Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3513543 times)

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40075 on: January 30, 2008, 12:39:30 PM »
Who was the bright spark that accused Yates of having unsymetrical traps a few hundred pages ago? LOL



That's the best criticism you can come up with?!?!  lol, in a shot where coleman's whole right side is slightly closer than his left due to slight twistage in this pose in this picture, Dorian's whole back is pretty lop-sided in many shots,.and as for taking drugs to become Mr O?  apparently Dorian may have taken drugs too, have you heard about this?

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40076 on: January 30, 2008, 12:46:02 PM »
269 pounds untouchable by Coleman any year !


Quads man! Can no one else see where his quads aren't?! Great calves no doubt, and you can discuss the separation of his vastus medialis, sartorius etc, but the fact remains by today's standards, these quads are plain too small for his upper body. Quads are more important than calves too since they're the biggest muscle in the body!

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40077 on: January 30, 2008, 12:48:02 PM »
Hey Neo, you doing Mr Getbig III?

Bring it on son ;D

hell yeah, I'm competing in the Mr. Getbig III. I also plan on doing the Southeastern USA (level V). I've been working real hard on bringing up my weaknesses. Here is a recent pic of me. You know how the wheels look. :)


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40078 on: January 30, 2008, 01:05:05 PM »
yawn ::)

learn to read, dipshit. My comment about backing up my claim was in reference to having better reading comprehension than you. It's obvious to everyone who reads this thread that yours sucks. You just proved it again by thinking I was talking about the quotes backing me up.

I posted quotes saying 03 was Ronnie's prime. You posted quotes saying 98 and the 01 ASC were both Ronnie's prime. Hulkster posted quotes saying 99 was Ronnie's prime. There's no definitive year for when Ronnie achieved his best physique.

ha ha ha ha ha

learn to read, you dumbass. I never said Dorian was better in 92 than 95.

Quote
yawn ::)

yeah I thought so

Quote
learn to read, dipshit. My comment about backing up my claim was in reference to having better reading comprehension than you. It's obvious to everyone who reads this thread that yours sucks. You just proved it again by thinking I was talking about the quotes backing me up

projection look up the word and you're soundling like Hulkster now ' everyone ' seriously give it a rest

Quote
I posted quotes saying 03 was Ronnie's prime. You posted quotes saying 98 and the 01 ASC were both Ronnie's prime. Hulkster posted quotes saying 99 was Ronnie's prime. There's no definitive year for when Ronnie achieved his best physique.

No you didn't , no where in those quotes does it say 2003 Olympia is his prime thats you bending it to fit what you think , and no 99 wasn't his prime either because in the quote it says specifically he looked better in 2001 , no there is a definitive year in which he reached his best physique its in those quotes you leep posting from Peter McGough  ;) oh they don't count anymore Mr Hypocrite

and I told you exactly why he's better in 2001 proportion/density/dryness  ;)

Quote
ha ha ha ha ha

yeah I thought so

Quote
learn to read, you dumbass. I never said Dorian was better in 92 than 95.

yeah you did ' Dorian's proportions, definition, symmetry, and overall appearance were better ' you absolutely committed to the statement his definition , symmetry and overall appearance were all ' better ' in 1992 compared to 93/95 on top of being flat out wrong you did make the statement

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40079 on: January 30, 2008, 01:06:28 PM »


Quads man! Can no one else see where his quads aren't?! Great calves no doubt, and you can discuss the separation of his vastus medialis, sartorius etc, but the fact remains by today's standards, these quads are plain too small for his upper body. Quads are more important than calves too since they're the biggest muscle in the body!

Actually the glutes are the biggest muscle in the body and we know the Coleman fans know about that. LOL

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40080 on: January 30, 2008, 01:09:34 PM »


Quads man! Can no one else see where his quads aren't?! Great calves no doubt, and you can discuss the separation of his vastus medialis, sartorius etc, but the fact remains by today's standards, these quads are plain too small for his upper body. Quads are more important than calves too since they're the biggest muscle in the body!

Do when did you and the rest of camp Coleman get together and decide quads are more important than calves? lol I laughed out loud when I read this comment no all muscles are equal in making the most effective mandatory pose and just in this shot alone despite Ronnie's advantage in having a smaller waist & hips , a better taper , and ' quds ' he can't touch this pose compared to Dorian he just can't .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40081 on: January 30, 2008, 01:15:15 PM »
better to have them on the neck, which isn't judged, instead of the back, which is judged. ;)


Wrong again Neo , the neck is judged you'd know this if you knew the first thing about competitive bodybuilding  ;) I'll continue to teach , you continue to learn.



