Let me get this straight: After years of exchanging mutual taunts and threats, you voluntarily participate in arranging a mutual combat situation over the internet with a person you believe is mentally ill who lives thousands of miles away in another country, provide them your specific locations at specifics times, negotiate time and place, type of footwear, length of rounds, use of gloves, etc., then exchange taunts and threats with them for days saying they won't show up, winding them up, accepting then backing out, but still maintaining you aren't backing out, until the threats you have caused to be escalated eventually cross the line into mentioning people whose information you have repeatedly provided publicly in the forum frequented by this person you claim is a danger, and then ignore the multiple disavowals by them after, do not disengage or withdraw, but continue to taunt and exchange threats with them over the internet?
And then after you've voluntarily and repeatedly chosen to continue to visit that forum and continually re-engage and escalate in mutual taunts and threats, you report only the isolated comments by this person about the people whose information you've provided, to authorities and do so in an email that you admit you know may not even be read or acted upon, ignoring all context and contribution by you, and maintain that the isolated comments with all this context of mutuality can reasonably be considered a threat?
Do you own a mirror sir?