Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3551676 times)

delta9mda · « **Reply #42975 on:** March 24, 2010, 03:13:04 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 24, 2010, 02:16:09 PM

epic not understanding that seeing a pro up close and personal at a seminar is a lot better than seeing a pro from the 45th row sitting behind some tall guy..

i raise you one, when you go to pro shows and seminars and train at the same gyms as pros and have friends that are pros, let me know. thank you.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #42976 on:** March 24, 2010, 03:19:58 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on March 24, 2010, 03:13:04 PM

i raise you one, when you go to pro shows and seminars and train at the same gyms as pros and have friends that are pros, let me know. thank you.

who are your pro friends delta ?

Hulkster · « **Reply #42977 on:** March 24, 2010, 03:32:02 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on March 24, 2010, 03:13:04 PM

i raise you one, when you go to pro shows and seminars and train at the same gyms as pros and have friends that are pros, let me know. thank you.

thats fine.

but how is the fact that you know pros and have been to pro shows change the fact that the visuals clearly show that Ronnie 99 was a good deal better than anything dorian ever presented?

after all, why else do you think the nuthuggers have been claiming its all been enhanced for the last two years LOL?

you people are trying to use things that have asolutely NOTHING to do with the topic at hand, in a desperate effort to gain ground in a losing argument.

it isn't working.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #42978 on:** March 24, 2010, 03:45:09 PM »

Jesus Fucking Christ... 4 goddam years and this stupid thread is still going.

That's 4 years that a bunch of you guys have wasted responding to this thread every day.

You've all owned yourself into eternity.

Hulkster · « **Reply #42979 on:** March 24, 2010, 04:31:26 PM »

so in other words, you think ronnie is better. I thought so.

beefcakeblake · « **Reply #42980 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:04:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 24, 2010, 03:32:02 PM

thats fine.

but how is the fact that you know pros and have been to pro shows change the fact that the visuals clearly show that Ronnie 99 was a good deal better than anything dorian ever presented?

after all, why else do you think the nuthuggers have been claiming its all been enhanced for the last two years LOL?

you people are trying to use things that have asolutely NOTHING to do with the topic at hand, in a desperate effort to gain ground in a losing argument.

it isn't working.

ok everybody looked really good at the 1999 mr o, even markus ruhl that was in 10th, because of lighting not because it was the best year.

beefcakeblake · « **Reply #42981 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:15:37 PM »

Quote from: Royal Lion on March 24, 2010, 10:55:01 AM

Ronnie had a great RDB; however, Dorian's was the best ever imo....Ronnie a close 2nd. Doz's back was harder and more conditioned than Ronnie's.

I agree as well dorians back was always more detailed then ronnies, and wider in this pose

ronnies back in this pose always looks narrow but has good thickness.

beefcakeblake · « **Reply #42982 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:16:51 PM »

Quote from: JP_RC on March 24, 2010, 11:27:26 AM

Nice pictures.....just look at the comparison videos and see Ronnie in 1999, then look at any Dorian.

ok all i see is dorian owning ronnie with superier muscle density and better head to toe conditioning.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #42983 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:17:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 24, 2010, 03:32:02 PM

thats fine.

but how is the fact that you know pros and have been to pro shows change the fact that the visuals clearly show that Ronnie 99 was a good deal better than anything dorian ever presented?

Yes Hulkster, we should all believe your carefully selected comparison pics over someone who saw both Dorian and Ronnie IN PERSON.

BTW...epic hypocrisy on your part as you bawled and bawled that this shot was shopped when the photographer himself stated it wasn't. Lol, Dorian owns your mind.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #42984 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:21:45 PM »

Quote from: beefcakeblake on March 24, 2010, 08:15:37 PM

I agree as well dorians back was always more detailed then ronnies, and wider in this pose

ronnies back in this pose always looks narrow but has good thickness.

Yep, Dorian wins in those comparisons, and that is Ronnie in 98 and 01, his driest years. Here they are again...

beefcakeblake · « **Reply #42985 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:24:43 PM »

Quote from: Royal Lion on March 24, 2010, 08:21:45 PM

Yep, Dorian wins in those comparisons, and that is Ronnie in 98 and 01, his driest years. Here they are again...

although ronnie looks really good in this pic if your just looking at back its no contest with this

Royal Lion · « **Reply #42986 on:** March 24, 2010, 08:28:25 PM »

They both look fantastic. IMO Dorian has the edge in back completeness, conditioning, and detail.

JP_RC · « **Reply #42987 on:** March 25, 2010, 06:07:21 AM »

Quote from: beefcakeblake on March 24, 2010, 08:16:51 PM

ok all i see is dorian owning ronnie with superier muscle density and better head to toe conditioning.

