California’s unconstitutional gerrymandering

[Primemuscle]

I know you live in Canada and probably have no idea how our system works, but the process in Texas and California is not the same.  The Texas process went through the legislature, like their state constitution allows.  The process in California is a referendum, where people vote, like their state constitution allows.

So both are legal? Coach doesn't think so.

[Dos Equis]

So both are legal? Coach doesn't think so.

So you skip right over how wrong Necrosis was. 

[Primemuscle]

So you skip right over how wrong Necrosis was.

That is Right. Because my question pertains to posts exchanged between Coach and me.

Your response seems rather odd. BTW.

[Dos Equis]

That is Right. Because my question pertains to posts exchanged between Coach and me.

Your response seems rather odd. BTW.

My post was directed to Necrosis.  You responded to my post by talking about Coach.  Odd.  Actually, not it isn't.  It's predictable. 

[Necrosis]

I know you live in Canada and probably have no idea how our system works, but the process in Texas and California is not the same.  The Texas process went through the legislature, like their state constitution allows.  The process in California is a referendum, where people vote, like their state constitution allows.

Seems a lot more democratic via californias method. I mean I can only imagine that the legislature is stacked red in texas. Mid decade map redrawing is pretty rare, with the incumbent generally losing seats in mid terms adding five seats (from immiserated communities) seems like a clear attempt to hold on to power and subvert the will of the people.

I am glad you stated Newsom did it constitutionally refuting coach's claims.

He was probably loading up some guns getting ready to take war to newsom for his treachery.

[Dos Equis]

Seems a lot more democratic via californias method. I mean I can only imagine that the legislature is stacked red in texas. Mid decade map redrawing is pretty rare, with the incumbent generally losing seats in mid terms adding five seats (from immiserated communities) seems like a clear attempt to hold on to power and subvert the will of the people.

I am glad you stated Newsom did it constitutionally refuting coach's claims.

He was probably loading up some guns getting ready to take war to newsom for his treachery.

California voters are stacked blue, so your contention about Texas also applies to California.

[Necrosis]

California voters are stacked blue, so your contention about Texas also applies to California.

not even close. The public vs sitting members is not even close to the same, they can sway each other, collude, have a party they are beholden to, face consequences for not towing the line, I mean I could go on but its so silly it truly doesn't merit a response. Otherwise why have elections? I am going to start tallying up all the logical fallacies you engage in for fun. Have you ever studied logic? You should, it will help you make sense more often and form coherent positions.

today we have something called a false equivalence. That's 1 for today so far- I will leave the others in the other threads out. Give you a fresh start of sorts.

[chaos]

not even close. The public vs sitting members is not even close to the same, they can sway each other, collude, have a party they are beholden to, face consequences for not towing the line, I mean I could go on but its so silly it truly doesn't merit a response. Otherwise why have elections? I am going to start tallying up all the logical fallacies you engage in for fun. Have you ever studied logic? You should, it will help you make sense more often and form coherent positions.

today we have something called a false equivalence. That's 1 for today so far- I will leave the others in the other threads out. Give you a fresh start of sorts.

You should stick to canadian politics. I hope you know more about that pile of shit than you do American politics cause you are one poor deluded, misguided soul.

[Dos Equis]

not even close. The public vs sitting members is not even close to the same, they can sway each other, collude, have a party they are beholden to, face consequences for not towing the line, I mean I could go on but its so silly it truly doesn't merit a response. Otherwise why have elections? I am going to start tallying up all the logical fallacies you engage in for fun. Have you ever studied logic? You should, it will help you make sense more often and form coherent positions.

today we have something called a false equivalence. That's 1 for today so far- I will leave the others in the other threads out. Give you a fresh start of sorts.

That's ignorant.  Voting by elective representatives is primarily how we run our state and federal governments.  You obviously don't know squat about American politics.

But never fear.  We are here to help. 

[Necrosis]

That's ignorant.  Voting by elective representatives is primarily how we run our state and federal governments.  You obviously don't know squat about American politics.

But never fear.  We are here to help.

nice fail lolol.

Resort to ad hominem, this is the third logical fallacy in as many posts- all different as well! lolol. You should seriously think about learning some logic.

There is another fallacy in there as well, do you want me to point it out or can you spot it on your own?

I don't know why you even try as you are constantly sodomized because your reasoning is piss poor.

[Necrosis]

You should stick to canadian politics. I hope you know more about that pile of shit than you do American politics cause you are one poor deluded, misguided soul.

one point proves it, representatives can do things that are unpopular, thats all you need to know to know your assertions are stupid. If it's unpopular, its unpopular with whom? thus it would not be done if put to a vote, but yet it can be because representatives can do unpopular things because of the power vested in them.

I mean I can give you some analogies if thats how you learn? I realize its expedient for you to not admit your logic is unsound.

[chaos]

one point proves it, representatives can do things that are unpopular, thats all you need to know to know your assertions are stupid. If it's unpopular, its unpopular with whom? thus it would not be done if put to a vote, but yet it can be because representatives can do unpopular things because of the power vested in them.

I mean I can give you some analogies if thats how you learn? I realize its expedient for you to not admit your logic is unsound.

Do you even know how they are manipulating your kind here in CA to vote? They are constantly running ads saying that Trump is trying to change the future and the only way to combat it is by voting yes, they are fear mongering you dumb ass democrat voters. For a group of people that calls themselves woke, you dipshits sure aren't seeing things.