When assessing a competitor’s physique, a judge should follow a
routine procedure which will allow a comprehensive assessment of
the physique as a whole. During the comparisons of the
compulsory poses, the judge should first look at the primary
muscle group being displayed. The judge should then survey the
whole physique, starting from the head, and looking at every part
of the physique in a downward sequence, beginning with general
impressions, and looking for muscular bulk, balanced
development, muscular density and definition. The downward
survey should take in the head, neck, shoulders, chest, all of the
arm muscles, front of the trunk for pectorals, pec-delt tie-in,
abdominals, waist, thighs, legs, calves and feet. The same
procedure for back poses will also take in the upper and lower
trapezius, teres and infraspinatus, erector spinae, the gluteus
group, the leg biceps group at the back of the thighs, calves, and
feet. A detailed assessment of the various muscle groups should
be made during the comparisons, at which time it helps the judge
to compare muscle shape, density, and definition while still
bearing in mind the competitor’s overall balanced development.
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40082 on: January 30, 2008, 01:30:20 PM »
Wrong again Neo , the neck is judged you'd know this if you knew the first thing about competitive bodybuilding  ;) I'll continue to teach , you continue to learn.



When assessing a competitor’s physique, a judge should follow a
routine procedure which will allow a comprehensive assessment of
the physique as a whole. During the comparisons of the
compulsory poses, the judge should first look at the primary
muscle group being displayed. The judge should then survey the
whole physique, starting from the head, and looking at every part
of the physique in a downward sequence, beginning with general
impressions, and looking for muscular bulk, balanced
development, muscular density and definition. The downward
survey should take in the head, neck, shoulders, chest, all of the
arm muscles, front of the trunk for pectorals, pec-delt tie-in,
abdominals, waist, thighs, legs, calves and feet. The same
procedure for back poses will also take in the upper and lower
trapezius, teres and infraspinatus, erector spinae, the gluteus
group, the leg biceps group at the back of the thighs, calves, and
feet. A detailed assessment of the various muscle groups should
be made during the comparisons, at which time it helps the judge
to compare muscle shape, density, and definition while still
bearing in mind the competitor’s overall balanced development.
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.

Damn ronnie's un-striated neck, he got marked down for that shit, you know it, lol, no but he did hough, no really

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40083 on: January 30, 2008, 01:32:34 PM »
Damn ronnie's un-striated neck, he got marked down for that shit, you know it, lol, no but he did hough, no really

No one is talking about striations , he made the ignorant claim the neck isn't judged and it is . he's wrong as usual

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40084 on: January 30, 2008, 01:37:48 PM »
I found something of value that NarcissisticDeity posted on the board!!

Bodybuilding Pro.com

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40085 on: January 30, 2008, 01:50:27 PM »
Do when did you and the rest of camp Coleman get together and decide quads are more important than calves? lol I laughed out loud when I read this comment no all muscles are equal in making the most effective mandatory pose and just in this shot alone despite Ronnie's advantage in having a smaller waist & hips , a better taper , and ' quds ' he can't touch this pose compared to Dorian he just can't .

I reckon they're pretty close in that one, Ronnie's calves aren't bad at all in that shot you posted, and although the rules of symmetry dictate that all muscles are equal, in reality the quads occupy much more of your vision and make up much more of the body than calves, although I don't totally disagree with you I still think this contributes to make quads matter a little more in the eyes of judges, simply because they make up more than two thirds of the leg.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40086 on: January 30, 2008, 01:53:01 PM »
I reckon they're pretty close in that one, Ronnie's calves aren't bad at all in that shot you posted, and although the rules of symmetry dictate that all muscles are equal, in reality the quads occupy much more of your vision and make up much more of the body than calves, although I don't totally disagree with you I still think this contributes to make quads matter a little more in the eyes of judges, simply because they make up more than two thirds of the leg.

the sad part is it's not even a tad close in the shot I posted , Dorian is textbook front latspread and Ronnie isn't for many reasons

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40087 on: January 30, 2008, 01:57:31 PM »


Quads man! Can no one else see where his quads aren't?! Great calves no doubt, and you can discuss the separation of his vastus medialis, sartorius etc, but the fact remains by today's standards, these quads are plain too small for his upper body. Quads are more important than calves too since they're the biggest muscle in the body!

dorian's quads ( actually along with his arms, pecs, glutes, hams, taper, delts, symmetry lol)

are absolute garbage compared to Ronnie's even when comparing their respective 93 and 99 wins, when both were arguably in their best shapes ever:
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40088 on: January 30, 2008, 02:00:12 PM »
honestly, even at dorians "precontest best lol ::)" Ronnie's quads just KILL his:

in either contest shape or precontest:
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40089 on: January 30, 2008, 02:01:03 PM »
dorian's quads ( actually along with his arms, pecs, glutes, hams, taper, delts, symmetry lol)

are absolute garbage compared to Ronnie's even when comparing their respective 93 and 99 wins, when both were arguably in their best shapes ever:

