Yes!!! Trump declassifies the Epstein files - 01-23-25

[LurkerNoMore]

Melania is an illegal hatian?

Reading isn't your strong suit is it?  Are you denying she was an immigrant prior?  She was an immigrant.  Came here and plopped out an anchor baby.  Maybe this is Trumpy's coded way of telling her that she is going to catch the pimp hand when he gets home for an ill advised conference without letting him in know in advance.   

[Rambone]

After Melania made her preemptive Epstein denial, the first thing Trumpy did was post a video of a woman being murdered with a hammer.

Trump is a master in timing. Remember Easter Sunday morning?

[LurkerNoMore]

Trump is a master in timing. Remember Easter Sunday morning?

Praise be to Allah!   

[Rambone]

Praise be to Allah!   

Stable genius of peace

[LurkerNoMore]

Stable genius of peace

Best Easter message ever.  Then went out looking at where his Arc should be built in DC.

[chaos]

Reading isn't your strong suit is it?  Are you denying she was an immigrant prior?  She was an immigrant.  Came here and plopped out an anchor baby.  Maybe this is Trumpy's coded way of telling her that she is going to catch the pimp hand when he gets home for an ill advised conference without letting him in know in advance.   

You comparing an immigrant model to an illegal alien killer is hilarious. Exposes what a retard you are even further.

[LurkerNoMore]

You comparing an immigrant model to an illegal alien killer is hilarious. Exposes what a retard you are even further.

Thanks for pointing out (again) how you missed the entire point of my post.  You should have someone to read it out to you slowly with their finger under each word.

[Grape Ape]

 

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche just said he has offered EVERY member of Congress to view UNREDACTED Epstein Files, with no restrictions

"We have released EVERYTHING. We reviewed 6 million pieces of paper! We are not sitting on a SINGLE piece of paper to be released."

"We said to Congress, any congressman can come in and spend as much time as they want, looking at everything unredacted."

"And if you think we should be doing something, congressman or congresswoman, let us know and we will do it."

"I don't know how this department or this president can be more transparent than saying American people."

"Here is every single document in our entire database. And if we had to redact it because of victim names, anybody can come look at it if you're a member of Congress. No restrictions, unredacted."

[Necrosis]

Right on schedule! imagine if they complied with the law.

It's impossible to trust these files now, so much bullshit has happened. Glad to see this though, should of happened right away. Start arresting pedos

[Grape Ape]

Right on schedule! imagine if they complied with the law.

It's impossible to trust these files now, so much bullshit has happened. Glad to see this though, should of happened right away. Start arresting pedos

Nothing's ever good enough, huh?

No President has done jack shit with any of this stuff.

And the guy eventually does, and gets them out, didn't do it the "right way"

 

[Necrosis]

Nothing's ever good enough, huh?

No President has done jack shit with any of this stuff.

And the guy eventually does, and gets them out, didn't do it the "right way"

 

My guy he has an accusation of molesting a young girl in the files which the FBI interviewed.

He has been forced to do so lol. You are acting like he/they didn't do everything under the sun to stop this from happening despite running on it.

Let's see what bullshit comes out of this. I am not giving someone credit for something that they were forced to do and when forced after trying every possible option to obfuscate failed to do so within the allotted time which likely because they are scrubbing shit.

Do you trust this process after all this time and bullshit?

Were there not legal issues with previous presidents releasing this shit? like on-going investigations, grand juries etc.

[Necrosis]

Jesus I didnt realize how cherry picked your quotes were LMAO

no wonder you buy this guys bullshit

https://newrepublic.com/post/209046/acting-attorney-general-blanche-wont-release-more-epstein-files

“Nothing that should be released. If we find something else tomorrow, we’ll release it. I don’t anticipate we will. So the misguided assumption that there is more to be released is because we reviewed millions and millions of pages within the department, millions of which had nothing to do with Epstein.… If we didn’t release it, it’s because it was not responsive to the law, and therefore not part of the Epstein files.… By law, we had to make certain redactions.… But we said to Congress, any congressman can come in and spend as much time as they want looking at everything unredacted.”

Ya ok lol. they have already said there are 3 million more files related to epstein- as part of the case and now its nothing that should be released.

This is facetious at best. As reported earlier this year, 2.5 million documents in the Justice Department’s investigative files on Epstein have yet to be released publicly, and many of the 3.5 million pages that were released have been redacted to hell.

“Todd Blanche needs a reminder that there’s a legally binding subpoena for documents that is different than the law,” Democratic Representative Robert Garcia wrote on X. “This investigation is not a hoax. The DOJ needs to release the rest of files.”

