Since VP Kamala Harris was not elected, why waste time discussing something that didn't and may never happen? It seems futile to me. This also explains why others, including me, aren't spending time questioning it.
I am more interested in what might happen with the mid-term elections. Will voters continue to support the Musk/Trump administration by voting for Republican candidates for the House and Senate or will there be a tidal wave of Democrats elected to these positions. If so, this could stop the current administration’s agenda in its tracks.
Because she's being mentioned as a better alternative. So much so, that agnostic said he doesn't even have to explain why. So let's see.
I think it's pretty obvious what will happen at the midterms. If the economy improves, the right will maintain control, and will stay the course, and win the next two elections after. If it does not, they could lose the House and Sentate, then nothing will pass, and the left will repeat the same mistakes they did last time.
One thing the left has NOT done (outside of maybe folks like Fetterman and Torres), is doing an introspective and trying to figure out why they lost. There are doubling down on divisiveness and attacks, the same as last time. No real leaders are emerging, and it's the same clowns continuing to act like the clowns that they are.
