The less processed food is, the better. Sugar always is less bad than artificial sweeteners (they can have very serious adverse effecs), or high fructose corn syrup
This is just not true. You always have to look at individual substances on a case by case basis. "Processed" isn't always worse and "man made chemicals" aren't always worse either. Sometimes processed might even improve nutrient profile, for example some canned vegetables might retain all nutrients and might in fact make some nutrients more bioavailable, by ripening the vegetable more. Saying sugar is ALWAYS better than artificial sweeteners is just ignorant. For example, the fructose part of sugar wreaks havoc on the liver and sugar also obviously makes you fatter which is very harmful. Many artificial sweeteners have only possibly shown harmful effects i n mice at thousands of times the the dosage a human would ingest.
The poison is in the dosage as it always is. What proof do you have that HFCS is more harmful than white sugar, it's fructose and glucose in pretty much the same ratio? We process many foods, only some freaks insist on eating everything in its raw state. Just cooking something is processing. So the dumbos insist eating meat raw "because it's healthier." Not cooking an egg makes the protein only 50% bioavailable, cooking it first makes it almost 100%, an absolutely huge improvement, not to mention killing salmonella and removing avidin. Is cheese, cottage cheese harmful whereas milk is not, I mean it's processed?
Think!

I've posted this many times before. Give this ingredient list to the average conspiracist know-nothing dumbo and ask if they would eat it? "Oh hell no, never would eat all those CHEMICALS!"