Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3480807 times)

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37025 on: November 22, 2007, 06:00:50 PM »
Childlike retort. The pic shows to the contrary, as opposed to your hearsay. ;D
Childlike eh?
I'm simply to lazy to sort through 1500 pages of tripe to try and find one picture to post, so you can dismiss it anyway and simply continue posting the same pics ad nauseum, like your convincing anyone of anything.
Maybe ND has it handy.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37026 on: November 22, 2007, 06:03:51 PM »
Childlike eh?
I'm simply to lazy to sort through 1500 pages of tripe to try and find one picture to post, so you can dismiss it anyway and simply continue posting the same pics ad nauseum, like your convincing anyone of anything.
Maybe ND has it handy.

That's exactly it, get off your ass instead of more of your internet diarrhea AKA speculation  LOL if ND's your point of reference you've already got problems.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37027 on: November 22, 2007, 06:11:44 PM »
That's exactly it, get off your ass instead of more of your internet diarrhea AKA speculation  LOL if ND's your point of reference you've already got problems.
Says the guy who regurgitates the same 5 pics through 1500 pages while using shitty one liners.  ::)

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37028 on: November 22, 2007, 06:20:03 PM »
1500 is mine

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37029 on: November 22, 2007, 06:20:49 PM »
Says the guy who regurgitates the same 5 pics through 1500 pages while using shitty one liners.  ::)

Someone seems extremely fascinated by those pics... :-* That's 5 pieces of proof that so far you haven't refuted whilst talking out your ass. ;D

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37030 on: November 22, 2007, 08:21:49 PM »
Not as dry?
Get out.
Ill give you the wide waist.
And he would dwarf Ronnie sans 2003+, where all of his flaws become glaringly obvious.
Sorry, saying hes not as dry and he would get dwarfed destroys any credibility your previous statements had.
He doesn't need to beat Ronnie on taper, he is complete, balanced, bigger, harder, and drier.
Get the fuck out.

yates in the 93 video is not drier than Ronnie in the pics I posted. yates barely has any seperations and he is not even close to having as many striations as Ronnie. Ronnie at 287 pounds to yates 269 pounds. That's a 18 pound advantage of pure mass for Ronnie over yates. Plus Ronnie has smaller joints and a lighter skeletal system than yates causing Ronnie to seriously have more muscle mass and dwarf yates. Plus Ronnie is taller. Therefore, yates is not bigger. Harder? yates fanclub still cannot explain this.

Nice try. Try again

Now you get the FUCK OUT

OWNED BYTCH

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37031 on: November 22, 2007, 08:27:42 PM »
yates in the 93 video is not drier than Ronnie in the pics I posted. yates barely has any seperations and he is not even close to having as many striations as Ronnie. Ronnie at 287 pounds to yates 269 pounds. That's a 18 pound advantage of pure mass for Ronnie over yates. Plus Ronnie has smaller joints and a lighter skeletal system than yates causing Ronnie to seriously have more muscle mass and dwarf yates. Plus Ronnie is taller. Therefore, yates is not bigger. Harder? yates fanclub still cannot explain this.

Nice try. Try again

Now you get the FUCK OUT

OWNED BYTCH
Ronnie at 287 has more striations.
Yep.
However, STRIATIONS DO NOT EQUAL CONDITIONING.
See how the lines between muscle groups are blurred on a 287 Ronnie?
Thats called WATER!!!!!
OMG!!!!!
That means he's not as dry, or GASP>... HARD!
Thats why any goddamn bodybuilder will tell you STRIATIONS do not indicate CONDITIONING!
Fuck even Pumpster admits Dorian has the edge in dryness/hardness.
Jesus you stupid fuck.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37032 on: November 22, 2007, 08:34:10 PM »
Ronnie at 287 has more striations.
Yep.
However, STRIATIONS DO NOT EQUAL CONDITIONING.
See how the lines between muscle groups are blurred on a 287 Ronnie?
Thats called WATER!!!!!
OMG!!!!!
That means he's not as dry, or GASP>... HARD!
Thats why any goddamn bodybuilder will tell you STRIATIONS do not indicate CONDITIONING!
Fuck even Pumpster admits Dorian has the edge in dryness/hardness.
Jesus you stupid fuck.

It's quite clear you are not looking at any pics as you type your usual bs. Not to mention you type your daily bs and don't back it up with anything. Like they say, "Put up, or shut up". Show me a gym pic of yates back this dry and seperated? Not even your famous new footage of yates 93 can help you, LOL. yates upper back is so smooth.

