yes. just like we have been easily proving Peter McGough's opinions and the opinions of other wrong on this thread..

We we prove an opinion is wrong (and with visual evidence to boot) you dismiss it.
yet you try and now do the same thing, and you don't even use visual evidence in a visual sport..

Could you possibly be any more hypocritical or stupid?
I don't think so. 
The irony of you calling anyone a hypocrite and your ' visual evidence ' isn't fact its not even correct a correct opinion , you don't even know the damn criteria so how can your
opinion be taken seriously? it can't
And the quote that Ronnie is the most dominant bodybuilder ever is just plain bull shit again see his overall win/loss ratio of just 40% thats hardly dominating , or in fact he had three of the closest Mr Olympia contests in history thats not dominating kid , he had three very close calls he lost while Mr Olympia twice once in 2002 at the Show of Strength and he lost his Mr Olympia title I mean none of this is dominating and certainly NOT the most dominating of all time
Dorian has a win/loss ratio of 88% he never placed below second in a pro contest ever ! thats domination kid and he faced a higher caliber field of competition to boot.
from Jon Hotten's book Muscle
Coleman had not replicated the dominance of Haney and Yates. He always seemed slightly vulnerable, protected as much by protocol as his physique. stating the obvious , anyone who thinks Ronnie is the most dominate bodybuilder ever is an idiot.