Yes!!! Trump declassifies the Epstein files - 01-23-25

[Irongrip400]

same as trumtards , struggling financially ,  but they have more peace in heart , intelligence , compassion , humanity and faith that truth prevails.

being financially well off  is aim of most trumptards since they lack qualities  i mentioned above and they are mostly hollow ....,  so they are suffering mentally more , even more after their pedo daddy became naked in front of everyone.

even if trump spit on faces of his supporters ..they will say its ok it will make america great again. they are that much thick mentally.

Neither side of the isle, if extreme to one side or another,  has peace in their hearts.

[Irongrip400]

Yes like we discussed before. Being attracted to prepubertal little girls is a very bad mental illness and can't be corrected. The male brain genetically reacts to signs of fertility, that's where the gray area comes in. Legally you have to draw the line somewhere, but since the ages of consent obviously differs all over the globe it's obvious there's gray area. Like I've said I think it's good that girls are protected for longer now. But I cringe when some female 21 or 25 year old teacher who has sex with a 17 year old boy student is called a pdfile, it's not that exactly. Abuse of authority and immoral due to the power dynamics, sure, but it's not pedo. In my mind it's WAY less bad than sex with a prepubertal, then I can get behind execution for sure. One comment I get on these things, even my mom said it, that these slightly underage girls for sure know exactly what they are doing, they aren't completely innocent and have to take some responsibility. And many of the Epstein girls were already prostitutes. Doesn't absolve the men but...

Would Americans give Trump a pass if he did have relations with a 17 year old? They are giving him a pass with the pervy underage model pageants, they don't mind the pussy grabbing and so on. I certainly didn't think much of that comment, if a woman let's you grab her by the pussy, what of it?

A lot of these 17 year olds were probably hyper sexual because of being molested as children. I dated a girl in high school, pretty sad now that I’m an adult, who was molested as a four year old by her babysitter with another boy. He turned into a total junky and she was a freak. Cheated on me with a 40 something year old man, dad of one of our mutual friends. I was pissed at the time, but as I got older I realized she was damaged because of some shit bag who took her innocence as a child. You’re right, at 17 this chick was all woman and had no business being with my inexperienced ass, but it was all set in motion much earlier. I can’t stand pedos, they should all be liquidated.

[Van_Bilderass]

some people are above prosecution and most of them are in the videos

Yes and it opens up the interest into other aspects of the associations, why was this person associating with Epstein? I've been saying that these very rich people didn't need Epstein to act out their perversions. Why was he allowed to operate freely for such a long time? Anyone with such immense and unexplained wealth obviously has government eyes on him. As Tucker and many others say, the only explanation is that he was an intelligence asset. The offenders may even have voluntarily given kompromat to Epstein as a way to receive money, support and contacts, as even street gangs do, before you join you have to commit a serious crime.

[Lartinos]

“ The panel approved the Epstein motion, offered by Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), in an 8-2 vote, with Republican Reps. Nancy Mace (S.C.), Scott Perry (Pa.) and Brian Jack (Ga.) joining Democrats in favor.

Lee’s motion called for the “full, complete, unredacted Epstein files to be delivered concurrently to the majority and minority.”

https://share.newsbreak.com/e6x6c41d?s=i16

[Van_Bilderass]

I just read this, fella says Trump could have covered it up while salvaging his agenda, if he simply was honest and said something like this:

“I have been promising for years to release the Epstein files. I’ve created a lot of expectations. Now that I’ve actually looked at the files, they are worse than I ever imagined. If I released these files, it would bring down the government. We would spend the rest of my term embroiled in the Epstein scandal. Yes, justice would be done for a few dozen criminals and a few dozen victims. But at what cost? Basically, at the cost of the MAGA agenda. Deportations, prosperity, peace: all would be sacrificed. You would all suffer. And that’s too high a price to pay. So, for the greater good, I am sealing these papers for 100 years. Epstein’s victims will be compensated from his estate. History will judge Epstein and his clients. And history will also judge that I am doing the right thing for the American people.”

If Trump said this, would you be able to move on?

[kHamas]

You would have been better to read it in the accent of someone that bathes in camel urine.

i read that in voice of someone who bathes in trumps urine...inside out ...

