I've posted more pics on this thread than ALL of you , I've posted more quotes , IFBB criteria , I've done it all , I've covered my bases .
yes but none of it was in direct support of your argument for dorian vs ronnie.
thats the point you are missing.
you just don't seem to understand what is relevant and what is not.
Posting a quote praising dorian or a good shot of dorian is not support for Dorian OVER PEAK RONNIE.
There is a difference between showing dorian was good vs Showing dorian was good (or better) than a 1999 or 2001 AC ronnie coleman.
you don't seem to understand the distinction.
Sure, it shows dorian was good.
but that is not what we are debating.
Pre-tear, we all know he was good.
But relevative to peak Ronnie Coleman is what we are debating.
and what was good by itself can quickly become not that great when compared to Ronnie Coleman..