Trust the CDC?

[illuminati]

Show me one single example?

You can kinda witness how science works here, the evolution of the ideas and the hedging of claims.

Did you read through the links in your article? they don't say what you this guys is claiming. The first CDC article says the principle vector of infection is respiratory droplets from carrying the virus, that is a fact, it still is. The key word is principle, mainly etc.. there may be other routes but they are not proven to be the case (as of 2020 when that article was published).

bro, the mRNA vaccine didnt even work when the first tried it, it caused an immune reaction. So if they gave up (they obviously thought it would work) and said its black and white we wouldn't have these now. They figured out that dispersing it in nanadroplets would evade immune degradation, that required research on polymers, colloidal physics and immunology all coming together.

Science is always possibly wrong even when it works, the point of a science is to falsify, you are always trying to prove things wrong. It doesn't mean people were lying but basing things on the best evidence.

The only way this make sense (your assertion) and they purposely lied is if they are trying to control people and just happened to piggy back off the virus or they are egomaniacs who claim untrue things without regard for the consequences.

Or is there another reason they would outright lie?

Using you're again!! I fell like a proud gender fluid non-binary dad!!!

FUCK OFF
DISMISSED

[Necrosis]

FUCK OFF
DISMISSED

Good boi, i will let you know when I have more tasks for you to accomplish.

You are very eager to please daddy. I respect it.

[Primemuscle]

You just take the childish position that Trump is not your president.  A distinction without a difference.

FYI, many people have and are taking this position. More folks are every day, even those who voted for him because they believe he has betrayed them. People have multiple reasons for saying this. Many of us believe he is an affront to the office, he is a brutish, unpolished, and more. He is unqualified to hold the position. No one I know believes this is a childish comment to make, except some folks like yourself who disagree. I have no problem with his being your President since this is your choice.

[Dos Equis]

FYI, many people have and are taking this position. More folks are every day, even those who voted for him because they believe he has betrayed them. People have multiple reasons for saying this. Many of us believe he is an affront to the office, he is a brutish, unpolished, and more. He is unqualified to hold the position. No one I know believes this is a childish comment to make, except some folks like yourself who disagree. I have no problem with his being your President since this is your choice.

Many people took this position as soon as he was elected in 2016, so don't give me that BS that it's because he "betrayed" you or anyone else.  It's just election denial.  A refusal to accept the fact that he won.  Twice.  And it's childish.  I don't care how many people do it. 

I didn't vote for Obama, but he was my president.  I didn't vote for Biden, and I despise him for being directly responsible for death of 13 American patriots in Afghanistan, but he was my president.  I voted for Trump and he is my president.  Thank God he won.

[chaos]

Again, you seem unable to understand nuance. Science is objective, it is supposed to tease apart truth from noise. There are charlatans and those who fake data- this is almost always sniffed out.That isn't a charge against how science is conducted its a charge against people, the two things are not mutually exclusive.

Do you understand what I am saying?

Science is a human enterprise that has proven to be the most effect method of determining truth and causation. People can do bad science, people can lie etc,it happens. Rarely does junk science make it far though as the peer review process usually weeds it out, again, another filter to keep it objective.

Anyone in the science community is capable of being bought, if not, ostracized for going against the grain of those that have been bought.

[Dos Equis]

Do you consider Donald Trump to be an authority figure? Have you or would you ever question him or his actions? If you have, it has not been in the political forum on Getbig as best as I can tell.

I consider President Trump to be an authority figure on a lot things:  business, real estate development, foreign policy, trolling leftists and making their heads explode, etc.  I question his action whenever I disagree with him.  And I've done it on the board.  Not my problem you missed those instances.  But so what?  What's your point? 

[Necrosis]

Anyone in the science community is capable of being bought, if not, ostracized for going against the grain of those that have been bought.

You have to produce the data though. you are using the exception to the rule as if its the rule. You seem to think the whole scientific community are paid corporate shills when it was the world. There is data from japan, south korea, UK etc...

[Primemuscle]

I consider President Trump to be an authority figure on a lot things:  business, real estate development, foreign policy, trolling leftists and making their heads explode, etc.  I question his action whenever I disagree with him.  And I've done it on the board.  Not my problem you missed those instances.  But so what?  What's your point?

My post was a simple question. I was not trying to make a point.