[B_B_C]

I just read this, fella says Trump could have covered it up while salvaging his agenda, if he simply was honest and said something like this:

“I have been promising for years to release the Epstein files. I’ve created a lot of expectations. Now that I’ve actually looked at the files, they are worse than I ever imagined. If I released these files, it would bring down the government. We would spend the rest of my term embroiled in the Epstein scandal. Yes, justice would be done for a few dozen criminals and a few dozen victims. But at what cost? Basically, at the cost of the MAGA agenda. Deportations, prosperity, peace: all would be sacrificed. You would all suffer. And that’s too high a price to pay. So, for the greater good, I am sealing these papers for 100 years. Epstein’s victims will be compensated from his estate. History will judge Epstein and his clients. And history will also judge that I am doing the right thing for the American people.”

If Trump said this, would you be able to move on?

Coverup is the greatest gift Corruption can receive


.

[dj181]

Come on shoot this fuck in his ugly oreane mug already

[ProudVirgin69]

I just read this, fella says Trump could have covered it up while salvaging his agenda, if he simply was honest and said something like this:

“I have been promising for years to release the Epstein files. I’ve created a lot of expectations. Now that I’ve actually looked at the files, they are worse than I ever imagined. If I released these files, it would bring down the government. We would spend the rest of my term embroiled in the Epstein scandal. Yes, justice would be done for a few dozen criminals and a few dozen victims. But at what cost? Basically, at the cost of the MAGA agenda. Deportations, prosperity, peace: all would be sacrificed. You would all suffer. And that’s too high a price to pay. So, for the greater good, I am sealing these papers for 100 years. Epstein’s victims will be compensated from his estate. History will judge Epstein and his clients. And history will also judge that I am doing the right thing for the American people.”

If Trump said this, would you be able to move on?

Absolutely not.  Trump could have let this blown over by saying “we’re still working on it” for the next 3.5 years.  Instead it was his insistence that this is old news, overblown, nothing interesting, that made it in to the huge story it is today.

[tom joad]

I just read this, fella says Trump could have covered it up while salvaging his agenda, if he simply was honest and said something like this:

“I have been promising for years to release the Epstein files. I’ve created a lot of expectations. Now that I’ve actually looked at the files, they are worse than I ever imagined. If I released these files, it would bring down the government. We would spend the rest of my term embroiled in the Epstein scandal. Yes, justice would be done for a few dozen criminals and a few dozen victims. But at what cost? Basically, at the cost of the MAGA agenda. Deportations, prosperity, peace: all would be sacrificed. You would all suffer. And that’s too high a price to pay. So, for the greater good, I am sealing these papers for 100 years. Epstein’s victims will be compensated from his estate. History will judge Epstein and his clients. And history will also judge that I am doing the right thing for the American people.”

If Trump said this, would you be able to move on?

Trump’s proposed scandal-ending statement shouldn’t mention that he was told by his AG that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times?

[Grape Ape]

Absolutely not.  Trump could have let this blown over by saying “we’re still working on it” for the next 3.5 years.  Instead it was his insistence that this is old news, overblown, nothing interesting, that made it in to the huge story it is today.

Agree, what Van said would actually make it worse.

Your answer would have worked.

Now, I did hear Trump, when asked if he would release the files, he said "yes", but then right after "i don't know.  The files were put together prior the prior admin, and I'd hate to see someone innocent have their lives ruined"....not exact, but that was the gist  of it.  And, it's not fair that they never asked the prior admin for it.  However, promises made / kept is their slogan, and this is a big self inflicted wound.

[Van_Bilderass]

Coverup is the greatest gift Corruption can receive


.

Yes , though a statement like that could signal "honesty." Because I think the case probably looks like that, it's too big to blow wide open for state security reasons. I'm not saying that would in fact be enough, just thought it was interesting

Agree, what Van said would actually make it worse.

Your answer would have worked.

Now, I did hear Trump, when asked if he would release the files, he said "yes", but then right after "i don't know.  The files were put together prior the prior admin, and I'd hate to see someone innocent have their lives ruined"....not exact, but that was the gist  of it.  And, it's not fair that they never asked the prior admin for it.  However, promises made / kept is their slogan, and this is a big self inflicted wound.

Trump sure was friends for 15 years with a total "loser," in his words. I now read their falling out was due to some real estate deal, not just Epstein being a perv at Mar-A-Lago.

