Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Necrosis]

Deal with the truth, troll..no more running, hiding, excuse after excuse...

ND just keeps posting quotes from peter, but ignores the pictures of dorian being destroyed. ronnie is clearly thicker from the back, his traps look twice the size of dorians. however dorian does have better seperation in his back in the photos, but ronnie is killing him on size there, shape and taper. he is making dorian look like a child in the lower body too, but we already knew that.

[pumpster]

ND just keeps posting quotes from peter, but ignores the pictures of dorian being destroyed. ronnie is clearly thicker from the back, his traps look twice the size of dorians. however dorian does have better seperation in his back in the photos, but ronnie is killing him on size there, shape and taper. he is making dorian look like a child in the lower body too, but we already knew that.

Agreed on all counts including Yates' separation, which i've always said (though Coleman was quite close when leaner).

Some of us live in the world called reality vs. the endless hating, deflections, denials and finger-pointing spewed by this mental patient.

[Necrosis]

his muscles look so much bigger and fuller then dorians is insane. dorian has bigger calves that is obvious.how is it not obvious that ronnies arms and upper legs are much bigger. his chest and delts as well. his back is clearly thicker, just look at his traps in that position, they are monstrous and come high as hell off his clavicle.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND just keeps posting quotes from peter, but ignores the pictures of dorian being destroyed. ronnie is clearly thicker from the back, his traps look twice the size of dorians. however dorian does have better seperation in his back in the photos, but ronnie is killing him on size there, shape and taper. he is making dorian look like a child in the lower body too, but we already knew that.

Again being destroyed according to what? what you like? thats not how contests are judged , contests aren't judged in parts either . and Dorian is being destroyed in pictures to you , you're like them and you just proved it you hyper focus on what you like in a pose ignore the rest and think it favor's Ronnie , again thats not how it works

The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.

these are the rules play by them , and again I supplement my posts with quotes not blanket statements

in any pose Ronnie is down conditioning & density , and muscular balance & proportion , Dorian at 269 pounds vs Ronnie at 257 pounds so muscular bulk favor's Dorian , couple that with Dorian being a better poser and Dorian is the clear winner in ANY pose , sure Ronnie does have advantages in poses but when all the criteria is looked at Dorian meets it better than Ronnie.

[Matt C]

ND had left the boards for some time, possibly due to a meltdown induced by this thread.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND had left the boards for some time, possibly due to a meltdown induced by this thread.

No Matthew that was because of my sister's death and I haven't had a single meltdown on this thread and ironically all of the other participants have.

[Matt C]

No Matthew that was because of my sister's death and I haven't had a single meltdown on this thread and ironically all of the other participants have.

I'm sorry to hear about the death of your (possibly very young) sister.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I'm sorry to hear about the death of your (possibly very young) sister.

Matt that was last March I'm sure you were aware

[Hulkster]

ND just keeps posting quotes from peter, but ignores the pictures of dorian being destroyed

a couple of quotes from peter are all he has left.

nothing else agrees with his stance, particularly the real visual evidence.

[NarcissisticDeity]

a couple of quotes from peter are all he has left.

nothing else agrees with his stance, particularly the real visual evidence.

Hulkster real visual evidence isn't pictures after the fact I hope this helps , its actually being there live and in person and you will NEVER be taken seriously when you tell the people they were there , they are wrong lol

all you have is denial , you're always denying what the experts say thats audacity , thats stupidity

[Matt C]

Matt that was last March I'm sure you were aware

I don't recall you mentioning it on the boards.  I do know you disappeared for quite some time and then came back.

[pumpster]

I don't recall you mentioning it on the boards.  I do know you disappeared for quite some time and then came back.

It was mentioned around xmas. I was one of those offering condolences, for which i was later attacked like a rabid dog. His hatred's really striking.

No Matthew that was because of my sister's death and I haven't had a single meltdown on this thread and ironically all of the other participants have.

Epic denials LOL no meltdowns my ass kid.

[pumpster]

Hulkster real visual evidence isn't pictures after the fact I hope this helps , its actually being there live and in person and you will NEVER be taken seriously when you tell the people they were there , they are wrong lol

all you have is denial , you're always denying what the experts say thats audacity , thats stupidity

Total denial. The defense when all excuses are exhausted: "I don't agree in the face of overwhelming evidence, therefore it's untrue." LOL

[NarcissisticDeity]

It was mentioned around xmas. I was one of those offering condolences, for which i was later attacked like a rabid dog. His hatred's really striking.


Epic denials LOL no meltdowns my ass kid.

condolences ? and meltdown lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

Total denial. The defense when all excuses are exhausted: "I don't agree in the face of overwhelming evidence, therefore it's untrue." LOL

See you'll never commit to any rational debate out of fear , all you're forced to do is leave little remarks because you have no rebuttal

again what overwhelming evidence? I've posted at least 4 quotes specific to the argument that Dorian was better conditioned than Ronnie and I've posted pics and an explanation why , my case is proven.

what are you left with? you're left with denial and contradiction , seriously Hulkster is telling people who were actually live and in person that they don't know what they're talking about thats denial anyone who thinks their opinion will trump that of credible eyewitnesses is in denial period.

[Hulkster]

seriously Hulkster is telling people who were actually live and in person that they don't know what they're talking about thats denial anyone who thinks their opinion will trump that of credible eyewitnesses are in denial period.

yes, because so many people have seen 93 contest dorian stand next to 99 contest Ronnie and pose..

 

the pics are the closest thing we have, and OF COURSE you are going to say that they don't matter:

because dorian gets killed in almost all of them..

