Here is a list of vaccines given in 1986 versus 2019.
You are saying you agree with this large increase?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/known-culprits/vaccines-culprit/cdc-recommended-vaccine-schedule-1986-vs-2019/
Hey man, I've said again and again that I don't know about vaccines, I haven't studied it in depth and I couldn't understand it even if I tried; I don't have any education. If a doctor says I need heart surgery I might consult a few but I wouldn't ask my friend who might be a construction worker what he thought, I would have to trust the cardiologists to a certain extent. I have no way of knowing how many vaccines are good and how many are excessive. So my question to you is, if you were POTUS and you had to be the one who decides vaccine policy, how would you go about it, how would you decide which vaccines to keep and which to discard. I didn't take the covid shot, my doc said I didn't need it due to now robudt natural immunity but he recommended two others, a seasonal flu shot and a pneumonia specific shot. I didn't research them, I crossed my fingers and did what the doc said. So I generally wonder how say Trump educates himself on issues before making decisions. If ut were me I'd invite generally recognised experts from "opposite" sides of a contentious issue to get a feel for the thing. I don't know what Trump or Biden does, if Trump asks Kushner or someone else in their inner circle, first or if he asks some donors, or if he goes the "expert" route. So this fella RFK seems like a generally swell fella but does he have the expertise to make big health policy decisions?
Like always, this isn't a combative post, just asking questions because I'm interested in how people think.Since I know a
little about nutrition I know what a clusterfuck diet is to people, lots of self styled experts, hucksters, some perhaps legitimate experts, all have their own ideas on how people should eat, or sometimes even forced to eat. I know many people feel the FDA was always in the hands of corporations that pushed knowingly dangerous food policies on people for profit. I accept that that happens but at the same time at times the recs have been pretty logical and probably based on the best research available up to that point. Doesn't mean they can't be wrong, either wilfully or simply mistaken. I think "they" know recommend few processed foods, limit sugar especially from soft drinks, eat 5 servings of fruit and vegetables a day (this I have a problem with, how many can do this, the poorer can't even afford it), limit red meat and eat more fish. Exercise every day for 30 minutes, don't drink alcohol. Doesn't sound sinister to me although some would say vegetables poison us and we should only eat meat and animal fats. Carbs are just evil period. I know the red meat recs are probably politicised and not entirely based on research but on "climate" change or potetial future food shortages, so that should be considered. Hey, there's a debate to be had here obviously and we are not yet at the finish line of having figured diet out.
TL/DR: I am curious of how you would handle things if in a position to do so, what would be your policy, how many vaccines. 
