can't you accept that? LOL, once a sore loser, always a sore loser. 

[IceCold]

Because for 1, your poll doesn't have any pics comparing the 2 at their best with the mandatory poses. The polls I posted does.

Second, 03 Ronnie by many is considered to be his best and I posted pics to compare with yates, incase you don't know yates got crushed.

Third, pics of 99 Ronnie that were in my poll were posted against both 93 & 95 yates and yates got killed AGAIN

My polls show both at their best and yates lost plain and simple. Why can't you accept that? LOL, once a sore loser, always a sore loser. 

but, yet the polls i posted dont count???

of course, they have pictures - you never went to them. 

also, some of the polls i posted where from 99 or 2000, where the olympia was still fresh, but yet ronnie still lost.

i've acknowledged your polls, but like dumpster, you fail to recognize anythying that disagrees and proves you wrong - the definition of a sore loser.

[Hulkster]

LOL Icecold is being owned yet again!

108 votes to 23 LOL

[IceCold]

LOL Icecold is being owned yet again!

108 votes to 23 LOL

agian, 1 poll.

did you forget that ronnie is 0-30 against yates.

hahaha

owned. 


again.

[Iceman1981]

but, yet the polls i posted dont count???

of course, they have pictures - you never went to them. 

also, some of the polls i posted where from 99 or 2000, where the olympia was still fresh, but yet ronnie still lost.

i've acknowledged your polls, but like dumpster, you fail to recognize anythying that disagrees and proves you wrong - the definition of a sore loser.

Are you even reading anything that is posted? You have the ND syndrome. I showed comparison pics from Ronnie 99 & 03, yates 93 & 95 being compared and yates lost badly.

I saw the polls you posted , but they didn't have the best pics like what I posted comparing the 2 and I specifically made the poll for the best 2 years of Ronnie and yates. Guess what? yates lost. My poll was straight to the point and better organized. Plus I included an 03 Ronnie, which your poll didn't. That's the part you're not getting. And you keep saying that 99 Ronnie loses to yates and is not mentioned. Well the polls that I posted with better pics showed Ronnie 99 with more votes than yates. See if you compare the 2 like I did with great comparisons using their 2 best years for each guy, Ronnie comes out the winner at all times.

Take that to the bank.

[Iceman1981]

agian, 1 poll.

did you forget that ronnie is 0-30 against yates.

hahaha

owned. 


again.

I guess this moron doesn't know the point to this thread. Go figure 

[Hulkster]

Are you even reading anything that is posted? You have the ND syndrome

is it any wonder why getbiggers think these guys are, 'stupid' LOL

those comparison you made using the 99 ronnie and 93 yates shots were awesome, unbiased and fair..

and yates gets less than 10% of the vote in some cases LOL

[RocketSwitch625]

Down for the count.

Coleman after the 2007 Olympia.


Wait a minute...those calves look familiar. LOL

[Hulkster]

LOL

brutal similarities

[suckmymuscle]

 Ok, I'll tell you. The reason why I can only conceive you believing that Chris is superior to Dorian being racism is because Cormier had nothing on Dorian. It is perfectly reasoanble to accept that Coleman might defeat Dorian; he is comparable to Dorian at his best.

  However, Cormier simply doesen't have the muscle size and quality to defeat Dorian. The only thing that Cormier has on Dorian is that he has a better taper in the front relaxed round, but that'a bout it. Dorian takes him out in two of the three angles of the symmetry round as well as in all the seven mandatories - yes, even in the front double biceps.

  Side relaxed round - Dorian's pectoralis are thicker than Cormier, his calves are bigger and his serratus are better.

  Back relaxed round - Dorian's taper is much better, his back is much, much, much thikcer and wider and also harder. His claves and hams are also better.

  Back lat spread - Dorian's lats simply flare much wider and Dorian has better traps, hams, claves, etc.

  Back double biceps - Dorian's  back muscles are far more developed and separated than Cormier, and also look harder. Cormier might have him on biceps peak, but that's about it. Again, Dorian has the better calves, hams, etc.

  Side chest - Dorian's pecs are much thicker, as well as his vastus lateralis and calves. Dorian's serratus are also better.

  Side triceps - Dorian's triceps are better, as well as the clavea dn vastus lateralis.

  Front lat spread - Cormier doesen't have the lat development to compete with Dorian.

  -thAbs-andighs - Cormier's abs are no better than Dorian's, and Dorian has the thicker quads, but Coemier has better taper and might win.

  Most muscular - Dorian's pecs are thicker as well as his traps. They tie at best for arms, but I still think Dorian is better.

  So there you have it, Hulkster. Only someone completely deprived of objectivity would believe that Cormier had evena remorte chance of defeating Dorian. This is why I think that only something other than physique assement could make you say that Cormier would win.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
  

  Funny how Hulkster asks me to explain why I believe that he's a racist for saying that Cromier would defeat Dorian, and then I give him a lenghy explanation and he simply ignores it. The same can be said about SemenHole, who selectively chooses what to respond while ignoring most of my points.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

  Although not as good as Ronnie's, and say what you must about Dorian's crab shot, it revels the awesome thickness and striations of his pecs as well as his montrous traps. Superb.

SUCKMYMUSCLE