Do you have no shame? I generally don't check half the shit you post but it's a bit disheartening to see you pretending that they have been transparent. They released ultra redacted files, have more they have not released

AND

the one thing they were suppose to redact, the victims names THEY PURPOSELY DID NOT AS A INTIMIDATION TACTIC. my god dude, get a grip. They wouldn't swear a member in to push the vote through, they missed deadlines, the redacted names they shouldn't have. Trump called it a liberal hoax, said there was shit in there made up by Obama.

Do you register dissonance? If Biden did this silly shit you would be all over it, where are your principles here? you seem reasonable.

These fucking guys raped kids bro. They are hiding this shit and you are happy about it.

[Dave D]

You comparing an immigrant model to an illegal alien killer is hilarious. Exposes what a retard you are even further.

It’s hard to comprehend or support Trump acting like an imbecile, but if someone can’t differentiate between and immigrant and an illegal immigrant I don’t know how you have a conversation.

It’s like robbing a bank and saying technically you’re only withdrawing money.

[LurkerNoMore]

It’s hard to comprehend or support Trump acting like an imbecile, but if someone can’t differentiate between and immigrant and an illegal immigrant I don’t know how you have a conversation.

It’s like robbing a bank and saying technically you’re only withdrawing money.

You obviously did not comprehend the point I was making either.

[Grape Ape]

My guy he has an accusation of molesting a young girl in the files which the FBI interviewed.

You've brought this up often, and claimed there were "mountains of evidence" as well.

Until we actually have any, you should table it.

[Necrosis]

You've brought this up often, and claimed there were "mountains of evidence" as well.

Until we actually have any, you should table it.

Nothing fundamentally changed with respect to the files and you posted like something monumental occurred. Zero changed, he simply stated that the other files weren't important essentially.

There is mountains of circumstantial evidence. Nothing that would convict of course, nor beyond a reasonable doubt. So he is innocent until proven otherwise. So being completely objective here, there is nothing one could convict on. However, there is enough to launch and investigation for sure, charge? no, but start the process.

I personally, based on his clear cluster b shit, think he has done shit.

[Grape Ape]

Nothing fundamentally changed with respect to the files and you posted like something monumental occurred. Zero changed, he simply stated that the other files weren't important essentially.

There is mountains of circumstantial evidence. Nothing that would convict of course, nor beyond a reasonable doubt. So he is innocent until proven otherwise. So being completely objective here, there is nothing one could convict on. However, there is enough to launch and investigation for sure, charge? no, but start the process.

I personally, based on his clear cluster b shit, think he has done shit.

This wasn't investigated and dismissed?  What are the mountains of circumstantial evidence?  That he was friends with Epstein?

You just seem to be able to make an easy leap from being friends with someone socially, to tying down young women and raping them.  I'm not.

Look at it this way, if Trump did this, and Epstein either knew or partook, don't you think Epstein would have gotten an immunity deal to land the bigger fish?  Don't you think he would have attempted to use this to help himself?

[chaos]

It’s hard to comprehend or support Trump acting like an imbecile, but if someone can’t differentiate between and immigrant and an illegal immigrant I don’t know how you have a conversation.

It’s like robbing a bank and saying technically you’re only withdrawing money.

I'm not defending Trumps bad decisions, I'm making fun of people that have spent the last 10 years being obsessed with his every move while defending illegal aliens and hoping for the downfall of the US. These people are to be treated with contempt and disgust. We need to get back to the center so we can have rational discussions.

[Methyl m1ke]

Nothing fundamentally changed with respect to the files and you posted like something monumental occurred. Zero changed, he simply stated that the other files weren't important essentially.

There is mountains of circumstantial evidence. Nothing that would convict of course, nor beyond a reasonable doubt. So he is innocent until proven otherwise. So being completely objective here, there is nothing one could convict on. However, there is enough to launch and investigation for sure, charge? no, but start the process.

I personally, based on his clear cluster b shit, think he has done shit.

Maybe he has, were you a saint 35 years ago? Should you be put on trial for transgressions you committed decades ago? My point being who gives a fuck honestly?

[Grape Ape]

Maybe he has, were you a saint 35 years ago? Should you be put on trial for transgressions you committed decades ago? My point being who gives a fuck honestly?

eh, there's levels to this stuff.

If the horseshit Necrosis jumps to is true, that should disqualify you from public office and land you in jail regardless of how long ago it was.

If it's banging hookers over legal age, petty crimes, etc, I would agree with you.

[Necrosis]

Maybe he has, were you a saint 35 years ago? Should you be put on trial for transgressions you committed decades ago? My point being who gives a fuck honestly?

if he raped kids?

everyone should give a fuck.

[Necrosis]

eh, there's levels to this stuff.