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

yes, because so many people have seen 93 contest dorian stand next to 99 contest Ronnie and pose..

 

the pics are the closest thing we have, and OF COURSE you are going to say that they don't matter:

because dorian gets killed in almost all of them..

 

Peter McGough was at the 1993 Mr Olympia and he was at the 1999 Mr Olympia and he has gone on record as saying Ronnie was never as hard or as dry as Dorian Yates , for you to claim this man is wrong is the height of stupidity

Ronnie Coleman has said his best Olympia appearance was the 1998 Mr Olympia because his conditioning was ' spot-on ' for you to claim this man is wrong is the height of stupidity

you're always contradicting professionals and eyewitnesses , constantly. A smart man would say " hey may Ronnie wasn't as hard or dry in 99 as 98 , I wasn't there and a few people who were there are compelled to mention this , specifically the man in question , maybe I'm wrong on this one " but they again you're not smart are you? 

You weren't there thats the bottom line and you're telling people who were there they are wrong because you looked at pictures at home on your pc lol thats amazingly moronic , especially considered two contest photographers , a professional bodybuilder and an editor of the largest bodybuilding publication state specifically pictures aren't accurate and NOTHING replaced actually being there at the show , live and in person . a smart man would say " well I wasn't there and these guys were and pictures are just a sort glimpse into a multi-hour event , and are not accurate , and my opinion contradicts theres maybe they're right and I'm wrong . " but then again you're not smart are you? 

the bottom line is you're a fucking idiot , you played yourself the moment you claimed everyone else is wrong and you're right despite NEVER once attending any show in question or any show in general , Hulkster you're beyond rational discussion and being taken seriously you've melted down into a nutt-hugging troll who can't look beyond his own ignorance and stupidity , you're so deathly afraid to admit you're wrong because that means I would be right you just keep on denying , but allow me to spare you , you are wrong and I am right don't fear looking stupid because you've told an army of eyewitnesses they're all wrong and you're right , it doesn't get anymore dense than that.

[Hulkster]

Peter McGough was at the 1993 Mr Olympia and he was at the 1999 Mr Olympia and he has gone on record as saying Ronnie was never as hard or as dry as Dorian Yates , for you to claim this man is wrong is the height of stupidity

and for you to claim he is right in the face of 1500 pages of contradictory visual evidence is okay?

what the fuck?

 

[Necrosis]

Peter McGough was at the 1993 Mr Olympia and he was at the 1999 Mr Olympia and he has gone on record as saying Ronnie was never as hard or as dry as Dorian Yates , for you to claim this man is wrong is the height of stupidity

Ronnie Coleman has said his best Olympia appearance was the 1998 Mr Olympia because his conditioning was ' spot-on ' for you to claim this man is wrong is the height of stupidity

you're always contradicting professionals and eyewitnesses , constantly. A smart man would say " hey may Ronnie wasn't as hard or dry in 99 as 98 , I wasn't there and a few people who were there are compelled to mention this , specifically the man in question , maybe I'm wrong on this one " but they again you're not smart are you? 

You weren't there thats the bottom line and you're telling people who were there they are wrong because you looked at pictures at home on your pc lol thats amazingly moronic , especially considered two contest photographers , a professional bodybuilder and an editor of the largest bodybuilding publication state specifically pictures aren't accurate and NOTHING replaced actually being there at the show , live and in person . a smart man would say " well I wasn't there and these guys were and pictures are just a sort glimpse into a multi-hour event , and are not accurate , and my opinion contradicts theres maybe they're right and I'm wrong . " but then again you're not smart are you? 

the bottom line is you're a fucking idiot , you played yourself the moment you claimed everyone else is wrong and you're right despite NEVER once attending any show in question or any show in general , Hulkster you're beyond rational discussion and being taken seriously you've melted down into a nutt-hugging troll who can't look beyond his own ignorance and stupidity , you're so deathly afraid to admit you're wrong because that means I would be right you just keep on denying , but allow me to spare you , you are wrong and I am right don't fear looking stupid because you've told an army of eyewitnesses they're all wrong and you're right , it doesn't get anymore dense than that.

hardness and dryness for one are only part of the equation, dorian was never as striated, cut or seperate as ronnie, nor a vascular. ronnie has better condiionting by far.

[Hulkster]

hardness and dryness for one are only part of the equation, dorian was never as striated, cut or seperate as ronnie, nor a vascular. ronnie has better condiionting by far.

exactly.

cue irrelevant ND Peter quote. LOL 

[NarcissisticDeity]

hardness and dryness for one are only part of the equation, dorian was never as striated, cut or seperate as ronnie, nor a vascular. ronnie has better condiionting by far.

again another blanket statement with no explanation or supplemented quotes . you type empty words .

[NarcissisticDeity]

and for you to claim he is right in the face of 1500 pages of contradictory visual evidence is okay?

what the fuck?

 

More than one person say Dorian is the better conditioned of the two NO just McGough and ALL were in person were you? 

[Hulkster]

again another blanket statement with no explanation or supplemented quotes . you type empty words .

 


look ND:

this is all the explanation you need, idiot.

[pumpster]

again another blanket statement with no explanation or supplemented quotes . you type empty words .

Nothing emptier than some clown furiously churning out rhetoric from a basement, proving precisely nothing.

According to this genius, rebuttal is complete through denial LOL

Part of an avalanche of proof..

[NarcissisticDeity]

look ND:

this is all the explanation you need, idiot.

You think two differing quality pictures of a single pose prove ANYTHING? keep trying moron