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37033 on: November 22, 2007, 09:01:02 PM »
Back flat as a board  :(

Team Yates

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37034 on: November 23, 2007, 01:07:19 AM »
Ronnie at 287 has more striations.
Yep.
However, STRIATIONS DO NOT EQUAL CONDITIONING.
See how the lines between muscle groups are blurred on a 287 Ronnie?
Thats called WATER!!!!!
OMG!!!!!
That means he's not as dry, or GASP>... HARD!
Thats why any goddamn bodybuilder will tell you STRIATIONS do not indicate CONDITIONING!
Fuck even Pumpster admits Dorian has the edge in dryness/hardness.
Jesus you stupid fuck.

gonna call u on this 1. dorian never had the striations that ronnie did. that is why u wanna say striations dont equal conditioning, therefore taking out a small chunk of advantage that ronnie has over doz. not smart. but if u still think separation is conditioning, then i got a news flash for u (after which, u will say separation isnt conditioning either... right? ;)) dorian never had the separation in arms or quads that ronnie had. in 1999, his 4 quads were all separated evenly, as were his biceps, brachialis and triceps. so there goes ur water claim and gives ronnie the edge as far as conditioning for those muscles.

but by all means, feel free to post pics from of an out-of-shape ronnie (hell, why not throw in a gut pic?), to try and prove me wrong. i know all the guys tactics in this thread. useless when the evidence will be posted straight after by hulkster or pumpster, respectively.

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37035 on: November 23, 2007, 01:11:43 AM »
his 4 quads were all separated evenly

Sorry, but not all 4 quadriceps femoris muscles are visible, not even at 3% BF  ;)

The vastus intermedius lies underneath the rectus femoris.

Team Yates

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37036 on: November 23, 2007, 01:17:19 AM »
Sorry, but not all 4 quadriceps femoris muscles are visible, not even at 3% BF  ;)

The vastus intermedius lies underneath the rectus femoris.



oops my bad. i keep thinking the rectus femoris is two muscles due to its shape. but the groove in that muscle and the separation between vastus lateralis and vastus medialis are more prominant in ron.

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37037 on: November 23, 2007, 01:21:04 AM »
oops my bad. i keep thinking the rectus femoris is two muscles due to its shape. but the groove in that muscle and the separation between vastus lateralis and vastus medialis are more prominant in ron.

You still don't seem to get the fact why Team Yates' argument is correct.

We are not the ones saying that hardness overrides superior separations. The judges are the ones that determined this. Go back and look at any contest and you will see that the person with the greatest hardness won the show. Separations ARE NOT a universal indicator of condition. Look at Ronnie or Flex in the offseason. Eventhough they were at 12% bodyfat, they still had superior quad separations to Yates. But Yates was at 2% bodyfat and much, much harder  ;)
Team Yates

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37038 on: November 23, 2007, 01:22:19 AM »
I dont care what kind of separations Coleman has, his legs were NEVER this good:

Team Yates

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37039 on: November 23, 2007, 06:02:01 AM »
Back flat as a board  :(


Actually your head's as wooden as a rolling pin if that's your assessment LOL

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37040 on: November 23, 2007, 06:04:14 AM »

We are not the ones saying that hardness overrides superior separations. The judges are the ones that determined this.

And therein lies one of the essential flaws in "team yates'" analysis-naive reliance on the veracity of judging, as if the IFBB is not tied to a highly commercial enterprise with multiple agendas and a slew of questionable decisions dating back to the early 70s if not earlier.

Get with it dude you appear to have been born yesterday.

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37041 on: November 23, 2007, 06:10:20 AM »
And therein lies one of the essential flaws in "team yates'" analysis-naive reliance on the veracity of judging, as if the IFBB is not tied to a highly commercial enterprise with multiple agendas and a slew of questionable decisions dating back to the early 70s if not earlier.

Get with it dude you appear to have been born yesterday.

But it was those same judges that gave Coleman controversial wins over more deserving BB i.e. Cutler, Levrone, Flex, etc.

Team Yates

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37042 on: November 23, 2007, 11:13:45 AM »
Back flat as a board  :(



Sure, and yates has a better mm than Coleman  ::) . Get out of here with that bs pubes. We all know it's you.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37043 on: November 23, 2007, 11:20:41 AM »
But it was those same judges that gave Coleman controversial wins over more deserving BB i.e. Cutler, Levrone, Flex, etc.


I've never denied that, however Coleman over Cutler was closer and thus less of a travesty that several of Yates' wins.

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37044 on: November 23, 2007, 11:42:48 AM »
Any version of Yates would beat Coleman easily. Someone please prove me wrong.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37045 on: November 23, 2007, 11:45:06 AM »
Any version of Yates would beat Coleman easily. Someone please prove me wrong.

LOL epic baseless blather. Go back to page one and starting reading.

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37046 on: November 23, 2007, 11:56:03 AM »
Back flat as a board  :(


thats what i said previously. no one responded.

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37047 on: November 23, 2007, 12:12:48 PM »
LOL epic baseless blather. Go back to page one and starting reading.

Can you prove me wrong though? Put them together onstage at their bests or shut the hell up.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83180
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37048 on: November 23, 2007, 02:54:27 PM »
 ;)

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #37049 on: November 23, 2007, 03:36:29 PM »
And who was it who said that Coleman was more striated than Yates in the upper body??? LOL

The year is 1996 and Yates is clearly putting his fellow competitors to shame: