“ Most significantly, I was told” by whom? Name names. The left media and their pundits are famous for “an anonymous source said” “I was told by unnamed source” “an anonymous whistleblower” and ……”I was told” . Hearsay propaganda
Another "I was told" "I heard from someone close" "sources say" bullshit story. Why do you guys post shit like this and swing on it as if it's true? He gives people enough ammo with his behavior and outlandish shit talking for you to come up with legit stories but you leftist weirdos always seem to make shit up with some random "what ifs" then act like it's gospel. 
You know how journalism works. This has nothing to do with the Left or Right per se. The Trump admin intentionally leaks info to journalists all the time, which is then disseminated as info from anonymous sources. You think the conservative press doesn't do this exact same thing? Other times malicious actors within the admin may leak info to so-called enemies. Sometimes the info is true, other times it's not. If there wasn't such a thing as anonymous sources almost no one would come forward with sometimes important revelations, and many shenanigans would never be exposed. I asked what you guys think of this piece because I didn't post it as facts because I obviously don't have first hand knowledge, duh. Seymour has shown that he does have high level sources; he's had a long career and exposed some big things and been right many times, and sometimes wrong. Recently the Washington insiders were feeding him info of how Russia has had 2 million KIAs and he reported it. Doesn't mean it's true, everyone has to decide for themselves

He also wrote an article on how the US blew up the Nordstream pipelines according to his 'inside sources.' It remains to be proven true or false, if it ever will.
Coach is always talking about "leftists" which is silly. Let's say the current admin is feeding Seymour this info now, are they leftists? They may be malicious actors and "conservative" at the same time. Same as when some in Biden's admin thought Biden was a dementia patient. Most of it did not leak, because Biden had been isolated with a very tight and small inner circle. But the point is that Biden's inner circle didn't trust their "leftists" either as there's always people with their own plans and designs. You can bet Trump has many malicious actors around him as well; some would say he's completely surrounded by them and they are trying to subvert his policies, for example wrt Ukraine.
chaos, I'm a leftist? LOL. Just say I'm a Trump hater or something factual instead

Most won't read my long posts but I can't resist mentioning something about Trump and Ukraine. Trump promised to walk away from Ukraine and told Zelensky he had
no cards to play. But what is Trump doing now? "He's" bombing energy plants in Russia!
* While playing an independent mediator LOL. US and NATO are at war with Russia. Russia and Putin know this very well but they are patient and want to keep Trump happy and not close diplomatic doors if at all possible... until the day they are pushed too far. The Tomahawk talk is IMO just a bluff and it's making Trump look like a fool, like most of the things he does (for example the China tariffs which he will have to walk back: TACO). The Tomahawks can't be delivered quickly, there are questions whether a ground based launcher can be used, the Typhon is unworkable, they may not be able to be supplied in sufficient quantities, the conventional warhead Tomahawks can most likely be shot down by Russia very effectively,
the Tomahawks can't be used without direct US personnel involvement and are nuclear capable which Russia has to take into account. They have promised to retaliate perhaps with Oreshniks or nukes on those responsible if they are ever deployed, which is why I doubt they will be delivered, and Trump is just full of shit as usual. Putin didn't say it himself but his mouthpieces have said this talk is damaging the US-Russia relationship and that Anchorage seemed to have been a mistake where nothing was actually accomplished. Nothing more than a photo-op for Trump.
*
https://www.ft.com/content/f9f42c10-3a30-4ee1-aff7-3368dd831c8c