That doesnt matter Joe. Ever get pissed off when you talk to some professional who uses parlance / terms that only the most elite specialist in that field can comprehend? The whole point of communication is to get a point across to the other party and this is achieved most efficiently by using the simplest, most economical language possible. If Julian was writing for some magazine targeting advanced english speaking puritans or something, it would be acceptable. Instead, he does that in FLEX
And its ok for him to do that once in a while. But he uses that kind of language everywhere !
If he's got such an impressive vocabulary - good for him. But stop with this pathetic attempt at impressing people please.
I spoke with Julian about this at supper at the Arnold one year- about using words most people (including me) would have to look up.
What most of us cannot grasp, I guess, is that Julian is not trying to impress, pathetically or otherwise, people who read his work. He is what he is. Some will say he does not communicate, and I cannot argue that has an element of truth.
But I am just stubborn enough to get out my dictionary, look up the words, and memorize the ones I find useful.
I admit I am biased. I like Julian and find him to be a fascinating person.
"But he uses that kind of language everywhere." No, he does not use it in speech with regular folk. Why? Beats me, but I suspect because most people don't have a dictionary at hand, and for him to use words in conversation which the other person would not know how to spell (and thus look up) would be rude and condescending. In print, there's the word, there's the spelling. Check it.
On the news today was word that many American high school students could not locate Louisiana on a map of the USA. Those kids could, I suppose, say that it is condescending to refer to places they do not know.
Or they could look it up.