Dorian had slightly better density, but not better conditioning than Ronnie in 1999. Still, his density is not enough to give him an edge over Ronnie. Ronnie was just amazing in 1999, Dorian with his flaws could not touch him.

I'm not even a big Ronnie fan or anything like that, I much prefer physiques like Shawn Ray, Flex Wheeler, Priest, Haney, Dexter, etc.
But I call it like I see it, in 1999 Ronnie was unbeatable. He hasn't been surpassed, not even until this day.
No one can touch Ronnie in 1999, not Dorian, not Cutler, not Kai, not Nasser, nobody.

Dorian must be your favorite (again judging from your avatar), that's the reason you can't see that Ronnie in 1999 would be too much for him.

JP_RC · « **Reply #42988 on:** March 25, 2010, 06:12:10 AM »

Quote from: beefcakeblake on March 24, 2010, 08:15:37 PM

I agree as well dorians back was always more detailed then ronnies, and wider in this pose

ronnies back in this pose always looks narrow but has good thickness.

How can Ronnie's back look narrow or Dorian's be wider when Ronnie has a much better taper?

I don't know what you guys see.

JP_RC · « **Reply #42989 on:** March 25, 2010, 06:17:57 AM »

Again, pictures are nice. But video comparisons are better. All I see is Dorian's back being drier.

Anyway, Hulkster or anybody else could post up two pics of Ronnie beating Dorian in any other pose or even in the BDB.
But pics only take you so much as far as comparisions. Hence the reason for the videos.

beefcakeblake · « **Reply #42990 on:** March 25, 2010, 07:35:32 AM »

Quote from: JP_RC on March 25, 2010, 06:12:10 AM

How can Ronnie's back look narrow or Dorian's be wider when Ronnie has a much better taper?

I don't know what you guys see.

I think his natural structure of his body( esp wide hips) makes his back look narrow.

delta9mda · « **Reply #42991 on:** March 25, 2010, 11:44:16 AM »

Quote from: beefcakeblake on March 25, 2010, 07:35:32 AM

I think his natural structure of his body( esp wide hips) makes his back look narrow.

this is 96 Yates owning hulksters best ever asc ronnie.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #42992 on:** March 25, 2010, 12:33:14 PM »

Quote from: beefcakeblake on March 24, 2010, 08:24:43 PM

although ronnie looks really good in this pic if your just looking at back its no contest with this

sorry but Ronnie's back at the 01 ASC has more to offer than Dorian's. Ronnie has width, taper, detail, and more thickness in the rear double biceps.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #42993 on:** March 25, 2010, 12:38:45 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on March 25, 2010, 11:44:16 AM

this is 96 Yates owning hulksters best ever asc ronnie.

why are you using morphed pics?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #42994 on:** March 25, 2010, 12:40:27 PM »

will the real Dorian please stand up? $:-\$

JP_RC · « **Reply #42995 on:** March 25, 2010, 12:47:37 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on March 25, 2010, 12:33:14 PM

sorry but Ronnie's back at the 01 ASC has more to offer than Dorian's. Ronnie has width, taper, detail, and more thickness in the rear double biceps.

And the 1999 Ronnie has even more to offer than any Dorian. All those things you listed: width, taper, detail, and thickness is what makes Ronnie's back better. I don't why these guys can't see it.

JP_RC · « **Reply #42996 on:** March 25, 2010, 12:51:32 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on March 25, 2010, 11:44:16 AM

this is 96 Yates owning hulksters best ever asc ronnie.

Again, nice pics from 1996 of Dorian. Here are two videos for a better comparison:

JP_RC · « **Reply #42997 on:** March 25, 2010, 12:55:11 PM »

Ronnie 1999>Dorian 1996

I can't believe he was using morphed pics by the way, and they were complaining of the 1999 video being fake?

delta9mda · « **Reply #42998 on:** March 25, 2010, 01:09:26 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on March 25, 2010, 12:38:45 PM

why are you using morphed pics?

nothing is morphed i have never gone down that hulkster road. they are screen caps, that is all.

delta9mda · « **Reply #42999 on:** March 25, 2010, 01:12:18 PM »

Quote from: JP_RC on March 25, 2010, 12:55:11 PM

Ronnie 1999>Dorian 1996

I can't believe he was using morphed pics by the way, and they were complaining of the 1999 video being fake?

until someone post up the german gran prix 1996 (or i do) then it is what it is.

i have never used any morphed pics and have told other Yates fans do not do and have called people on it. i say 96 german gp as i think that is/ was Yates best ever.

i dont feel like chopping it up and posing it now.