That's maturity right there, lol.
Anyway, ND do you not think that quoting Lee Priest and Bev Francis carries less weight in this argument than the actually words of Dorian Yates, stating that latter-era super-massive 2003 Ronnie would 'probably win'. He thought it would be a tough one and that his own conditioning was superior, yet ultimately he felt the judges would pic Ronnie. Peter McGough quotes form 6 or 7 years prior to this also flail in comparison to The Shadow's own words.
Listen quoting them backs up my point in exactly why he would win , because he has better balance & proportion , better conditioning and density , better posing and presentation ! and the irony is Dorian said the judges would probably go with Ronnie based on a size advantage NOT a conditioning , density or balance advantage strictly a size advantage and the debate is could Dorian beat Ronnie at his best and his best isn't 2003 its 1998 Hulkster thinks 1999 and 2001 Arnold Classic and guess what? NO size advantage in these years . no conditioning advantage , no balance & proportion advantage , so Dorian didn't say " oh Ronnie wins hands down , he's so superior I don't stand a chance " like these guys fantasize about .
and my original point stands Dorian would beat Ronnie any year because he simply meets the judging criteria better than Ronnie .