And entertaining your complete nonsense despite all that Ronnie admits he couldn't beat Dorian and this was right before the 99 Olympia lmfao and he was talking about the torn/quad/triicep/bicep Yates and NOT the injury free one , just imagine then what 1993 would do to 1999  ;)

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40090 on: January 30, 2008, 02:01:25 PM »
honestly, even at dorians "precontest best lol ::)" Ronnie's quads just KILL his:

in either contest shape or precontest:
Since you're such an advocate of "shapely" muscles, care to discuss why Ronnie's quads look like fucked up turnips?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40091 on: January 30, 2008, 02:02:46 PM »
honestly, even at dorians "precontest best lol ::)" Ronnie's quads just KILL his:

in either contest shape or precontest:

Ronnie does have better sweep and separation of the rectus femoris however thats all moot , his legs as a whole are compromised bu the weakest calves of any Mr Olympia and piss-poor proportion . keep trying to rack up parts Hulktser

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40092 on: January 30, 2008, 02:03:20 PM »
Since you're such an advocate of "shapely" muscles, care to discuss why Ronnie's quads look like fucked up turnips?

its called quad sweep.

and the judges and most fans certainly do NOT think they look like turnips.

they think they look amazing.

its only the three nuthuggers on this thread that think that.

just so you know.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40093 on: January 30, 2008, 02:03:40 PM »
Since you're such an advocate of "shapely" muscles, care to discuss why Ronnie's quads look like fucked up turnips?

You're talking to the moron who claimed Ronnie had better quads than Platz he doesn't see any flaws what so ever

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40094 on: January 30, 2008, 02:04:18 PM »
its called quad sweep.

and the judges and most fans certainly do NOT think they look like turnips.

they think they look amazing.

its only the three nuthuggers on this thread that think that.

just so you know.

lmfao its called quad sweep? this one is a keeper lol

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40095 on: January 30, 2008, 02:17:13 PM »
its called quad sweep.

and the judges and most fans certainly do NOT think they look like turnips.

they think they look amazing.

its only the three nuthuggers on this thread that think that.

just so you know.

11% Coleman worst Mr. Olympia ever, Yates 1%....explain that hahahahaha
Team Yates

aussiepro

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 797
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40096 on: January 30, 2008, 02:32:34 PM »
someone please delete this thread, its been going on way to long...
btw dorian wins
there's no magic pills... just needles

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40097 on: January 30, 2008, 02:33:24 PM »
someone please delete this thread, its been going on way to long...
btw dorian wins

Great post and they can delete it now , Hulkster lost his own hero concedes defeat to Dorian !

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40098 on: January 30, 2008, 02:39:57 PM »
my name is NarcissisticDeity and I'm a retard

yeah, I thougth so.

Quote
projection look up the word and you're soundling like Hulkster now ' everyone ' seriously give it a rest

I'm not projecting anything if what I say is correct, which it is.

Quote
No you didn't , no where in those quotes does it say 2003 Olympia is his prime thats you bending it to fit what you think , and no 99 wasn't his prime either because in the quote it says specifically he looked better in 2001 , no there is a definitive year in which he reached his best physique its in those quotes you leep posting from Peter McGough oh they don't count anymore Mr Hypocrite

yes, I did.

Quote
yeah you did ' Dorian's proportions, definition, symmetry, and overall appearance were better' you absolutely committed to the statement his definition , symmetry and overall appearance were all ' better ' in 1992 compared to 93/95 on top of being flat out wrong you did make the statement

show me where I explicitly said Dorian was better overall in 92 than in 95. ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83617
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #40099 on: January 30, 2008, 02:45:00 PM »
yeah, I thougth so.

I'm not projection anything if what I say is correct, which it is.

yes, I did.

show me where I explicitly said Dorian was better overall in 92 than in 95. ;)

Quote
yeah, I thougth so.

Quote
yes, I did.

I'm sure you believe this


shows what you're working with


Quote
I'm not projection anything if what I say is correct, which it is.

yeah just like your ' correct ' that 03 is Ronnie's prime and they don't judge the neck , you're not correct on much

Quote
show me where I explicitly said Dorian was better overall in 92 than in 95. ;)

I did in bold  ;)

you're on Hulkster's level of childish behavior and its out of frustration , but hey its all good its the only thing you have left.