Jesus y’all still mad I proved everything I said and then some and still you guys want to argue about the army and try to call me a liar Jesus Christ who fucking cares. It was over 20 years ago today. I went for a bike ride with my kid then we lifted weights then we went on a hike with the cub scouts. Meanwhile you guys are still arguing still mad about why you think I did or didn’t do god knows what 20 years ago.
Did you fuckers even lift today?
I have pics of me in uniform. I have posted them previously as well as a military ID, my dd214, and my Meps paperwork for fuck sake yet you guys still want to question if I was in the Army.
MY WIFE IS THE ONE WHO SUGGESTED I ASK MY EX TO PICK ME UP. I AM NOT A CHEAT ASSHOLE. MORON JEFF IS GOING TO TELL MY WIFE ON FACEBOOK FUCKING LOSER IT WAS HER IDEA. YOU FUCKING MORONS THINK YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT ME THAN MY WIFE
I actually need a ride from surgery to my hotel. It is like 3 blocks from the hospital, but they require you to have someone sign you out or you have to hire a nurse for 24 hours to stay overnight with you as well. If coach is available I will forgive his previous transgressions for a ride from the hospital to the hotel. 2nd week of Nov, I have an ex girlfriend out there willing to do it but I dont think the wife would like that
Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and some slob named Chaos,
Let’s revisit the key behaviors that demonstrate a concerning pattern in Brian’s actions. First, we have the conflicting statements about his wife’s involvement in contacting his ex-girlfriend—initially, he claimed his wife wouldn’t like it, only to say the next day that it was her idea all along. This inconsistency raises doubts about his credibility.
But beyond that, consider Brian’s refusal to answer important questions about hauling a mortar up a mountain—an event that holds significant relevance to this case. Instead of addressing it directly, Brian deflects by claiming that "we’re arguing about things that happened 20 years ago." Why avoid discussing such a key moment, unless there’s something he doesn’t want revealed? His refusal to engage with the truth is another example of him trying to control the narrative to suit his purposes.
And then there’s his pattern of posting pictures of his son online, despite knowing that there are people who will say negative things about the boy. This behavior, too, raises serious questions. Why would someone expose their child to predictable negativity? It appears that Brian, once again, invites conflict or attention—whether it be positive or negative—at the expense of others, including his own family.
When we put all of this together—his shifting story about his wife, his evasion of questions about the mortar incident, and his ongoing decision to post pictures of his son despite the hurtful comments—it paints a picture of someone who is more concerned with attracting attention than telling the truth or protecting those around him. Whether it's through inconsistency, deflection, or stirring up controversy, Brian’s actions consistently point to a desire for attention, no matter the cost.
I ask you to carefully consider this pattern of behavior and the impact it has on his credibility on anything he says in the future.