I'm watching Tucker's latest podcast on Epstein. Epstein was likely involved in selling weapons to IRAN through Israel! LOL. Iran-Contra affair. Some fella named "Kashogi" (sp?) was the link to that,. Epstein, two years college, math teacher at a high school, then a short stint at Uni doing the same. Then suddenly a mover and shaker with unlimited money.

[funk51]

Yes , though a statement like that could signal "honesty." Because I think the case probably looks like that, it's too big to blow wide open for state security reasons. I'm not saying that would in fact be enough, just thought it was interesting

Trump sure was friends for 15 years with a total "loser," in his words. I now read their falling out was due to some real estate deal, not just Epstein being a perv at Mar-A-Lago.

I'm watching Tucker's latest podcast on Epstein. Epstein was likely involved in selling weapons to IRAN through Israel! LOL. Iran-Contra affair. Some fella named "Kashogi" (sp?) was the link to that,. Epstein, two years college, math teacher at a high school, then a short stint at Uni doing the same. Then suddenly a mover and shaker with unlimited money.

  A woman who says Donald Trump raped her at a private sex party when she was 13 years old refiled a lawsuit against him Friday, two weeks after voluntarily dismissing a suit based on the same claims.

The new complaint, filed in the federal court in Manhattan, restates plaintiff Jane Doe's claims of the earlier lawsuit. Namely, that she was lured by a recruiter to summer parties hosted by co-defendant Jeffrey Epstein at an Upper East Side mansion on East 71st St., tied to a bed and forcibly raped by Trump, who slapped her with an open hand and told her he would do whatever he pleased with her.

Jane Does goes on to claim that after Epstein also forcibly raped her, he and Trump bickered over who should have taken the minor plaintiff's virginity.

The original complaint was accompanied by two declarations.

The first declaration, signed by Jane Doe herself, detailed Trump's alleged "savage sexual attack" on the then-13-year-old plaintiff.

The second declaration was signed by pseudonymous Tiffany Doe, who said she was hired by Jeffrey Epstein throughout the 1990s to recruit adolescent women to attend the billionaire's parties.

Tiffany Doe claims she convinced the then-13-year-old plaintiff to attend the parties as a means to break in to New York's professional modeling world. In her declaration, Tiffany Doe says she witnessed four sexual encounters in which Jane Doe was forced to have sex with Trump, and two encounters involving the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein.

The Tiffany Doe declaration included Epstein's threats against her and her family for disclosing the details of any sexual abuse of minors by Epstein and his party guests, swearing under penalty of perjury that she understands that her and her family's lives are "now in grave danger."

The new complaint includes an additional witness exhibit from an anonymous "Joan Doe" whose sworn declaration says Jane Doe told her what happened with Trump and Epstein during the 1994-1995 school year.

Jane Doe says she has been subjected to painful daily reminders of the alleged assault due to the tremendous about of media coverage Trump's presidential campaign has received since he announced his candidacy in mid-June 2015.

Representatives of Trump and his campaign could not immediately be reached for comment on Friday. However, two weeks ago Alan Garten, executive vice president and general counsel for the Trump Organization, told Courthouse News via email that Jane Doe's allegations "are completely frivolous and appear to be politically motivated."

He also went on to say the Trump Organization warned her lawyer, New Jersey attorney Thomas Meagher, "that in the event he decides to refile his complaint we will seek to have him sanctioned."   it seems the falling out came over who was going to take the 13 year old girl's virginity.  IFTHIS IS TRUE DO YOU EVEN REALLY CARE ?

[Grape Ape]

Yes , though a statement like that could signal "honesty." Because I think the case probably looks like that, it's too big to blow wide open for state security reasons. I'm not saying that would in fact be enough, just thought it was interesting

Trump sure was friends for 15 years with a total "loser," in his words. I now read their falling out was due to some real estate deal, not just Epstein being a perv at Mar-A-Lago.

I'm watching Tucker's latest podcast on Epstein. Epstein was likely involved in selling weapons to IRAN through Israel! LOL. Iran-Contra affair. Some fella named "Kashogi" (sp?) was the link to that,. Epstein, two years college, math teacher at a high school, then a short stint at Uni doing the same. Then suddenly a mover and shaker with unlimited money.

It's just that the way it was phrased basically says these folks are "too important" to get prosecuted.  This goes against draining the swamp.