If the horseshit Necrosis jumps to is true, that should disqualify you from public office and land you in jail regardless of how long ago it was.

If it's banging hookers over legal age, petty crimes, etc, I would agree with you.

You are framing it like he isn't in the files more than almost anyone and has loads of circumstantial evidence and coincidental stuff occur. He has a rape allegation in the files- one that was not investigated- the girl even said after the fourth interview "whats the point, no one will do anything".

I am not saying he is a pedo for no reason at all.

If we hold him to the standard of the law, ya I would have to agree with you but that's not the same thing as innocent.

[Dave D]

You obviously did not comprehend the point I was making either.

I did. It was a lousy comparison.

[illuminati]

Now there's no excuse from the Dummycraps they're being kept away from the files
They can go search to their hearts content for Solid Facts & Evidence.

Not hearsay & vague 3rd hand stories - If there is Facts & Evidence ( not made up circumstantial crap )
On anyone then Prove it & Prosecute them no matter who the Fuck they are.
If there's Zero then SHUT THE FUCK UP.

[Grape Ape]

You are framing it like he isn't in the files more than almost anyone and has loads of circumstantial evidence and coincidental stuff occur. He has a rape allegation in the files- one that was not investigated- the girl even said after the fourth interview "whats the point, no one will do anything".

I am not saying he is a pedo for no reason at all.

If we hold him to the standard of the law, ya I would have to agree with you but that's not the same thing as innocent.

Ok, this is what I assume you are referring to?

Yes, there is such an accusation in the Epstein files released by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in late 2025 and early 2026. It appears in FBI interview summaries (known as 302s) from 2019, after Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest. These are part of the broader Epstein-related records released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

What the accusation says
An anonymous woman (name redacted in the files) told the FBI she was 13–15 years old in the 1980s when Epstein took her to a “very tall building with huge rooms” in New York or New Jersey. Epstein allegedly introduced her to Donald Trump. She claimed Trump unzipped his pants, forced her head down to his penis to perform oral sex, and hit her in the face after she bit him. She also alleged Epstein raped her separately. The allegation is described in released FBI documents as sexual assault/rape involving a minor.
This is separate from the 2016 Katie Johnson/Jane Doe civil lawsuit (which accused Trump and Epstein of raping her at age 13 in 1994). That suit was filed, then voluntarily withdrawn twice before the election and has long been viewed as uncorroborated and dubious. The 2019 FBI tip is a different accuser and is the one now appearing in the released Epstein files.

Was it investigated?

No, it was not investigated as a criminal case against Trump. The FBI took the woman’s statement as part of a general victim tip line after Epstein’s 2019 arrest. Agents tried to get more details, but she became emotional, declined to answer further questions, and broke off all contact. No follow-up investigation, corroboration, charges, or referral for prosecution occurred. The files contain no indication that Trump was ever treated as a suspect or that the allegation was pursued beyond documenting the tip.

Why wasn’t it investigated further?
The main reasons, based on the files and DOJ statements, are:

No cooperation from the accuser: She refused additional interviews or evidence. Without her continuing participation, the FBI had nothing to build a case on.

Completely uncorroborated: No witnesses, physical evidence, documents, or other victims came forward to support it. It was a single, decades-old claim with no supporting details that could be verified.

Statute of limitations and age of the allegation: The events allegedly happened in the 1980s. By 2019, any potential criminal charges were long expired under federal and state laws.

Nature of the tip: It came in during a broad post-arrest victim outreach effort. The DOJ has repeatedly described these particular claims as “untrue and
sensationalist,” “unfounded and false,” and noted many such tips arrived right before the 2020 election. They stated that if the claims had “a shred of credibility,” prior administrations (including Biden’s DOJ) would have used them.

Some related FBI interview memos were initially missing from the public releases (prompting Democratic accusations of a cover-up and congressional scrutiny). The DOJ later released additional documents, saying they had been mistakenly coded as “duplicative” during the massive document review. The department insists nothing was improperly withheld for political reasons and that all responsive, non-privileged material was produced (except for victim privacy protections or ongoing investigations).

Bottom line
The accusation exists in the Epstein files as an uncorroborated 2019 tip, but it was never treated as credible enough for any real investigation. Trump has always denied any wrongdoing with Epstein or minors, and no evidence beyond this single uncooperative claim has ever surfaced in the files or elsewhere. The files also contain many other unverified tips and rumors about prominent people; law enforcement did not pursue this one for the reasons above.

If this is it:

1. Why is this credible to you
2. What circumstantial evidence points to this crime
3. What about what I mentioned earlier - why wouldn't Epstein try to use this to save his own ass?  The left was willing to go to great lengths to get Trump on anything they could.  But not this?  Doesn't make any sense.