it is in the rear double bi pose compared to ronnie.
look at the lats in the pose. ronnie's are so thick and dorian's are flat...look to the center of the lower back and notice thickness of muscle in ronnie vs the flatness of dorian..
Ronnie's arms blow dorian's off the map as does the glutes and hams.
dorian has an edge in calves. thats it:
Ronnie 98 takes the pose. 99 was no different:
the edge in calves and thats it huh? spoken like a true ignorant , stop ignoring the criteria no he just doesn't have the edge in calves thats nonsense
balance & proportion muscular bulk density completeness First of all the pic of Dorian is taken at an angle and Ronnie's is more straight on , second Yates thickness in his back is unrivaled especially compared to a 249 pound Ronnie Coleman you can clearly see the thickness of Yates lats in the back double bicep in the form of the feathering of his lower lats something you can't see on Ronnie and the same for the erector spinae or lower back Dorian is unrivaled in thickness of his lower back do you see a christmas tree in Ronnie's lower back in this pose? NO its smooth
And Ronnie's arms DO NOT Blow Dorian off the map , this is another one of your gross overstatements NO they are BIGGER and thats it period . Dorian's arms show just as much separation as Ronnies and lets talk about balance & proportion which you keep running from and understandably so lol you need to , Ronnie's biceps/triceps and forearms are NOT in proportion with each other and they're to big for his small torso what the use of bigger arms?
Glutes and Hams , more straws for you , Dorian has striated glutes somehow you think because Ronnie has more his glutes are better this is such dumb logic , Dorian has more striations in his back so using your LOGIC Dorian's back is better than Ronnie
if Dorian didn't have any at all maybe you could use this as an advantage but spare me . oh and don't forget his glutes are hugely overdeveloped and are NOT in balance with the rest of his physique I mean they can be seen from the front thats NOT great balance & proportion and just when you think you have an edge you have nothing
Hamstrings , you keep typing this Muscular Development bullshit , again what does Ronnie have in terms of hams that Dorian didn't? explain this , stop typing generalizations , Dorian shows clear separation & development of the biceps femoris , semimembranosus and semitendinosus , learn anatomy before you type this nonsense
Again from head to toe using the criteria Dorian has better
balance & proportion in all poses compared to Ronnie 1998 he's bigger 257 pounds compared to 249 pounds , his conditioning & density are equal if not better than Ronnie , he's complete he has calves Dorian has everything in the back double biceps pose that Ronnie has and then some