But Trump threw Epstein out, regardless of the reason, before Epstein's first conviction.  AND, Michael Cohen, Trump's old attorney who abosutley despises him, and never misses  a chance, said he never heard Trump mention Epstein even once over the 15 or so years they worked together.  So, I think this "close friendship" is likely just wishful thinking from the libtards.

[Van_Bilderass]

So, I think this "close friendship" is likely just wishful thinking from the libtards.

Maybe true. But people also make false statements for many reasons. Trump's son said he never saw Trump draw one single picture. Trump said he "never wrote picture" in his life but that was obviously false LOL. I think that the whole note thing was a little silly, not a huge deal, it's bickering, but it's an example of him blatantly lying about little things. If you routinely lie about small things you will lie about big things when the consequences of telling the truth are much bigger.

I doubt this will blow over any time soon and Trump is just making it worse every day. I kinda enjoy the circus to be honest. The public is fired up over pdfilia which is understandable. The QAnon contingent would love stories about elite Satanists drinking children's blood in rituals in tunnels under DC. They don't appear to care as much about the intelligence connections, what I think is the bigger story. The pedos should be exposed and punished severely to be sure though.

BTW, Epstein claimed Trump is essentially friendless with no moral compass (an interesting statement coming from him lol), so the question is what's a "friend" in these contexts. Maybe Trump has a lot of associations and sycophants around him but few "real friends." I mean he did say in his book everyone is out to get you, and these are your friends, never mind your enemies.

[B_B_C]

Are MAGA supporters being softened up for a DOJ -Maxwell deal that protects Mr Trump?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-urges-supreme-court-turn-epstein-accomplice-ghislaine/story?id=123752067
The Department of Justice on Monday urged the Supreme Court to turn away an appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, the former associate of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with and aiding Epstein in his sexual abuse of underage girls.

-----------
/\Maxwell’s defense attorney, David Markus, insinuated that Trump was reneging on a deal /\ 
 


https://www.emptywheel.net/2025/07/22/trumps-defense-attorney-todd-blanche-will-meet-with-sex-trafficker-ghislaine-maxwell-to-make-a-deal-for-his-client/

Trump Defense Attorney Todd Blanche and Pam Bondi just announced that Blanche will meet with Ghislaine Maxwell and discuss potential cooperation deals with her.



----------
“Maybe she wants immunity, maybe she wants some sort of protection, I don’t know,” pro-Trump Wunderkind Charlie Kirk said on his show Tuesday. “But it definitely is something that is worthy of praise, and worthy of our encouragement.”
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1947761189234278777

on Newsmax on Monday,  Greg Kelly implied that Maxwell may have been unjustly prosecuted.
https://www.mediamatters.org/greg-kelly/newsmax-host-tries-rehabilitate-newsmax-board-member-alex-acostas-sweetheart-plea-deal
(Alex Acosta, the former federal prosecutor and Trump first-term labor secretary who gave Epstein his original sweetheart plea deal, is on Newsmax’s board.)



TACO v MACO?
(Trump always climbs down ) V MAGa always climbs down

[funk51]

   

                 

   everything's good gov't will now pay you to take drugs. ALL RIGHT.

[funk51]

 

   everything's good gov't will now pay you to take drugs. ALL RIGHT.

   I remember when ferrigno gave 110 percent on the apprentice. and it wasn't enough he was picked on and brought to rears by that bully lisa lampenelli. Moral to the story don't mess with an angry bulldyke.

[Coach is Back!]

Read my tag line. It’s been up there since at least 2016

[tom joad]

Is Epstein the GOAT?

[AbrahamG]

Congresswoman Omar from the great state of Minnesota just rebranded the GOP as PPP which she explained stands for Pedophile Protection Party. 

[chaos]

Congresswoman Omar from the great state of Minnesota just rebranded the GOP as PPP which she explained stands for Pedophile Protection Party.

That towelheads people are the kings of pedos.

[AbrahamG]

That towelheads people are the kings of pedos.

That's why she's able to spot them here so easily. 

[Coach is Back!]

Congresswoman Omar from the great state of Minnesota just rebranded the GOP as PPP which she explained stands for Pedophile Protection Party.

Hilarious since they marry 9 year olds and fuck goats

[AbrahamG]

Hilarious since they marry 9 year olds and fuck goats

The women don't so I think it's fair for her to speak on.